Showing 1–17 of 17 results for author: Antonelli, M

Enumerating Error Bounded Polytime Algorithms Through Arithmetical Theories

Authors: Melissa Antonelli, Ugo Dal Lago, Davide Davoli, Isabel Oitavem, Paolo Pistone

Abstract: We consider a minimal extension of the language of arithmetic, such that the bounded formulas provably total in a suitably-defined theory à la Buss (expressed in this new language) precisely capture polytime random functions. Then, we provide two new characterizations of the semantic class BPP obtained by internalizing the error-bound check within a logical system: the first relies on measure-sens… ▽ More We consider a minimal extension of the language of arithmetic, such that the bounded formulas provably total in a suitably-defined theory à la Buss (expressed in this new language) precisely capture polytime random functions. Then, we provide two new characterizations of the semantic class BPP obtained by internalizing the error-bound check within a logical system: the first relies on measure-sensitive quantifiers, while the second is based on standard first-order quantification. This leads us to introduce a family of effectively enumerable subclasses of BPP, called BPP_T and consisting of languages captured by those probabilistic Turing machines whose underlying error can be proved bounded in the theory T. As a paradigmatic example of this approach, we establish that polynomial identity testing is in BPP_T where T=$\mathrm{I}Δ_0+\mathrm{Exp}$ is a well-studied theory based on bounded induction. △ Less

Submitted 25 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

ACM Class: F.4.1; F.1.3

Benchmarking Collaborative Learning Methods Cost-Effectiveness for Prostate Segmentation

Authors: Lucia Innocenti, Michela Antonelli, Francesco Cremonesi, Kenaan Sarhan, Alejandro Granados, Vicky Goh, Sebastien Ourselin, Marco Lorenzi

Abstract: Healthcare data is often split into medium/small-sized collections across multiple hospitals and access to it is encumbered by privacy regulations. This brings difficulties to use them for the development of machine learning and deep learning models, which are known to be data-hungry. One way to overcome this limitation is to use collaborative learning (CL) methods, which allow hospitals to work c… ▽ More Healthcare data is often split into medium/small-sized collections across multiple hospitals and access to it is encumbered by privacy regulations. This brings difficulties to use them for the development of machine learning and deep learning models, which are known to be data-hungry. One way to overcome this limitation is to use collaborative learning (CL) methods, which allow hospitals to work collaboratively to solve a task, without the need to explicitly share local data. In this paper, we address a prostate segmentation problem from MRI in a collaborative scenario by comparing two different approaches: federated learning (FL) and consensus-based methods (CBM). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work in which CBM, such as label fusion techniques, are used to solve a problem of collaborative learning. In this setting, CBM combine predictions from locally trained models to obtain a federated strong learner with ideally improved robustness and predictive variance properties. Our experiments show that, in the considered practical scenario, CBMs provide equal or better results than FL, while being highly cost-effective. Our results demonstrate that the consensus paradigm may represent a valid alternative to FL for typical training tasks in medical imaging. △ Less

Submitted 2 October, 2023; v1 submitted 29 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

DeepEdit: Deep Editable Learning for Interactive Segmentation of 3D Medical Images

Authors: Andres Diaz-Pinto, Pritesh Mehta, Sachidanand Alle, Muhammad Asad, Richard Brown, Vishwesh Nath, Alvin Ihsani, Michela Antonelli, Daniel Palkovics, Csaba Pinter, Ron Alkalay, Steve Pieper, Holger R. Roth, Daguang Xu, Prerna Dogra, Tom Vercauteren, Andrew Feng, Abood Quraini, Sebastien Ourselin, M. Jorge Cardoso

