Showing 1–34 of 34 results for author: Bos, J

Scope-enhanced Compositional Semantic Parsing for DRT

Authors: Xiulin Yang, Jonas Groschwitz, Alexander Koller, Johan Bos

Abstract: Discourse Representation Theory (DRT) distinguishes itself from other semantic representation frameworks by its ability to model complex semantic and discourse phenomena through structural nesting and variable binding. While seq2seq models hold the state of the art on DRT parsing, their accuracy degrades with the complexity of the sentence, and they sometimes struggle to produce well-formed DRT re… ▽ More Discourse Representation Theory (DRT) distinguishes itself from other semantic representation frameworks by its ability to model complex semantic and discourse phenomena through structural nesting and variable binding. While seq2seq models hold the state of the art on DRT parsing, their accuracy degrades with the complexity of the sentence, and they sometimes struggle to produce well-formed DRT representations. We introduce the AMS parser, a compositional, neurosymbolic semantic parser for DRT. It rests on a novel mechanism for predicting quantifier scope. We show that the AMS parser reliably produces well-formed outputs and performs well on DRT parsing, especially on complex sentences. △ Less

Submitted 1 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Neural Semantic Parsing with Extremely Rich Symbolic Meaning Representations

Authors: Xiao Zhang, Gosse Bouma, Johan Bos

Abstract: Current open-domain neural semantics parsers show impressive performance. However, closer inspection of the symbolic meaning representations they produce reveals significant weaknesses: sometimes they tend to merely copy character sequences from the source text to form symbolic concepts, defaulting to the most frequent word sense based in the training distribution. By leveraging the hierarchical s… ▽ More Current open-domain neural semantics parsers show impressive performance. However, closer inspection of the symbolic meaning representations they produce reveals significant weaknesses: sometimes they tend to merely copy character sequences from the source text to form symbolic concepts, defaulting to the most frequent word sense based in the training distribution. By leveraging the hierarchical structure of a lexical ontology, we introduce a novel compositional symbolic representation for concepts based on their position in the taxonomical hierarchy. This representation provides richer semantic information and enhances interpretability. We introduce a neural "taxonomical" semantic parser to utilize this new representation system of predicates, and compare it with a standard neural semantic parser trained on the traditional meaning representation format, employing a novel challenge set and evaluation metric for evaluation. Our experimental findings demonstrate that the taxonomical model, trained on much richer and complex meaning representations, is slightly subordinate in performance to the traditional model using the standard metrics for evaluation, but outperforms it when dealing with out-of-vocabulary concepts. This finding is encouraging for research in computational semantics that aims to combine data-driven distributional meanings with knowledge-based symbolic representations. △ Less

Submitted 19 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: This manuscript has been submitted to Computational Linguistics journal on 2024-03-15

Gaining More Insight into Neural Semantic Parsing with Challenging Benchmarks

Authors: Xiao Zhang, Chunliu Wang, Rik van Noord, Johan Bos

Abstract: The Parallel Meaning Bank (PMB) serves as a corpus for semantic processing with a focus on semantic parsing and text generation. Currently, we witness an excellent performance of neural parsers and generators on the PMB. This might suggest that such semantic processing tasks have by and large been solved. We argue that this is not the case and that performance scores from the past on the PMB are i… ▽ More The Parallel Meaning Bank (PMB) serves as a corpus for semantic processing with a focus on semantic parsing and text generation. Currently, we witness an excellent performance of neural parsers and generators on the PMB. This might suggest that such semantic processing tasks have by and large been solved. We argue that this is not the case and that performance scores from the past on the PMB are inflated by non-optimal data splits and test sets that are too easy. In response, we introduce several changes. First, instead of the prior random split, we propose a more systematic splitting approach to improve the reliability of the standard test data. Second, except for the standard test set, we also propose two challenge sets: one with longer texts including discourse structure, and one that addresses compositional generalization. We evaluate five neural models for semantic parsing and meaning-to-text generation. Our results show that model performance declines (in some cases dramatically) on the challenge sets, revealing the limitations of neural models when confronting such challenges. △ Less

