-
Detailed Report on the Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm
Authors:
D. P. Aguillard,
T. Albahri,
D. Allspach,
A. Anisenkov,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
L. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
E. Barzi,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
S. Braun,
M. Bressler,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey
, et al. (168 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present details on a new measurement of the muon magnetic anomaly, $a_μ= (g_μ-2)/2$. The result is based on positive muon data taken at Fermilab's Muon Campus during the 2019 and 2020 accelerator runs. The measurement uses $3.1$ GeV$/c$ polarized muons stored in a $7.1$-m-radius storage ring with a $1.45$ T uniform magnetic field. The value of $ a_μ$ is determined from the measured difference b…
▽ More
We present details on a new measurement of the muon magnetic anomaly, $a_μ= (g_μ-2)/2$. The result is based on positive muon data taken at Fermilab's Muon Campus during the 2019 and 2020 accelerator runs. The measurement uses $3.1$ GeV$/c$ polarized muons stored in a $7.1$-m-radius storage ring with a $1.45$ T uniform magnetic field. The value of $ a_μ$ is determined from the measured difference between the muon spin precession frequency and its cyclotron frequency. This difference is normalized to the strength of the magnetic field, measured using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR). The ratio is then corrected for small contributions from beam motion, beam dispersion, and transient magnetic fields. We measure $a_μ= 116 592 057 (25) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.21 ppm). This is the world's most precise measurement of this quantity and represents a factor of $2.2$ improvement over our previous result based on the 2018 dataset. In combination, the two datasets yield $a_μ(\text{FNAL}) = 116 592 055 (24) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.20 ppm). Combining this with the measurements from Brookhaven National Laboratory for both positive and negative muons, the new world average is $a_μ$(exp) $ = 116 592 059 (22) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.19 ppm).
△ Less
Submitted 22 May, 2024; v1 submitted 23 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm
Authors:
D. P. Aguillard,
T. Albahri,
D. Allspach,
A. Anisenkov,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
L. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
E. Barzi,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
S. Braun,
M. Bressler,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey
, et al. (166 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a new measurement of the positive muon magnetic anomaly, $a_μ\equiv (g_μ- 2)/2$, from the Fermilab Muon $g\!-\!2$ Experiment using data collected in 2019 and 2020. We have analyzed more than 4 times the number of positrons from muon decay than in our previous result from 2018 data. The systematic error is reduced by more than a factor of 2 due to better running conditions, a more stable…
▽ More
We present a new measurement of the positive muon magnetic anomaly, $a_μ\equiv (g_μ- 2)/2$, from the Fermilab Muon $g\!-\!2$ Experiment using data collected in 2019 and 2020. We have analyzed more than 4 times the number of positrons from muon decay than in our previous result from 2018 data. The systematic error is reduced by more than a factor of 2 due to better running conditions, a more stable beam, and improved knowledge of the magnetic field weighted by the muon distribution, $\tildeω'^{}_p$, and of the anomalous precession frequency corrected for beam dynamics effects, $ω_a$. From the ratio $ω_a / \tildeω'^{}_p$, together with precisely determined external parameters, we determine $a_μ= 116\,592\,057(25) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.21 ppm). Combining this result with our previous result from the 2018 data, we obtain $a_μ\text{(FNAL)} = 116\,592\,055(24) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.20 ppm). The new experimental world average is $a_μ(\text{Exp}) = 116\,592\,059(22)\times 10^{-11}$ (0.19 ppm), which represents a factor of 2 improvement in precision.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2023; v1 submitted 11 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
The Straw Tracking Detector for the Fermilab Muon $g-2$ Experiment
Authors:
B. T. King,
T. Albahri,
S. Al-Kilani,
D. Allspach,
D. Beckner,
A. Behnke,
T. J. V. Bowcock,
D. Boyden,
R. M. Carey,
J. Carroll,
B. C. K. Casey,
S. Charity,
R. Chislett,
M. Eads,
A. Epps,
S. B. Foster,
D. Gastler,
S. Grant,
T. Halewood-Leagas,
K. Hardin,
E. Hazen,