Abstract: Automatic segmentation of medical images is a key step for diagnostic and interventional tasks. However, achieving this requires large amounts of annotated volumes, which can be tedious and time-consuming task for expert annotators. In this paper, we introduce DeepEdit, a deep learning-based method for volumetric medical image annotation, that allows automatic and semi-automatic segmentation, and… ▽ More Automatic segmentation of medical images is a key step for diagnostic and interventional tasks. However, achieving this requires large amounts of annotated volumes, which can be tedious and time-consuming task for expert annotators. In this paper, we introduce DeepEdit, a deep learning-based method for volumetric medical image annotation, that allows automatic and semi-automatic segmentation, and click-based refinement. DeepEdit combines the power of two methods: a non-interactive (i.e. automatic segmentation using nnU-Net, UNET or UNETR) and an interactive segmentation method (i.e. DeepGrow), into a single deep learning model. It allows easy integration of uncertainty-based ranking strategies (i.e. aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty computation) and active learning. We propose and implement a method for training DeepEdit by using standard training combined with user interaction simulation. Once trained, DeepEdit allows clinicians to quickly segment their datasets by using the algorithm in auto segmentation mode or by providing clicks via a user interface (i.e. 3D Slicer, OHIF). We show the value of DeepEdit through evaluation on the PROSTATEx dataset for prostate/prostatic lesions and the Multi-Atlas Labeling Beyond the Cranial Vault (BTCV) dataset for abdominal CT segmentation, using state-of-the-art network architectures as baseline for comparison. DeepEdit could reduce the time and effort annotating 3D medical images compared to DeepGrow alone. Source code is available at https://github.com/Project-MONAI/MONAILabel △ Less

Submitted 17 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validation

Authors: Annika Reinke, Minu D. Tizabi, Michael Baumgartner, Matthias Eisenmann, Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel, A. Emre Kavur, Tim Rädsch, Carole H. Sudre, Laura Acion, Michela Antonelli, Tal Arbel, Spyridon Bakas, Arriel Benis, Matthew Blaschko, Florian Buettner, M. Jorge Cardoso, Veronika Cheplygina, Jianxu Chen, Evangelia Christodoulou, Beth A. Cimini, Gary S. Collins, Keyvan Farahani, Luciana Ferrer, Adrian Galdran, Bram van Ginneken , et al. (53 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Validation metrics are key for the reliable tracking of scientific progress and for bridging the current chasm between artificial intelligence (AI) research and its translation into practice. However, increasing evidence shows that particularly in image analysis, metrics are often chosen inadequately in relation to the underlying research problem. This could be attributed to a lack of accessibilit… ▽ More Validation metrics are key for the reliable tracking of scientific progress and for bridging the current chasm between artificial intelligence (AI) research and its translation into practice. However, increasing evidence shows that particularly in image analysis, metrics are often chosen inadequately in relation to the underlying research problem. This could be attributed to a lack of accessibility of metric-related knowledge: While taking into account the individual strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of validation metrics is a critical prerequisite to making educated choices, the relevant knowledge is currently scattered and poorly accessible to individual researchers. Based on a multi-stage Delphi process conducted by a multidisciplinary expert consortium as well as extensive community feedback, the present work provides the first reliable and comprehensive common point of access to information on pitfalls related to validation metrics in image analysis. Focusing on biomedical image analysis but with the potential of transfer to other fields, the addressed pitfalls generalize across application domains and are categorized according to a newly created, domain-agnostic taxonomy. To facilitate comprehension, illustrations and specific examples accompany each pitfall. As a structured body of information accessible to researchers of all levels of expertise, this work enhances global comprehension of a key topic in image analysis validation. △ Less

Submitted 23 February, 2024; v1 submitted 3 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Comments: Shared first authors: Annika Reinke and Minu D. Tizabi; shared senior authors: Lena Maier-Hein and Paul F. Jäger. Published in Nature Methods. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2206.01653

Journal ref: Nature methods, 1-13 (2024)

An Arithmetic Theory for the Poly-Time Random Functions

Authors: Melissa Antonelli, Ugo Dal Lago, Davide Davoli, Isabel Oitavem, Paolo Pistone

Abstract: We introduce a new bounded theory RS^1_2 and show that the functions which are Sigma^b_1-representable in it are precisely random functions which can be computed in polynomial time. Concretely, we pass through a class of oracle functions over string, called POR, together with the theory of arithmetic RS^1_2. Then, we show that functions computed by poly-time PTMs are arithmetically characterized b… ▽ More We introduce a new bounded theory RS^1_2 and show that the functions which are Sigma^b_1-representable in it are precisely random functions which can be computed in polynomial time. Concretely, we pass through a class of oracle functions over string, called POR, together with the theory of arithmetic RS^1_2. Then, we show that functions computed by poly-time PTMs are arithmetically characterized by a class of probabilistic bounded formulas. △ Less

