-
Never Train from Scratch: Fair Comparison of Long-Sequence Models Requires Data-Driven Priors
Authors:
Ido Amos,
Jonathan Berant,
Ankit Gupta
Abstract:
Modeling long-range dependencies across sequences is a longstanding goal in machine learning and has led to architectures, such as state space models, that dramatically outperform Transformers on long sequences. However, these impressive empirical gains have been by and large demonstrated on benchmarks (e.g. Long Range Arena), where models are randomly initialized and trained to predict a target l…
▽ More
Modeling long-range dependencies across sequences is a longstanding goal in machine learning and has led to architectures, such as state space models, that dramatically outperform Transformers on long sequences. However, these impressive empirical gains have been by and large demonstrated on benchmarks (e.g. Long Range Arena), where models are randomly initialized and trained to predict a target label from an input sequence. In this work, we show that random initialization leads to gross overestimation of the differences between architectures and that pretraining with standard denoising objectives, using $\textit{only the downstream task data}$, leads to dramatic gains across multiple architectures and to very small gaps between Transformers and state space models (SSMs). In stark contrast to prior works, we find vanilla Transformers to match the performance of S4 on Long Range Arena when properly pretrained, and we improve the best reported results of SSMs on the PathX-256 task by 20 absolute points. Subsequently, we analyze the utility of previously-proposed structured parameterizations for SSMs and show they become mostly redundant in the presence of data-driven initialization obtained through pretraining. Our work shows that, when evaluating different architectures on supervised tasks, incorporation of data-driven priors via pretraining is essential for reliable performance estimation, and can be done efficiently.
△ Less
Submitted 28 April, 2024; v1 submitted 4 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Graph Neural Networks Use Graphs When They Shouldn't
Authors:
Maya Bechler-Speicher,
Ido Amos,
Ran Gilad-Bachrach,
Amir Globerson
Abstract:
Predictions over graphs play a crucial role in various domains, including social networks and medicine. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as the dominant approach for learning on graph data. Although a graph-structure is provided as input to the GNN, in some cases the best solution can be obtained by ignoring it. While GNNs have the ability to ignore the graph- structure in such cases, it…
▽ More
Predictions over graphs play a crucial role in various domains, including social networks and medicine. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as the dominant approach for learning on graph data. Although a graph-structure is provided as input to the GNN, in some cases the best solution can be obtained by ignoring it. While GNNs have the ability to ignore the graph- structure in such cases, it is not clear that they will. In this work, we show that GNNs actually tend to overfit the given graph-structure. Namely, they use it even when a better solution can be obtained by ignoring it. We analyze the implicit bias of gradient-descent learning of GNNs and prove that when the ground truth function does not use the graphs, GNNs are not guaranteed to learn a solution that ignores the graph, even with infinite data. We examine this phenomenon with respect to different graph distributions and find that regular graphs are more robust to this over-fitting. We also prove that within the family of regular graphs, GNNs are guaranteed to extrapolate when learning with gradient descent. Finally, based on our empirical and theoretical findings, we demonstrate on real-data how regular graphs can be leveraged to reduce graph overfitting and enhance performance.
△ Less
Submitted 25 February, 2024; v1 submitted 8 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
ASOCEM: Automatic Segmentation Of Contaminations in cryo-EM
Authors:
Amitay Eldar,
Ido Amos,
Yoel Shkolnisky
Abstract:
Particle picking is currently a critical step in the cryo-electron microscopy single particle reconstruction pipeline. Contaminations in the acquired micrographs severely degrade the performance of particle pickers, resulting is many ``non-particles'' in the collected stack of particles. In this paper, we present ASOCEM (Automatic Segmentation Of Contaminations in cryo-EM), an automatic method to…
▽ More
Particle picking is currently a critical step in the cryo-electron microscopy single particle reconstruction pipeline. Contaminations in the acquired micrographs severely degrade the performance of particle pickers, resulting is many ``non-particles'' in the collected stack of particles. In this paper, we present ASOCEM (Automatic Segmentation Of Contaminations in cryo-EM), an automatic method to detect and segment contaminations, which requires as an input only the approximated particle size. In particular, it does not require any parameter tuning nor manual intervention. Our method is based on the observation that the statistical distribution of contaminated regions is different from that of the rest of the micrograph. This nonrestrictive assumption allows to automatically detect various types of contaminations, from the carbon edges of the supporting grid to high contrast blobs of different sizes. We demonstrate the efficiency of our algorithm using various experimental data sets containing various types of contaminations. ASOCEM is integrated as part of the KLT picker \cite{ELDAR2020107473} and is available at \url{https://github.com/ShkolniskyLab/kltpicker2}.
△ Less
Submitted 18 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