G. Hesketh,
D. J. Hollywood,
T. Jones,
C. Kenziora
, et al. (32 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Muon $g-2$ Experiment at Fermilab uses a gaseous straw tracking detector to make detailed measurements of the stored muon beam profile, which are essential for the experiment to achieve its uncertainty goals. Positrons from muon decays spiral inward and pass through the tracking detector before striking an electromagnetic calorimeter. The tracking detector is therefore located inside the vacuu…
▽ More
The Muon $g-2$ Experiment at Fermilab uses a gaseous straw tracking detector to make detailed measurements of the stored muon beam profile, which are essential for the experiment to achieve its uncertainty goals. Positrons from muon decays spiral inward and pass through the tracking detector before striking an electromagnetic calorimeter. The tracking detector is therefore located inside the vacuum chamber in a region where the magnetic field is large and non-uniform. As such, the tracking detector must have a low leak rate to maintain a high-quality vacuum, must be non-magnetic so as not to perturb the magnetic field and, to minimize energy loss, must have a low radiation length. The performance of the tracking detector has met or surpassed the design requirements, with adequate electronic noise levels, an average straw hit resolution of $(110 \pm 20) \,μ$m, a detection efficiency of 97% or higher, and no performance degradation or signs of aging. The tracking detector's measurements result in an otherwise unachievable understanding of the muon's beam motion, particularly at early times in the experiment's measurement period when there are a significantly greater number of muons decaying. This is vital to the statistical power of the experiment, as well as facilitating the precise extraction of several systematic corrections and uncertainties. This paper describes the design, construction, testing, commissioning, and performance of the tracking detector.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2022; v1 submitted 3 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
The fast non-ferric kicker system for the Muon $g-2$ Experiment at Fermilab
Authors:
A. P. Schreckenberger,
D. Allspach,
D. Barak,
J. Bohn,
C. Bradford,
D. Cauz,
S. P. Chang,
A. Chapelain,
S. Chappa,
S. Charity,
R. Chislett,
J. Esquivel,
C. Ferrari,
A. Fioretti,
C. Gabbanini,
M. D. Galati,
L. Gibbons,
J. L. Holzbauer,
M. Incagli,
C. Jensen,
J. Kaspar,
D. Kawall,
A. Keshavarzi,
D. S. Kessler,
B. Kiburg
, et al. (17 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We describe the installation, commissioning, and characterization of the new injection kicker system in the Muon $g-2$ Experiment (E989) at Fermilab, which makes a precision measurement of the muon magnetic anomaly. Three Blumlein pulsers drive each of the 1.27-m-long non-ferric kicker magnets, which reside in a storage ring vacuum (SRV) that is subjected to a 1.45 T magnetic field. The new system…
▽ More
We describe the installation, commissioning, and characterization of the new injection kicker system in the Muon $g-2$ Experiment (E989) at Fermilab, which makes a precision measurement of the muon magnetic anomaly. Three Blumlein pulsers drive each of the 1.27-m-long non-ferric kicker magnets, which reside in a storage ring vacuum (SRV) that is subjected to a 1.45 T magnetic field. The new system has been redesigned relative to Muon $g-2$'s predecessor experiment, and we present those details in this manuscript.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2021; v1 submitted 15 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm
Authors:
B. Abi,
T. Albahri,
S. Al-Kilani,
D. Allspach,
L. P. Alonzi,
A. Anastasi,
A. Anisenkov,
F. Azfar,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
E. Barzi,
A. Basti,
F. Bedeschi,
A. Behnke,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
R. Bjorkquist,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico
, et al. (212 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the first results of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment for the positive muon magnetic anomaly $a_μ\equiv (g_μ-2)/2$. The anomaly is determined from the precision measurements of two angular frequencies. Intensity variation of high-energy positrons from muon decays directly encodes the difference frequency $ω_a$ between the spin-precession and cyclotron frequencies for polarized muons in…
▽ More