Submitted 6 February, 2023; v1 submitted 27 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Comments: 37 pages, pre-print

Some Remarks on Counting Propositional Logic

Authors: Melissa Antonelli

Abstract: Counting propositional logic was recently introduced in relation to randomized computation and shown able to logically characterize the full counting hierarchy. In this paper we aim to clarify the intuitive meaning and expressive power of its univariate fragment. On the one hand, we provide an effective procedure to measure the probability of counting formulas. On the other, we make the connection… ▽ More Counting propositional logic was recently introduced in relation to randomized computation and shown able to logically characterize the full counting hierarchy. In this paper we aim to clarify the intuitive meaning and expressive power of its univariate fragment. On the one hand, we provide an effective procedure to measure the probability of counting formulas. On the other, we make the connection between this logic and stochastic experiments explicit, proving that the counting language can simulate any (and only) event associated with dyadic distributions. △ Less

Submitted 16 November, 2022; v1 submitted 28 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Comments: joint work with Ugo Dal Lago and Paolo Pistone

Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validation

Authors: Lena Maier-Hein, Annika Reinke, Patrick Godau, Minu D. Tizabi, Florian Buettner, Evangelia Christodoulou, Ben Glocker, Fabian Isensee, Jens Kleesiek, Michal Kozubek, Mauricio Reyes, Michael A. Riegler, Manuel Wiesenfarth, A. Emre Kavur, Carole H. Sudre, Michael Baumgartner, Matthias Eisenmann, Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel, Tim Rädsch, Laura Acion, Michela Antonelli, Tal Arbel, Spyridon Bakas, Arriel Benis, Matthew Blaschko , et al. (49 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Increasing evidence shows that flaws in machine learning (ML) algorithm validation are an underestimated global problem. Particularly in automatic biomedical image analysis, chosen performance metrics often do not reflect the domain interest, thus failing to adequately measure scientific progress and hindering translation of ML techniques into practice. To overcome this, our large international ex… ▽ More Increasing evidence shows that flaws in machine learning (ML) algorithm validation are an underestimated global problem. Particularly in automatic biomedical image analysis, chosen performance metrics often do not reflect the domain interest, thus failing to adequately measure scientific progress and hindering translation of ML techniques into practice. To overcome this, our large international expert consortium created Metrics Reloaded, a comprehensive framework guiding researchers in the problem-aware selection of metrics. Following the convergence of ML methodology across application domains, Metrics Reloaded fosters the convergence of validation methodology. The framework was developed in a multi-stage Delphi process and is based on the novel concept of a problem fingerprint - a structured representation of the given problem that captures all aspects that are relevant for metric selection, from the domain interest to the properties of the target structure(s), data set and algorithm output. Based on the problem fingerprint, users are guided through the process of choosing and applying appropriate validation metrics while being made aware of potential pitfalls. Metrics Reloaded targets image analysis problems that can be interpreted as a classification task at image, object or pixel level, namely image-level classification, object detection, semantic segmentation, and instance segmentation tasks. To improve the user experience, we implemented the framework in the Metrics Reloaded online tool, which also provides a point of access to explore weaknesses, strengths and specific recommendations for the most common validation metrics. The broad applicability of our framework across domains is demonstrated by an instantiation for various biological and medical image analysis use cases. △ Less

Submitted 23 February, 2024; v1 submitted 3 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: Shared first authors: Lena Maier-Hein, Annika Reinke. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2104.05642 Published in Nature Methods

Journal ref: Nature methods, 1-18 (2024)