Submitted 7 May, 2024; v1 submitted 12 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Controlling Topic-Focus Articulation in Meaning-to-Text Generation using Graph Neural Networks

Authors: Chunliu Wang, Rik van Noord, Johan Bos

Abstract: A bare meaning representation can be expressed in various ways using natural language, depending on how the information is structured on the surface level. We are interested in finding ways to control topic-focus articulation when generating text from meaning. We focus on distinguishing active and passive voice for sentences with transitive verbs. The idea is to add pragmatic information such as t… ▽ More A bare meaning representation can be expressed in various ways using natural language, depending on how the information is structured on the surface level. We are interested in finding ways to control topic-focus articulation when generating text from meaning. We focus on distinguishing active and passive voice for sentences with transitive verbs. The idea is to add pragmatic information such as topic to the meaning representation, thereby forcing either active or passive voice when given to a natural language generation system. We use graph neural models because there is no explicit information about word order in a meaning represented by a graph. We try three different methods for topic-focus articulation (TFA) employing graph neural models for a meaning-to-text generation task. We propose a novel encoding strategy about node aggregation in graph neural models, which instead of traditional encoding by aggregating adjacent node information, learns node representations by using depth-first search. The results show our approach can get competitive performance with state-of-art graph models on general text generation, and lead to significant improvements on the task of active-passive conversion compared to traditional adjacency-based aggregation strategies. Different types of TFA can have a huge impact on the performance of the graph models. △ Less

Submitted 3 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Discourse Representation Structure Parsing for Chinese

Authors: Chunliu Wang, Xiao Zhang, Johan Bos

Abstract: Previous work has predominantly focused on monolingual English semantic parsing. We, instead, explore the feasibility of Chinese semantic parsing in the absence of labeled data for Chinese meaning representations. We describe the pipeline of automatically collecting the linearized Chinese meaning representation data for sequential-to sequential neural networks. We further propose a test suite desi… ▽ More Previous work has predominantly focused on monolingual English semantic parsing. We, instead, explore the feasibility of Chinese semantic parsing in the absence of labeled data for Chinese meaning representations. We describe the pipeline of automatically collecting the linearized Chinese meaning representation data for sequential-to sequential neural networks. We further propose a test suite designed explicitly for Chinese semantic parsing, which provides fine-grained evaluation for parsing performance, where we aim to study Chinese parsing difficulties. Our experimental results show that the difficulty of Chinese semantic parsing is mainly caused by adverbs. Realizing Chinese parsing through machine translation and an English parser yields slightly lower performance than training a model directly on Chinese data. △ Less

Submitted 16 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: NATURAL LOGIC MEETS MACHINE LEARNING IV Workshop

Pre-Trained Language-Meaning Models for Multilingual Parsing and Generation

Authors: Chunliu Wang, Huiyuan Lai, Malvina Nissim, Johan Bos

Abstract: Pre-trained language models (PLMs) have achieved great success in NLP and have recently been used for tasks in computational semantics. However, these tasks do not fully benefit from PLMs since meaning representations are not explicitly included in the pre-training stage. We introduce multilingual pre-trained language-meaning models based on Discourse Representation Structures (DRSs), including me… ▽ More Pre-trained language models (PLMs) have achieved great success in NLP and have recently been used for tasks in computational semantics. However, these tasks do not fully benefit from PLMs since meaning representations are not explicitly included in the pre-training stage. We introduce multilingual pre-trained language-meaning models based on Discourse Representation Structures (DRSs), including meaning representations besides natural language texts in the same model, and design a new strategy to reduce the gap between the pre-training and fine-tuning objectives. Since DRSs are language neutral, cross-lingual transfer learning is adopted to further improve the performance of non-English tasks. Automatic evaluation results show that our approach achieves the best performance on both the multilingual DRS parsing and DRS-to-text generation tasks. Correlation analysis between automatic metrics and human judgements on the generation task further validates the effectiveness of our model. Human inspection reveals that out-of-vocabulary tokens are the main cause of erroneous results. △ Less

Submitted 31 May, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: Accepted by ACL2023 findings

What's the Meaning of Superhuman Performance in Today's NLU?

