-
Confidence-Building Measures for Artificial Intelligence: Workshop Proceedings
Authors:
Sarah Shoker,
Andrew Reddie,
Sarah Barrington,
Ruby Booth,
Miles Brundage,
Husanjot Chahal,
Michael Depp,
Bill Drexel,
Ritwik Gupta,
Marina Favaro,
Jake Hecla,
Alan Hickey,
Margarita Konaev,
Kirthi Kumar,
Nathan Lambert,
Andrew Lohn,
Cullen O'Keefe,
Nazneen Rajani,
Michael Sellitto,
Robert Trager,
Leah Walker,
Alexa Wehsener,
Jessica Young
Abstract:
Foundation models could eventually introduce several pathways for undermining state security: accidents, inadvertent escalation, unintentional conflict, the proliferation of weapons, and the interference with human diplomacy are just a few on a long list. The Confidence-Building Measures for Artificial Intelligence workshop hosted by the Geopolitics Team at OpenAI and the Berkeley Risk and Securit…
▽ More
Foundation models could eventually introduce several pathways for undermining state security: accidents, inadvertent escalation, unintentional conflict, the proliferation of weapons, and the interference with human diplomacy are just a few on a long list. The Confidence-Building Measures for Artificial Intelligence workshop hosted by the Geopolitics Team at OpenAI and the Berkeley Risk and Security Lab at the University of California brought together a multistakeholder group to think through the tools and strategies to mitigate the potential risks introduced by foundation models to international security. Originating in the Cold War, confidence-building measures (CBMs) are actions that reduce hostility, prevent conflict escalation, and improve trust between parties. The flexibility of CBMs make them a key instrument for navigating the rapid changes in the foundation model landscape. Participants identified the following CBMs that directly apply to foundation models and which are further explained in this conference proceedings: 1. crisis hotlines 2. incident sharing 3. model, transparency, and system cards 4. content provenance and watermarks 5. collaborative red teaming and table-top exercises and 6. dataset and evaluation sharing. Because most foundation model developers are non-government entities, many CBMs will need to involve a wider stakeholder community. These measures can be implemented either by AI labs or by relevant government actors.
△ Less
Submitted 3 August, 2023; v1 submitted 1 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Single and Multi-Speaker Cloned Voice Detection: From Perceptual to Learned Features
Authors:
Sarah Barrington,
Romit Barua,
Gautham Koorma,
Hany Farid
Abstract:
Synthetic-voice cloning technologies have seen significant advances in recent years, giving rise to a range of potential harms. From small- and large-scale financial fraud to disinformation campaigns, the need for reliable methods to differentiate real and synthesized voices is imperative. We describe three techniques for differentiating a real from a cloned voice designed to impersonate a specifi…
▽ More
Synthetic-voice cloning technologies have seen significant advances in recent years, giving rise to a range of potential harms. From small- and large-scale financial fraud to disinformation campaigns, the need for reliable methods to differentiate real and synthesized voices is imperative. We describe three techniques for differentiating a real from a cloned voice designed to impersonate a specific person. These three approaches differ in their feature extraction stage with low-dimensional perceptual features offering high interpretability but lower accuracy, to generic spectral features, and end-to-end learned features offering less interpretability but higher accuracy. We show the efficacy of these approaches when trained on a single speaker's voice and when trained on multiple voices. The learned features consistently yield an equal error rate between 0% and 4%, and are reasonably robust to adversarial laundering.
△ Less
Submitted 27 September, 2023; v1 submitted 14 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
The Feasibility of Algorithmic Detection and Decentralised Moderation for Protecting Women from Online Abuse
Authors:
Sarah Barrington
Abstract:
Online abuse is becoming an increasingly prevalent issue in modern-day society, with 41 percent of Americans having experienced online harassment in some capacity in 2021. People who identify as women, in particular, can be subjected to a wide range of abusive behavior online, with gender-specific experiences cited broadly in recent literature across fields such as blogging, politics, and journali…
▽ More
Online abuse is becoming an increasingly prevalent issue in modern-day society, with 41 percent of Americans having experienced online harassment in some capacity in 2021. People who identify as women, in particular, can be subjected to a wide range of abusive behavior online, with gender-specific experiences cited broadly in recent literature across fields such as blogging, politics, and journalism. In response to this rise in abusive content, platforms have been found to largely employ "individualistic moderation" approaches, aiming to protect users from harmful content through the screening and management of singular interactions or accounts. Yet, previous work performed by the author of this paper has shown that in the cases of women in particular, these approaches can often be ineffective; failing to protect users from multi-dimensional abuse spanning prolonged time periods, different platforms, and varying interaction types. In recognition of its increasing complexity, platforms are beginning to outsource content moderation to users in a new and decentralized approach. The goal of this research is to examine the feasibility of using multidimensional abuse indicators in a Twitter-based moderation algorithm aiming to protect women from female-targeted online abuse. This research outlines three indicators of multidimensional abuse, explores how these indicators can be extracted as features from Twitter data, and proposes a technical framework for deploying an end-to-end moderation algorithm using these features.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
The Fungibility of Non-Fungible Tokens: A Quantitative Analysis of ERC-721 Metadata
Authors:
Sarah Barrington,
Nick Merrill
Abstract:
Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs), digital certificates of ownership for virtual art, have until recently been traded on a highly lucrative and speculative market. Yet, an emergence of misconceptions, along with a sustained market downtime, are calling the value of NFTs into question. This project (1) describes three properties that any valuable NFT should possess (permanence, immutability and uniqueness…
▽ More
Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs), digital certificates of ownership for virtual art, have until recently been traded on a highly lucrative and speculative market. Yet, an emergence of misconceptions, along with a sustained market downtime, are calling the value of NFTs into question. This project (1) describes three properties that any valuable NFT should possess (permanence, immutability and uniqueness), (2) creates a quantitative summary of permanence as an initial criteria, and (3) tests our measures on 6 months of NFTs on the Ethereum blockchain, finding 45% of ERC721 tokens in our corpus do not satisfy this initial criteria. Our work could help buyers and marketplaces identify and warn users against purchasing NFTs that may be overvalued.
△ Less
Submitted 28 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
The Role of Metadata in Non-Fungible Tokens: Marketplace Analysis and Collection Organization
Authors:
Sarah Barrington
Abstract:
An explosion of interest in Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) has led to the emergence of vibrant online marketplaces that enable users to buy, sell and create digital assets. Largely considered contractual representations of digital artworks, NFTs allow ownership and authenticity to be proven through storing an asset and its associated metadata on a Blockchain. Yet, variation exists between chains, toke…
▽ More
An explosion of interest in Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) has led to the emergence of vibrant online marketplaces that enable users to buy, sell and create digital assets. Largely considered contractual representations of digital artworks, NFTs allow ownership and authenticity to be proven through storing an asset and its associated metadata on a Blockchain. Yet, variation exists between chains, token protocols (such as the ERC-721 NFT standard) and marketplaces, leading to inconsistencies in the definitions and roles of token metadata. This research thus aims to define metadata in the context of NFTs, explore the boundary of metadata and asset data within tokens, and understand the variances and impacts these structures have on the curation of NFTs within online marketplaces and collections.
△ Less
Submitted 28 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
