-
Work-from-home and its implication for project management, resilience and innovation -- a global survey on software companies
Authors:
Anh Nguyen-Duc,
Dron Khanna,
Des Greer,
Xiaofeng Wang,
Luciana Martinez Zaina,
Gerardo Matturro,
Jorge Melegati,
Eduardo Guerra,
Giang Huong Le,
Petri Kettunen,
Sami Hyrynsalmi,
Henry Edison,
Afonso Sales,
Didzis Rutitis,
Kai-Kristian Kemell,
Abdullah Aldaeej,
Tommi Mikkonen,
Juan Garbajosa,
Pekka Abrahamsson
Abstract:
[Context] The COVID-19 pandemic has had a disruptive impact on how people work and collaborate across all global economic sectors, including the software business. While remote working is not new for software engineers, forced Work-from-home situations to come with both constraints, limitations, and opportunities for individuals, software teams and software companies. As the "new normal" for worki…
▽ More
[Context] The COVID-19 pandemic has had a disruptive impact on how people work and collaborate across all global economic sectors, including the software business. While remote working is not new for software engineers, forced Work-from-home situations to come with both constraints, limitations, and opportunities for individuals, software teams and software companies. As the "new normal" for working might be based on the current state of Work From Home (WFH), it is useful to understand what has happened and learn from that. [Objective] The goal of this study is to gain insights on how their WFH environment impacts software projects and software companies. We are also interested in understanding if the impact differs between software startups and established companies. [Method] We conducted a global-scale, cross-sectional survey during spring and summer 2021. Our results are based on quantitative and qualitative analysis of 297 valid responses. [Results] We observed a mixed perception of the impact of WFH on software project management, resilience, and innovation. Certain patterns on WFH, control and coordination mechanisms and collaborative tools are observed globally. We find that team, agility and leadership are the three most important factors for achieving resilience during the pandemic. Although startups do not perceive the impact of WFH differently, there is a difference between engineers who work in a small team context and those who work in a large team context. [Conclusion] The result suggests a contingency approach in studying and improving WFH practices and environment in the future software industry.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Business Model Canvas Should Pay More Attention to the Software Startup Team
Authors:
Kai-Kristian Kemell,
Atte Elonen,
Mari Suoranta,
Anh Nguyen-Duc,
Juan Garbajosa,
Rafael Chanin,
Jorge Melegati,
Usman Rafiq,
Abdullah Aldaeej,
Nana Assyne,
Afonso Sales,
Sami Hyrynsalmi,
Juhani Riski,
Henry Edison,
Pekka Abrahamsson
Abstract:
Business Model Canvas (BMC) is a tool widely used to describe startup business models. Despite the various business aspects described, BMC pays a little emphasis on team-related factors. The importance of team-related factors in software development has been acknowledged widely in literature. While not as extensively studied, the importance of teams in software startups is also known in both liter…
▽ More
Business Model Canvas (BMC) is a tool widely used to describe startup business models. Despite the various business aspects described, BMC pays a little emphasis on team-related factors. The importance of team-related factors in software development has been acknowledged widely in literature. While not as extensively studied, the importance of teams in software startups is also known in both literature and among practitioners. In this paper, we propose potential changes to BMC to have the tool better reflect the importance of the team, especially in a software startup environment. Based on a literature review, we identify various components related to the team, which we then further support with empirical data. We do so by means of a qualitative case study of five startups.
△ Less
Submitted 11 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
A Fine-grained Data Set and Analysis of Tangling in Bug Fixing Commits
Authors:
Steffen Herbold,
Alexander Trautsch,
Benjamin Ledel,
Alireza Aghamohammadi,
Taher Ahmed Ghaleb,
Kuljit Kaur Chahal,
Tim Bossenmaier,
Bhaveet Nagaria,
Philip Makedonski,
Matin Nili Ahmadabadi,
Kristof Szabados,
Helge Spieker,
Matej Madeja,
Nathaniel Hoy,
Valentina Lenarduzzi,
Shangwen Wang,
Gema Rodríguez-Pérez,
Ricardo Colomo-Palacios,
Roberto Verdecchia,
Paramvir Singh,
Yihao Qin,
Debasish Chakroborti,
Willard Davis,
Vijay Walunj,
Hongjun Wu
, et al. (23 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Context: Tangled commits are changes to software that address multiple concerns at once. For researchers interested in bugs, tangled commits mean that they actually study not only bugs, but also other concerns irrelevant for the study of bugs.
Objective: We want to improve our understanding of the prevalence of tangling and the types of changes that are tangled within bug fixing commits.
Metho…
▽ More
Context: Tangled commits are changes to software that address multiple concerns at once. For researchers interested in bugs, tangled commits mean that they actually study not only bugs, but also other concerns irrelevant for the study of bugs.
Objective: We want to improve our understanding of the prevalence of tangling and the types of changes that are tangled within bug fixing commits.
Methods: We use a crowd sourcing approach for manual labeling to validate which changes contribute to bug fixes for each line in bug fixing commits. Each line is labeled by four participants. If at least three participants agree on the same label, we have consensus.
Results: We estimate that between 17% and 32% of all changes in bug fixing commits modify the source code to fix the underlying problem. However, when we only consider changes to the production code files this ratio increases to 66% to 87%. We find that about 11% of lines are hard to label leading to active disagreements between participants. Due to confirmed tangling and the uncertainty in our data, we estimate that 3% to 47% of data is noisy without manual untangling, depending on the use case.
Conclusion: Tangled commits have a high prevalence in bug fixes and can lead to a large amount of noise in the data. Prior research indicates that this noise may alter results. As researchers, we should be skeptics and assume that unvalidated data is likely very noisy, until proven otherwise.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2021; v1 submitted 12 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