Curry and Howard Meet Borel

Authors: Melissa Antonelli, Ugo Dal Lago, Paolo Pistone

Abstract: We show that an intuitionistic version of counting propositional logic corresponds, in the sense of Curry and Howard, to an expressive type system for the probabilistic event lambda-calculus, a vehicle calculus in which both call-by-name and call-by-value evaluation of discrete randomized functional programs can be simulated. Remarkably, proofs (respectively, types) do not only guarantee that vali… ▽ More We show that an intuitionistic version of counting propositional logic corresponds, in the sense of Curry and Howard, to an expressive type system for the probabilistic event lambda-calculus, a vehicle calculus in which both call-by-name and call-by-value evaluation of discrete randomized functional programs can be simulated. Remarkably, proofs (respectively, types) do not only guarantee that validity (respectively, termination) holds, but also reveal the underlying probability. We finally show that by endowing the type system with an intersection operator, one obtains a system precisely capturing the probabilistic behavior of lambda-terms. △ Less

Submitted 21 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

ACM Class: F.4.1; F.3.2; D.3.1

Adapting Bandit Algorithms for Settings with Sequentially Available Arms

Authors: Marco Gabrielli, Francesco Trovò, Manuela Antonelli

Abstract: Although the classical version of the Multi-Armed Bandits (MAB) framework has been applied successfully to several practical problems, in many real-world applications, the possible actions are not presented to the learner simultaneously, such as in the Internet campaign management and environmental monitoring settings. Instead, in such applications, a set of options is presented sequentially to th… ▽ More Although the classical version of the Multi-Armed Bandits (MAB) framework has been applied successfully to several practical problems, in many real-world applications, the possible actions are not presented to the learner simultaneously, such as in the Internet campaign management and environmental monitoring settings. Instead, in such applications, a set of options is presented sequentially to the learner within a time span, and this process is repeated throughout a time horizon. At each time, the learner is asked whether to select the proposed option or not. We define this scenario as the Sequential Pull/No-pull Bandit setting, and we propose a meta-algorithm, namely Sequential Pull/No-pull for MAB (Seq), to adapt any classical MAB policy to better suit this setting for both the regret minimization and best-arm identification problems. By allowing the selection of multiple arms within a round, the proposed meta-algorithm gathers more information, especially in the first rounds, characterized by a high uncertainty in the arms estimate value. At the same time, the adapted algorithms provide the same theoretical guarantees as the classical policy employed. The Seq meta-algorithm was extensively tested and compared with classical MAB policies on synthetic and real-world datasets from advertising and environmental monitoring applications, highlighting its good empirical performances. △ Less

Submitted 30 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

The Medical Segmentation Decathlon

Authors: Michela Antonelli, Annika Reinke, Spyridon Bakas, Keyvan Farahani, AnnetteKopp-Schneider, Bennett A. Landman, Geert Litjens, Bjoern Menze, Olaf Ronneberger, Ronald M. Summers, Bram van Ginneken, Michel Bilello, Patrick Bilic, Patrick F. Christ, Richard K. G. Do, Marc J. Gollub, Stephan H. Heckers, Henkjan Huisman, William R. Jarnagin, Maureen K. McHugo, Sandy Napel, Jennifer S. Goli Pernicka, Kawal Rhode, Catalina Tobon-Gomez, Eugene Vorontsov , et al. (34 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: International challenges have become the de facto standard for comparative assessment of image analysis algorithms given a specific task. Segmentation is so far the most widely investigated medical image processing task, but the various segmentation challenges have typically been organized in isolation, such that algorithm development was driven by the need to tackle a single specific clinical pro… ▽ More International challenges have become the de facto standard for comparative assessment of image analysis algorithms given a specific task. Segmentation is so far the most widely investigated medical image processing task, but the various segmentation challenges have typically been organized in isolation, such that algorithm development was driven by the need to tackle a single specific clinical problem. We hypothesized that a method capable of performing well on multiple tasks will generalize well to a previously unseen task and potentially outperform a custom-designed solution. To investigate the hypothesis, we organized the Medical Segmentation Decathlon (MSD) - a biomedical image analysis challenge, in which algorithms compete in a multitude of both tasks and modalities. The underlying data set was designed to explore the axis of difficulties typically encountered when dealing with medical images, such as small data sets, unbalanced labels, multi-site data and small objects. The MSD challenge confirmed that algorithms with a consistent good performance on a set of tasks preserved their good average performance on a different set of previously unseen tasks. Moreover, by monitoring the MSD winner for two years, we found that this algorithm continued generalizing well to a wide range of other clinical problems, further confirming our hypothesis. Three main conclusions can be drawn from this study: (1) state-of-the-art image segmentation algorithms are mature, accurate, and generalize well when retrained on unseen tasks; (2) consistent algorithmic performance across multiple tasks is a strong surrogate of algorithmic generalizability; (3) the training of accurate AI segmentation models is now commoditized to non AI experts. △ Less