Authors: Simone Tedeschi, Johan Bos, Thierry Declerck, Jan Hajic, Daniel Hershcovich, Eduard H. Hovy, Alexander Koller, Simon Krek, Steven Schockaert, Rico Sennrich, Ekaterina Shutova, Roberto Navigli

Abstract: In the last five years, there has been a significant focus in Natural Language Processing (NLP) on developing larger Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) and introducing benchmarks such as SuperGLUE and SQuAD to measure their abilities in language understanding, reasoning, and reading comprehension. These PLMs have achieved impressive results on these benchmarks, even surpassing human performance in… ▽ More In the last five years, there has been a significant focus in Natural Language Processing (NLP) on developing larger Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) and introducing benchmarks such as SuperGLUE and SQuAD to measure their abilities in language understanding, reasoning, and reading comprehension. These PLMs have achieved impressive results on these benchmarks, even surpassing human performance in some cases. This has led to claims of superhuman capabilities and the provocative idea that certain tasks have been solved. In this position paper, we take a critical look at these claims and ask whether PLMs truly have superhuman abilities and what the current benchmarks are really evaluating. We show that these benchmarks have serious limitations affecting the comparison between humans and PLMs and provide recommendations for fairer and more transparent benchmarks. △ Less

Submitted 15 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: 9 pages, long paper at ACL 2023 proceedings

LaTeX, metadata, and publishing workflows

Authors: Joppe W. Bos, Kevin S. McCurley

Abstract: The field of scientific publishing that is served by LaTeX is increasingly dependent on the availability of metadata about publications. We discuss how to use LaTeX classes and BibTeX styles to curate metadata throughout the life cycle of a published article. Our focus is on streamlining and automating much of publishing workflow. We survey the various options and drawbacks of the existing approac… ▽ More The field of scientific publishing that is served by LaTeX is increasingly dependent on the availability of metadata about publications. We discuss how to use LaTeX classes and BibTeX styles to curate metadata throughout the life cycle of a published article. Our focus is on streamlining and automating much of publishing workflow. We survey the various options and drawbacks of the existing approaches and outline our approach as applied in a new LaTeX style file where we have as main goal to make it easier for authors to specify their metadata only once and use this throughout the entire publishing pipeline. We believe this can help to reduce the cost of publishing, by reducing the amount of human effort required for editing and providing of publication metadata. △ Less

Submitted 9 April, 2023; v1 submitted 19 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

DSOR: A Scalable Statistical Filter for Removing Falling Snow from LiDAR Point Clouds in Severe Winter Weather

Authors: Akhil Kurup, Jeremy Bos

Abstract: For autonomous vehicles to viably replace human drivers they must contend with inclement weather. Falling rain and snow introduce noise in LiDAR returns resulting in both false positive and false negative object detections. In this article we introduce the Winter Adverse Driving dataSet (WADS) collected in the snow belt region of Michigan's Upper Peninsula. WADS is the first multi-modal dataset fe… ▽ More For autonomous vehicles to viably replace human drivers they must contend with inclement weather. Falling rain and snow introduce noise in LiDAR returns resulting in both false positive and false negative object detections. In this article we introduce the Winter Adverse Driving dataSet (WADS) collected in the snow belt region of Michigan's Upper Peninsula. WADS is the first multi-modal dataset featuring dense point-wise labeled sequential LiDAR scans collected in severe winter weather; weather that would cause an experienced driver to alter their driving behavior. We have labelled and will make available over 7 GB or 3.6 billion labelled LiDAR points out of over 26 TB of total LiDAR and camera data collected. We also present the Dynamic Statistical Outlier Removal (DSOR) filter, a statistical PCL-based filter capable or removing snow with a higher recall than the state of the art snow de-noising filter while being 28\% faster. Further, the DSOR filter is shown to have a lower time complexity compared to the state of the art resulting in an improved scalability. Our labeled dataset and DSOR filter will be made available at https://bitbucket.org/autonomymtu/dsor_filter △ Less

