User Intent Recognition and Satisfaction with Large Language Models: A User Study with ChatGPT
Authors:
Anna Bodonhelyi,
Efe Bozkir,
Shuo Yang,
Enkelejda Kasneci,
Gjergji Kasneci
Abstract:
The rapid evolution of large language models such as GPT-4 Turbo represents an impactful paradigm shift in digital interaction and content engagement. While these models encode vast amounts of human-generated knowledge and excel in processing diverse data types, recent research shows that they often face the challenge of accurately responding to specific user intents, leading to increased user dis…
▽ More
The rapid evolution of large language models such as GPT-4 Turbo represents an impactful paradigm shift in digital interaction and content engagement. While these models encode vast amounts of human-generated knowledge and excel in processing diverse data types, recent research shows that they often face the challenge of accurately responding to specific user intents, leading to increased user dissatisfaction. Based on a fine-grained intent taxonomy and intent-based prompt reformulations, we analyze (1) the quality of intent recognition and (2) user satisfaction with answers from intent-based prompt reformulations for two recent ChatGPT models, GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4 Turbo. The results reveal that GPT-4 outperforms GPT-3.5 on the recognition of common intents, but is conversely often outperformed by GPT-3.5 on the recognition of less frequent intents. Moreover, whenever the user intent is correctly recognized, while users are more satisfied with the answers to intent-based reformulations of GPT 4 compared to GPT-3.5, they tend to be more satisfied with the answers of the models to their original prompts compared to the reformulated ones. Finally, the study indicates that users can quickly learn to formulate their prompts more effectively, once they are shown possible reformulation templates.
△ Less
Submitted 3 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
TurboSVM-FL: Boosting Federated Learning through SVM Aggregation for Lazy Clients
Authors:
Mengdi Wang,
Anna Bodonhelyi,
Efe Bozkir,
Enkelejda Kasneci
Abstract:
Federated learning is a distributed collaborative machine learning paradigm that has gained strong momentum in recent years. In federated learning, a central server periodically coordinates models with clients and aggregates the models trained locally by clients without necessitating access to local data. Despite its potential, the implementation of federated learning continues to encounter severa…
▽ More
Federated learning is a distributed collaborative machine learning paradigm that has gained strong momentum in recent years. In federated learning, a central server periodically coordinates models with clients and aggregates the models trained locally by clients without necessitating access to local data. Despite its potential, the implementation of federated learning continues to encounter several challenges, predominantly the slow convergence that is largely due to data heterogeneity. The slow convergence becomes particularly problematic in cross-device federated learning scenarios where clients may be strongly limited by computing power and storage space, and hence counteracting methods that induce additional computation or memory cost on the client side such as auxiliary objective terms and larger training iterations can be impractical. In this paper, we propose a novel federated aggregation strategy, TurboSVM-FL, that poses no additional computation burden on the client side and can significantly accelerate convergence for federated classification task, especially when clients are "lazy" and train their models solely for few epochs for next global aggregation. TurboSVM-FL extensively utilizes support vector machine to conduct selective aggregation and max-margin spread-out regularization on class embeddings. We evaluate TurboSVM-FL on multiple datasets including FEMNIST, CelebA, and Shakespeare using user-independent validation with non-iid data distribution. Our results show that TurboSVM-FL can significantly outperform existing popular algorithms on convergence rate and reduce communication rounds while delivering better test metrics including accuracy, F1 score, and MCC.
△ Less
Submitted 11 February, 2024; v1 submitted 22 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