Submitted 10 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

MSC Class: 68T07

On Measure Quantifiers in First-Order Arithmetic (Long Version)

Authors: Melissa Antonelli, Ugo Dal Lago, Paolo Pistone

Abstract: We study the logic obtained by endowing the language of first-order arithmetic with second-order measure quantifiers. This new kind of quantification allows us to express that the argument formula is true in a certain portion of all possible interpretations of the quantified variable. We show that first-order arithmetic with measure quantifiers is capable of formalizing simple results from probabi… ▽ More We study the logic obtained by endowing the language of first-order arithmetic with second-order measure quantifiers. This new kind of quantification allows us to express that the argument formula is true in a certain portion of all possible interpretations of the quantified variable. We show that first-order arithmetic with measure quantifiers is capable of formalizing simple results from probability theory and, most importantly, of representing every recursive random function. Moreover, we introduce a realizability interpretation of this logic in which programs have access to an oracle from the Cantor space. △ Less

Submitted 25 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

ACM Class: F.1.1; F.1.2; F.4.1

Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Story

Authors: Annika Reinke, Minu D. Tizabi, Carole H. Sudre, Matthias Eisenmann, Tim Rädsch, Michael Baumgartner, Laura Acion, Michela Antonelli, Tal Arbel, Spyridon Bakas, Peter Bankhead, Arriel Benis, Matthew Blaschko, Florian Buettner, M. Jorge Cardoso, Jianxu Chen, Veronika Cheplygina, Evangelia Christodoulou, Beth Cimini, Gary S. Collins, Sandy Engelhardt, Keyvan Farahani, Luciana Ferrer, Adrian Galdran, Bram van Ginneken , et al. (68 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: While the importance of automatic image analysis is continuously increasing, recent meta-research revealed major flaws with respect to algorithm validation. Performance metrics are particularly key for meaningful, objective, and transparent performance assessment and validation of the used automatic algorithms, but relatively little attention has been given to the practical pitfalls when using spe… ▽ More While the importance of automatic image analysis is continuously increasing, recent meta-research revealed major flaws with respect to algorithm validation. Performance metrics are particularly key for meaningful, objective, and transparent performance assessment and validation of the used automatic algorithms, but relatively little attention has been given to the practical pitfalls when using specific metrics for a given image analysis task. These are typically related to (1) the disregard of inherent metric properties, such as the behaviour in the presence of class imbalance or small target structures, (2) the disregard of inherent data set properties, such as the non-independence of the test cases, and (3) the disregard of the actual biomedical domain interest that the metrics should reflect. This living dynamically document has the purpose to illustrate important limitations of performance metrics commonly applied in the field of image analysis. In this context, it focuses on biomedical image analysis problems that can be phrased as image-level classification, semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, or object detection task. The current version is based on a Delphi process on metrics conducted by an international consortium of image analysis experts from more than 60 institutions worldwide. △ Less

Submitted 6 December, 2023; v1 submitted 12 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Comments: Shared first authors: Annika Reinke and Minu D. Tizabi. This is a dynamic paper on limitations of commonly used metrics. It discusses metrics for image-level classification, semantic and instance segmentation, and object detection. For missing use cases, comments or questions, please contact a.reinke@dkfz.de. Substantial contributions to this document will be acknowledged with a co-authorship

On Counting Propositional Logic

Authors: Melissa Antonelli, Ugo Dal Lago, Paolo Pistone

Abstract: We study counting propositional logic as an extension of propositional logic with counting quantifiers. We prove that the complexity of the underlying decision problem perfectly matches the appropriate level of Wagner's counting hierarchy, but also that the resulting logic admits a satisfactory proof-theoretical treatment. From the latter, a type system for a probabilistic lambda-calculus is deriv… ▽ More We study counting propositional logic as an extension of propositional logic with counting quantifiers. We prove that the complexity of the underlying decision problem perfectly matches the appropriate level of Wagner's counting hierarchy, but also that the resulting logic admits a satisfactory proof-theoretical treatment. From the latter, a type system for a probabilistic lambda-calculus is derived in the spirit of the Curry-Howard correspondence, showing the potential of counting propositional logic as a useful tool in several fields of theoretical computer science. △ Less