We present the first results of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment for the positive muon magnetic anomaly $a_μ\equiv (g_μ-2)/2$. The anomaly is determined from the precision measurements of two angular frequencies. Intensity variation of high-energy positrons from muon decays directly encodes the difference frequency $ω_a$ between the spin-precession and cyclotron frequencies for polarized muons in a magnetic storage ring. The storage ring magnetic field is measured using nuclear magnetic resonance probes calibrated in terms of the equivalent proton spin precession frequency ${\tildeω'^{}_p}$ in a spherical water sample at 34.7$^{\circ}$C. The ratio $ω_a / {\tildeω'^{}_p}$, together with known fundamental constants, determines $a_μ({\rm FNAL}) = 116\,592\,040(54)\times 10^{-11}$ (0.46\,ppm). The result is 3.3 standard deviations greater than the standard model prediction and is in excellent agreement with the previous Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) E821 measurement. After combination with previous measurements of both $μ^+$ and $μ^-$, the new experimental average of $a_μ({\rm Exp}) = 116\,592\,061(41)\times 10^{-11}$ (0.35\,ppm) increases the tension between experiment and theory to 4.2 standard deviations
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Muon (g-2) Technical Design Report
Authors:
J. Grange,
V. Guarino,
P. Winter,
K. Wood,
H. Zhao,
R. M. Carey,
D. Gastler,
E. Hazen,
N. Kinnaird,
J. P. Miller,
J. Mott,
B. L. Roberts,
J. Benante,
J. Crnkovic,
W. M. Morse,
H. Sayed,
V. Tishchenko,
V. P. Druzhinin,
B. I. Khazin,
I. A. Koop,
I. Logashenko,
Y. M. Shatunov,
E. Solodov,
M. Korostelev,
D. Newton
, et al. (176 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Muon (g-2) Experiment, E989 at Fermilab, will measure the muon anomalous magnetic moment a factor-of-four more precisely than was done in E821 at the Brookhaven National Laboratory AGS. The E821 result appears to be greater than the Standard-Model prediction by more than three standard deviations. When combined with expected improvement in the Standard-Model hadronic contributions, E989 should…
▽ More
The Muon (g-2) Experiment, E989 at Fermilab, will measure the muon anomalous magnetic moment a factor-of-four more precisely than was done in E821 at the Brookhaven National Laboratory AGS. The E821 result appears to be greater than the Standard-Model prediction by more than three standard deviations. When combined with expected improvement in the Standard-Model hadronic contributions, E989 should be able to determine definitively whether or not the E821 result is evidence for physics beyond the Standard Model. After a review of the physics motivation and the basic technique, which will use the muon storage ring built at BNL and now relocated to Fermilab, the design of the new experiment is presented. This document was created in partial fulfillment of the requirements necessary to obtain DOE CD-2/3 approval.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2018; v1 submitted 27 January, 2015;
originally announced January 2015.
-
The 2010 Interim Report of the Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment Collaboration Physics Working Groups
Authors:
The LBNE Collaboration,
T. Akiri,
D. Allspach,
M. Andrews,
K. Arisaka,
E. Arrieta-Diaz,
M. Artuso,
X. Bai,
B. Balantekin,
B. Baller,
W. Barletta,
G. Barr,
M. Bass,
A. Beck,
B. Becker,
V. Bellini,
O. Benhar,
B. Berger,
M. Bergevin,
E. Berman,
H. Berns,
A. Bernstein,
F. Beroz,
V. Bhatnagar,
B. Bhuyan
, et al. (308 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In early 2010, the Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment (LBNE) science collaboration initiated a study to investigate the physics potential of the experiment with a broad set of different beam, near- and far-detector configurations. Nine initial topics were identified as scientific areas that motivate construction of a long-baseline neutrino experiment with a very large far detector. We summarize the…
▽ More
In early 2010, the Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment (LBNE) science collaboration initiated a study to investigate the physics potential of the experiment with a broad set of different beam, near- and far-detector configurations. Nine initial topics were identified as scientific areas that motivate construction of a long-baseline neutrino experiment with a very large far detector. We summarize the scientific justification for each topic and the estimated performance for a set of far detector reference configurations. We report also on a study of optimized beam parameters and the physics capability of proposed Near Detector configurations. This document was presented to the collaboration in fall 2010 and updated with minor modifications in early 2011.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2011;
originally announced October 2011.
