-
The Evolution of Language in Social Media Comments
Authors:
Niccolò Di Marco,
Edoardo Loru,
Anita Bonetti,
Alessandra Olga Grazia Serra,
Matteo Cinelli,
Walter Quattrociocchi
Abstract:
Understanding the impact of digital platforms on user behavior presents foundational challenges, including issues related to polarization, misinformation dynamics, and variation in news consumption. Comparative analyses across platforms and over different years can provide critical insights into these phenomena. This study investigates the linguistic characteristics of user comments over 34 years,…
▽ More
Understanding the impact of digital platforms on user behavior presents foundational challenges, including issues related to polarization, misinformation dynamics, and variation in news consumption. Comparative analyses across platforms and over different years can provide critical insights into these phenomena. This study investigates the linguistic characteristics of user comments over 34 years, focusing on their complexity and temporal shifts. Utilizing a dataset of approximately 300 million English comments from eight diverse platforms and topics, we examine the vocabulary size and linguistic richness of user communications and their evolution over time. Our findings reveal consistent patterns of complexity across social media platforms and topics, characterized by a nearly universal reduction in text length, diminished lexical richness, but decreased repetitiveness. Despite these trends, users consistently introduce new words into their comments at a nearly constant rate. This analysis underscores that platforms only partially influence the complexity of user comments. Instead, it reflects a broader, universal pattern of human behaviour, suggesting intrinsic linguistic tendencies of users when interacting online.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2024; v1 submitted 17 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Improved path planning algorithms for non-holonomic autonomous vehicles in industrial environments with narrow corridors: Roadmap Hybrid A* and Waypoints Hybrid B*. Roadmap hybrid A* and Waypoints hybrid A* Pseudocodes
Authors:
Alessandro Bonetti,
Simone Guidetti,
Lorenzo Sabattini
Abstract:
This paper proposes two novel path planning algorithms, Roadmap Hybrid A* and Waypoints Hybrid A*, for car-like autonomous vehicles in logistics and industrial contexts with obstacles (e.g., pallets or containers) and narrow corridors. Roadmap Hybrid A* combines Hybrid A* with a graph search algorithm applied to a static roadmap. The former enables obstacle avoidance and flexibility, whereas the l…
▽ More
This paper proposes two novel path planning algorithms, Roadmap Hybrid A* and Waypoints Hybrid A*, for car-like autonomous vehicles in logistics and industrial contexts with obstacles (e.g., pallets or containers) and narrow corridors. Roadmap Hybrid A* combines Hybrid A* with a graph search algorithm applied to a static roadmap. The former enables obstacle avoidance and flexibility, whereas the latter provides greater robustness, repeatability, and computational speed. Waypoint Hybrid A*, on the other hand, generates waypoints using a topological map of the environment to guide Hybrid A* to the target pose, reducing complexity and search time. Both algorithms enable predetermined control over the shape of desired parts of the path, for example, to obtain precise docking maneuvers to service machines and to eliminate unnecessary steering changes produced by Hybrid A* in corridors, thanks to the roadmap and/or the waypoints. To evaluate the performance of these algorithms, we conducted a simulation study in an industrial plant where a robot must navigate narrow corridors to serve machines in different areas. In terms of computational time, total length, reverse length path, and other metrics, both algorithms outperformed the standard Hybrid A*.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
A Construction Kit for Efficient Low Power Neural Network Accelerator Designs
Authors:
Petar Jokic,
Erfan Azarkhish,
Andrea Bonetti,
Marc Pons,
Stephane Emery,
Luca Benini
Abstract:
Implementing embedded neural network processing at the edge requires efficient hardware acceleration that couples high computational performance with low power consumption. Driven by the rapid evolution of network architectures and their algorithmic features, accelerator designs are constantly updated and improved. To evaluate and compare hardware design choices, designers can refer to a myriad of…
▽ More
Implementing embedded neural network processing at the edge requires efficient hardware acceleration that couples high computational performance with low power consumption. Driven by the rapid evolution of network architectures and their algorithmic features, accelerator designs are constantly updated and improved. To evaluate and compare hardware design choices, designers can refer to a myriad of accelerator implementations in the literature. Surveys provide an overview of these works but are often limited to system-level and benchmark-specific performance metrics, making it difficult to quantitatively compare the individual effect of each utilized optimization technique. This complicates the evaluation of optimizations for new accelerator designs, slowing-down the research progress. This work provides a survey of neural network accelerator optimization approaches that have been used in recent works and reports their individual effects on edge processing performance. It presents the list of optimizations and their quantitative effects as a construction kit, allowing to assess the design choices for each building block separately. Reported optimizations range from up to 10'000x memory savings to 33x energy reductions, providing chip designers an overview of design choices for implementing efficient low power neural network accelerators.
△ Less
Submitted 24 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
PolarBear: A 28-nm FD-SOI ASIC for Decoding of Polar Codes
Authors:
Pascal Giard,
Alexios Balatsoukas-Stimming,
Thomas Christoph Müller,
Andrea Bonetti,
Claude Thibeault,
Warren J. Gross,
Philippe Flatresse,
Andreas Burg
Abstract:
Polar codes are a recently proposed class of block codes that provably achieve the capacity of various communication channels. They received a lot of attention as they can do so with low-complexity encoding and decoding algorithms, and they have an explicit construction. Their recent inclusion in a 5G communication standard will only spur more research. However, only a couple of ASICs featuring de…
▽ More
Polar codes are a recently proposed class of block codes that provably achieve the capacity of various communication channels. They received a lot of attention as they can do so with low-complexity encoding and decoding algorithms, and they have an explicit construction. Their recent inclusion in a 5G communication standard will only spur more research. However, only a couple of ASICs featuring decoders for polar codes were fabricated, and none of them implements a list-based decoding algorithm. In this paper, we present ASIC measurement results for a fabricated 28 nm CMOS chip that implements two different decoders: the first decoder is tailored toward error-correction performance and flexibility. It supports any code rate as well as three different decoding algorithms: successive cancellation (SC), SC flip and SC list (SCL). The flexible decoder can also decode both non-systematic and systematic polar codes. The second decoder targets speed and energy efficiency. We present measurement results for the first silicon-proven SCL decoder, where its coded throughput is shown to be of 306.8 Mbps with a latency of 3.34 us and an energy per bit of 418.3 pJ/bit at a clock frequency of 721 MHz for a supply of 1.3 V. The energy per bit drops down to 178.1 pJ/bit with a more modest clock frequency of 308 MHz, lower throughput of 130.9 Mbps and a reduced supply voltage of 0.9 V. For the other two operating modes, the energy per bit is shown to be of approximately 95 pJ/bit. The less flexible high-throughput unrolled decoder can achieve a coded throughput of 9.2 Gbps and a latency of 628 ns for a measured energy per bit of 1.15 pJ/bit at 451 MHz.
△ Less
Submitted 1 September, 2017; v1 submitted 31 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