Submitted 3 June, 2021; v1 submitted 23 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

ACM Class: F.4.1; F.1.3; D.3.1

Accessible Data Curation and Analytics for International-Scale Citizen Science Datasets

Authors: Benjamin Murray, Eric Kerfoot, Mark S. Graham, Carole H. Sudre, Erika Molteni, Liane S. Canas, Michela Antonelli, Kerstin Klaser, Alessia Visconti, Andrew T. Chan, Paul W. Franks, Richard Davies, Jonathan Wolf, Tim Spector, Claire J. Steves, Marc Modat, Sebastien Ourselin

Abstract: The Covid Symptom Study, a smartphone-based surveillance study on COVID-19 symptoms in the population, is an exemplar of big data citizen science. Over 4.7 million participants and 189 million unique assessments have been logged since its introduction in March 2020. The success of the Covid Symptom Study creates technical challenges around effective data curation for two reasons. Firstly, the scal… ▽ More The Covid Symptom Study, a smartphone-based surveillance study on COVID-19 symptoms in the population, is an exemplar of big data citizen science. Over 4.7 million participants and 189 million unique assessments have been logged since its introduction in March 2020. The success of the Covid Symptom Study creates technical challenges around effective data curation for two reasons. Firstly, the scale of the dataset means that it can no longer be easily processed using standard software on commodity hardware. Secondly, the size of the research group means that replicability and consistency of key analytics used across multiple publications becomes an issue. We present ExeTera, an open source data curation software designed to address scalability challenges and to enable reproducible research across an international research group for datasets such as the Covid Symptom Study dataset. △ Less

Submitted 17 February, 2021; v1 submitted 2 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

ACM Class: D.m; E.2; H.3.3; I.7

A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithms

Authors: Amber L. Simpson, Michela Antonelli, Spyridon Bakas, Michel Bilello, Keyvan Farahani, Bram van Ginneken, Annette Kopp-Schneider, Bennett A. Landman, Geert Litjens, Bjoern Menze, Olaf Ronneberger, Ronald M. Summers, Patrick Bilic, Patrick F. Christ, Richard K. G. Do, Marc Gollub, Jennifer Golia-Pernicka, Stephan H. Heckers, William R. Jarnagin, Maureen K. McHugo, Sandy Napel, Eugene Vorontsov, Lena Maier-Hein, M. Jorge Cardoso

Abstract: Semantic segmentation of medical images aims to associate a pixel with a label in a medical image without human initialization. The success of semantic segmentation algorithms is contingent on the availability of high-quality imaging data with corresponding labels provided by experts. We sought to create a large collection of annotated medical image datasets of various clinically relevant anatomie… ▽ More Semantic segmentation of medical images aims to associate a pixel with a label in a medical image without human initialization. The success of semantic segmentation algorithms is contingent on the availability of high-quality imaging data with corresponding labels provided by experts. We sought to create a large collection of annotated medical image datasets of various clinically relevant anatomies available under open source license to facilitate the development of semantic segmentation algorithms. Such a resource would allow: 1) objective assessment of general-purpose segmentation methods through comprehensive benchmarking and 2) open and free access to medical image data for any researcher interested in the problem domain. Through a multi-institutional effort, we generated a large, curated dataset representative of several highly variable segmentation tasks that was used in a crowd-sourced challenge - the Medical Segmentation Decathlon held during the 2018 Medical Image Computing and Computer Aided Interventions Conference in Granada, Spain. Here, we describe these ten labeled image datasets so that these data may be effectively reused by the research community. △ Less

Submitted 24 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)