Submitted 30 October, 2021; v1 submitted 15 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Comments: This work has been submitted to the IEEE for possible publication. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible

Machine learning method for light field refocusing

Authors: Eisa Hedayati, Timothy C. Havens, Jeremy P. Bos

Abstract: Light field imaging introduced the capability to refocus an image after capturing. Currently there are two popular methods for refocusing, shift-and-sum and Fourier slice methods. Neither of these two methods can refocus the light field in real-time without any pre-processing. In this paper we introduce a machine learning based refocusing technique that is capable of extracting 16 refocused images… ▽ More Light field imaging introduced the capability to refocus an image after capturing. Currently there are two popular methods for refocusing, shift-and-sum and Fourier slice methods. Neither of these two methods can refocus the light field in real-time without any pre-processing. In this paper we introduce a machine learning based refocusing technique that is capable of extracting 16 refocused images with refocusing parameters of α=0.125,0.250,0.375,...,2.0 in real-time. We have trained our network, which is called RefNet, in two experiments. Once using the Fourier slice method as the training -- i.e., "ground truth" -- data and another using the shift-and-sum method as the training data. We showed that in both cases, not only is the RefNet method at least 134x faster than previous approaches, but also the color prediction of RefNet is superior to both Fourier slice and shift-and-sum methods while having similar depth of field and focus distance performance. △ Less

Submitted 18 April, 2022; v1 submitted 29 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

The Parallel Meaning Bank: A Framework for Semantically Annotating Multiple Languages

Authors: Lasha Abzianidze, Rik van Noord, Chunliu Wang, Johan Bos

Abstract: This paper gives a general description of the ideas behind the Parallel Meaning Bank, a framework with the aim to provide an easy way to annotate compositional semantics for texts written in languages other than English. The annotation procedure is semi-automatic, and comprises seven layers of linguistic information: segmentation, symbolisation, semantic tagging, word sense disambiguation, syntact… ▽ More This paper gives a general description of the ideas behind the Parallel Meaning Bank, a framework with the aim to provide an easy way to annotate compositional semantics for texts written in languages other than English. The annotation procedure is semi-automatic, and comprises seven layers of linguistic information: segmentation, symbolisation, semantic tagging, word sense disambiguation, syntactic structure, thematic role labelling, and co-reference. New languages can be added to the meaning bank as long as the documents are based on translations from English, but also introduce new interesting challenges on the linguistics assumptions underlying the Parallel Meaning Bank. △ Less

Submitted 29 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: 13 pages, 5 figures, 1 table

MSC Class: 68T50 ACM Class: I.2.7

DRS at MRP 2020: Dressing up Discourse Representation Structures as Graphs

Authors: Lasha Abzianidze, Johan Bos, Stephan Oepen

Abstract: Discourse Representation Theory (DRT) is a formal account for representing the meaning of natural language discourse. Meaning in DRT is modeled via a Discourse Representation Structure (DRS), a meaning representation with a model-theoretic interpretation, which is usually depicted as nested boxes. In contrast, a directed labeled graph is a common data structure used to encode semantics of natural… ▽ More Discourse Representation Theory (DRT) is a formal account for representing the meaning of natural language discourse. Meaning in DRT is modeled via a Discourse Representation Structure (DRS), a meaning representation with a model-theoretic interpretation, which is usually depicted as nested boxes. In contrast, a directed labeled graph is a common data structure used to encode semantics of natural language texts. The paper describes the procedure of dressing up DRSs as directed labeled graphs to include DRT as a new framework in the 2020 shared task on Cross-Framework and Cross-Lingual Meaning Representation Parsing. Since one of the goals of the shared task is to encourage unified models for several semantic graph frameworks, the conversion procedure was biased towards making the DRT graph framework somewhat similar to other graph-based meaning representation frameworks. △ Less

Submitted 29 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: 10 pages, 4 figures, 4 tables, CoNLL 2020 Shared Task

MSC Class: 68T50 ACM Class: I.2.7

Character-level Representations Improve DRS-based Semantic Parsing Even in the Age of BERT

