Answering real-world clinical questions using large language model based systems
Authors:
Yen Sia Low,
Michael L. Jackson,
Rebecca J. Hyde,
Robert E. Brown,
Neil M. Sanghavi,
Julian D. Baldwin,
C. William Pike,
Jananee Muralidharan,
Gavin Hui,
Natasha Alexander,
Hadeel Hassan,
Rahul V. Nene,
Morgan Pike,
Courtney J. Pokrzywa,
Shivam Vedak,
Adam Paul Yan,
Dong-han Yao,
Amy R. Zipursky,
Christina Dinh,
Philip Ballentine,
Dan C. Derieg,
Vladimir Polony,
Rehan N. Chawdry,
Jordan Davies,
Brigham B. Hyde
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Evidence to guide healthcare decisions is often limited by a lack of relevant and trustworthy literature as well as difficulty in contextualizing existing research for a specific patient. Large language models (LLMs) could potentially address both challenges by either summarizing published literature or generating new studies based on real-world data (RWD). We evaluated the ability of five LLM-bas…
▽ More
Evidence to guide healthcare decisions is often limited by a lack of relevant and trustworthy literature as well as difficulty in contextualizing existing research for a specific patient. Large language models (LLMs) could potentially address both challenges by either summarizing published literature or generating new studies based on real-world data (RWD). We evaluated the ability of five LLM-based systems in answering 50 clinical questions and had nine independent physicians review the responses for relevance, reliability, and actionability. As it stands, general-purpose LLMs (ChatGPT-4, Claude 3 Opus, Gemini Pro 1.5) rarely produced answers that were deemed relevant and evidence-based (2% - 10%). In contrast, retrieval augmented generation (RAG)-based and agentic LLM systems produced relevant and evidence-based answers for 24% (OpenEvidence) to 58% (ChatRWD) of questions. Only the agentic ChatRWD was able to answer novel questions compared to other LLMs (65% vs. 0-9%). These results suggest that while general-purpose LLMs should not be used as-is, a purpose-built system for evidence summarization based on RAG and one for generating novel evidence working synergistically would improve availability of pertinent evidence for patient care.
△ Less
Submitted 29 June, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
An Investigation of Multi-feature Extraction and Super-resolution with Fast Microphone Arrays
Authors:
Eric T. Chang,
Runsheng Wang,
Peter Ballentine,
Jingxi Xu,
Trey Smith,
Brian Coltin,
Ioannis Kymissis,
Matei Ciocarlie
Abstract:
In this work, we use MEMS microphones as vibration sensors to simultaneously classify texture and estimate contact position and velocity. Vibration sensors are an important facet of both human and robotic tactile sensing, providing fast detection of contact and onset of slip. Microphones are an attractive option for implementing vibration sensing as they offer a fast response and can be sampled qu…
▽ More
In this work, we use MEMS microphones as vibration sensors to simultaneously classify texture and estimate contact position and velocity. Vibration sensors are an important facet of both human and robotic tactile sensing, providing fast detection of contact and onset of slip. Microphones are an attractive option for implementing vibration sensing as they offer a fast response and can be sampled quickly, are affordable, and occupy a very small footprint. Our prototype sensor uses only a sparse array (8-9 mm spacing) of distributed MEMS microphones (<$1, 3.76 x 2.95 x 1.10 mm) embedded under an elastomer. We use transformer-based architectures for data analysis, taking advantage of the microphones' high sampling rate to run our models on time-series data as opposed to individual snapshots. This approach allows us to obtain 77.3% average accuracy on 4-class texture classification (84.2% when excluding the slowest drag velocity), 1.8 mm mean error on contact localization, and 5.6 mm/s mean error on contact velocity. We show that the learned texture and localization models are robust to varying velocity and generalize to unseen velocities. We also report that our sensor provides fast contact detection, an important advantage of fast transducers. This investigation illustrates the capabilities one can achieve with a MEMS microphone array alone, leaving valuable sensor real estate available for integration with complementary tactile sensing modalities.
△ Less
Submitted 7 March, 2024; v1 submitted 29 September, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