Authors: Patrick Bilic, Patrick Christ, Hongwei Bran Li, Eugene Vorontsov, Avi Ben-Cohen, Georgios Kaissis, Adi Szeskin, Colin Jacobs, Gabriel Efrain Humpire Mamani, Gabriel Chartrand, Fabian Lohöfer, Julian Walter Holch, Wieland Sommer, Felix Hofmann, Alexandre Hostettler, Naama Lev-Cohain, Michal Drozdzal, Michal Marianne Amitai, Refael Vivantik, Jacob Sosna, Ivan Ezhov, Anjany Sekuboyina, Fernando Navarro, Florian Kofler, Johannes C. Paetzold , et al. (84 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: In this work, we report the set-up and results of the Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS), which was organized in conjunction with the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2017 and the International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2017 and 2018. The image dataset is diverse and contains primary and secondary tumors with… ▽ More In this work, we report the set-up and results of the Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS), which was organized in conjunction with the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2017 and the International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2017 and 2018. The image dataset is diverse and contains primary and secondary tumors with varied sizes and appearances with various lesion-to-background levels (hyper-/hypo-dense), created in collaboration with seven hospitals and research institutions. Seventy-five submitted liver and liver tumor segmentation algorithms were trained on a set of 131 computed tomography (CT) volumes and were tested on 70 unseen test images acquired from different patients. We found that not a single algorithm performed best for both liver and liver tumors in the three events. The best liver segmentation algorithm achieved a Dice score of 0.963, whereas, for tumor segmentation, the best algorithms achieved Dices scores of 0.674 (ISBI 2017), 0.702 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.739 (MICCAI 2018). Retrospectively, we performed additional analysis on liver tumor detection and revealed that not all top-performing segmentation algorithms worked well for tumor detection. The best liver tumor detection method achieved a lesion-wise recall of 0.458 (ISBI 2017), 0.515 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.554 (MICCAI 2018), indicating the need for further research. LiTS remains an active benchmark and resource for research, e.g., contributing the liver-related segmentation tasks in \url{http://medicaldecathlon.com/}. In addition, both data and online evaluation are accessible via \url{www.lits-challenge.com}. △ Less

Submitted 25 November, 2022; v1 submitted 13 January, 2019; originally announced January 2019.

Comments: Patrick Bilic, Patrick Christ, Hongwei Bran Li, and Eugene Vorontsov made equal contributions to this work. Published in Medical Image Analysis

Journal ref: Medical Image Analysis (2022) Pg. 102680

Developing and Assessing MATLAB Exercises for Active Concept Learning

Authors: S. H. Song, Marco Antonelli, Tony Fung, Brandon D. Armstrong, Amy Chong, Albert Lo, Bertram E. Shi

Abstract: New technologies, such as MOOCs, provide innovative methods to tackle new challenges in teaching and learning, such as globalization and changing contemporary culture and to remove the limits of conventional classrooms. However, they also bring challenges in course delivery and assessment, due to factors such as less direct student-instructor interaction. These challenges are especially severe in… ▽ More New technologies, such as MOOCs, provide innovative methods to tackle new challenges in teaching and learning, such as globalization and changing contemporary culture and to remove the limits of conventional classrooms. However, they also bring challenges in course delivery and assessment, due to factors such as less direct student-instructor interaction. These challenges are especially severe in engineering education, which relies heavily on experiential learning, such as computer simulations and laboratory exercises, to assist students in understanding concepts. As a result, effective design of experiential learning components is extremely critical for engineering MOOCs. In this paper, we will share our experience gained through developing and offering a MOOC on communication systems, with special focus on the development and assessment of MATLAB exercises for active concept learning. Our approach introduced students to concepts using learning components commonly provided by many MOOC platforms (e.g., online lectures and quizzes), and augmented the student experience with MATLAB based computer simulations and exercises to enable more concrete and detailed understanding of the material. We describe here a systematic approach to MATLAB problem design and assessment, based on our experience with the MATLAB server provided by MathWorks and integrated with the edX MOOC platform. We discuss the effectiveness of the instructional methods as evaluated through students' learning performance. We analyze the impact of the course design tools from both the instructor and the student perspective. △ Less

Submitted 23 October, 2016; originally announced October 2016.

Comments: Submitted to IEEE Transactions on Education