Authors: Rik van Noord, Antonio Toral, Johan Bos

Abstract: We combine character-level and contextual language model representations to improve performance on Discourse Representation Structure parsing. Character representations can easily be added in a sequence-to-sequence model in either one encoder or as a fully separate encoder, with improvements that are robust to different language models, languages and data sets. For English, these improvements are… ▽ More We combine character-level and contextual language model representations to improve performance on Discourse Representation Structure parsing. Character representations can easily be added in a sequence-to-sequence model in either one encoder or as a fully separate encoder, with improvements that are robust to different language models, languages and data sets. For English, these improvements are larger than adding individual sources of linguistic information or adding non-contextual embeddings. A new method of analysis based on semantic tags demonstrates that the character-level representations improve performance across a subset of selected semantic phenomena. △ Less

Submitted 9 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

Comments: EMNLP 2020 (long)

Light Field Compression by Residual CNN Assisted JPEG

Authors: Eisa Hedayati, Timothy C. Havens, Jeremy P. Bos

Abstract: Light field (LF) imaging has gained significant attention due to its recent success in 3-dimensional (3D) displaying and rendering as well as augmented and virtual reality usage. Nonetheless, because of the two extra dimensions, LFs are much larger than conventional images. We develop a JPEG-assisted learning-based technique to reconstruct an LF from a JPEG bitstream with a bit per pixel ratio of… ▽ More Light field (LF) imaging has gained significant attention due to its recent success in 3-dimensional (3D) displaying and rendering as well as augmented and virtual reality usage. Nonetheless, because of the two extra dimensions, LFs are much larger than conventional images. We develop a JPEG-assisted learning-based technique to reconstruct an LF from a JPEG bitstream with a bit per pixel ratio of 0.0047 on average. For compression, we keep the LF's center view and use JPEG compression with 50% quality. Our reconstruction pipeline consists of a small JPEG enhancement network (JPEG-Hance), a depth estimation network (Depth-Net), followed by view synthesizing by warping the enhanced center view. Our pipeline is significantly faster than using video compression on pseudo-sequences extracted from an LF, both in compression and decompression, while maintaining effective performance. We show that with a 1% compression time cost and 18x speedup for decompression, our methods reconstructed LFs have better structural similarity index metric (SSIM) and comparable peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) compared to the state-of-the-art video compression techniques used to compress LFs. △ Less

Submitted 18 March, 2021; v1 submitted 30 September, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Journal ref: 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 2021, pp. 1-9

Thirty Musts for Meaning Banking

Authors: Johan Bos, Lasha Abzianidze

Abstract: Meaning banking--creating a semantically annotated corpus for the purpose of semantic parsing or generation--is a challenging task. It is quite simple to come up with a complex meaning representation, but it is hard to design a simple meaning representation that captures many nuances of meaning. This paper lists some lessons learned in nearly ten years of meaning annotation during the development… ▽ More Meaning banking--creating a semantically annotated corpus for the purpose of semantic parsing or generation--is a challenging task. It is quite simple to come up with a complex meaning representation, but it is hard to design a simple meaning representation that captures many nuances of meaning. This paper lists some lessons learned in nearly ten years of meaning annotation during the development of the Groningen Meaning Bank (Bos et al., 2017) and the Parallel Meaning Bank (Abzianidze et al., 2017). The paper's format is rather unconventional: there is no explicit related work, no methodology section, no results, and no discussion (and the current snippet is not an abstract but actually an introductory preface). Instead, its structure is inspired by work of Traum (2000) and Bender (2013). The list starts with a brief overview of the existing meaning banks (Section 1) and the rest of the items are roughly divided into three groups: corpus collection (Section 2 and 3, annotation methods (Section 4-11), and design of meaning representations (Section 12-30). We hope this overview will give inspiration and guidance in creating improved meaning banks in the future. △ Less

Submitted 27 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Comments: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W19-3302/

Journal ref: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Designing Meaning Representations, 2019, Association for Computational Linguistics

The First Shared Task on Discourse Representation Structure Parsing

Authors: Lasha Abzianidze, Rik van Noord, Hessel Haagsma, Johan Bos

Abstract: The paper presents the IWCS 2019 shared task on semantic parsing where the goal is to produce Discourse Representation Structures (DRSs) for English sentences. DRSs originate from Discourse Representation Theory and represent scoped meaning representations that capture the semantics of negation, modals, quantification, and presupposition triggers. Additionally, concepts and event-participants in D… ▽ More The paper presents the IWCS 2019 shared task on semantic parsing where the goal is to produce Discourse Representation Structures (DRSs) for English sentences. DRSs originate from Discourse Representation Theory and represent scoped meaning representations that capture the semantics of negation, modals, quantification, and presupposition triggers. Additionally, concepts and event-participants in DRSs are described with WordNet synsets and the thematic roles from VerbNet. To measure similarity between two DRSs, they are represented in a clausal form, i.e. as a set of tuples. Participant systems were expected to produce DRSs in this clausal form. Taking into account the rich lexical information, explicit scope marking, a high number of shared variables among clauses, and highly-constrained format of valid DRSs, all these makes the DRS parsing a challenging NLP task. The results of the shared task displayed improvements over the existing state-of-the-art parser. △ Less

Submitted 27 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Comments: International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS)

ACM Class: I.2.7

Journal ref: Proceedings of the IWCS Shared Task on Semantic Parsing, IWCS, SIGSEM, 2019, Association for Computational Linguistics

Drawing Prolog Search Trees: A Manual for Teachers and Students of Logic Programming

Authors: Johan Bos

Abstract: Programming in Prolog is hard for programmers that are used to procedural coding. In this manual the method of drawing search trees is introduced with the aim to get a better understanding of how Prolog works. After giving a first example of a Prolog database, query and search tree, the art of drawing search trees is systematically introduced giving guidelines for queries with variables, conjuncti… ▽ More Programming in Prolog is hard for programmers that are used to procedural coding. In this manual the method of drawing search trees is introduced with the aim to get a better understanding of how Prolog works. After giving a first example of a Prolog database, query and search tree, the art of drawing search trees is systematically introduced giving guidelines for queries with variables, conjunction, disjunction, and negation. Further examples are provided by giving the complete search trees that are shown in Learn Prolog Now! △ Less

Submitted 22 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.

Comments: 20 pages, 8 listings, 7 figures

Casting a Wide Net: Robust Extraction of Potentially Idiomatic Expressions

Authors: Hessel Haagsma, Malvina Nissim, Johan Bos

Abstract: Idiomatic expressions like `out of the woods' and `up the ante' present a range of difficulties for natural language processing applications. We present work on the annotation and extraction of what we term potentially idiomatic expressions (PIEs), a subclass of multiword expressions covering both literal and non-literal uses of idiomatic expressions. Existing corpora of PIEs are small and have li… ▽ More Idiomatic expressions like `out of the woods' and `up the ante' present a range of difficulties for natural language processing applications. We present work on the annotation and extraction of what we term potentially idiomatic expressions (PIEs), a subclass of multiword expressions covering both literal and non-literal uses of idiomatic expressions. Existing corpora of PIEs are small and have limited coverage of different PIE types, which hampers research. To further progress on the extraction and disambiguation of potentially idiomatic expressions, larger corpora of PIEs are required. In addition, larger corpora are a potential source for valuable linguistic insights into idiomatic expressions and their variability. We propose automatic tools to facilitate the building of larger PIE corpora, by investigating the feasibility of using dictionary-based extraction of PIEs as a pre-extraction tool for English. We do this by assessing the reliability and coverage of idiom dictionaries, the annotation of a PIE corpus, and the automatic extraction of PIEs from a large corpus. Results show that combinations of dictionaries are a reliable source of idiomatic expressions, that PIEs can be annotated with a high reliability (0.74-0.91 Fleiss' Kappa), and that parse-based PIE extraction yields highly accurate performance (88% F1-score). Combining complementary PIE extraction methods increases reliability further, to over 92% F1-score. Moreover, the extraction method presented here could be extended to other types of multiword expressions and to other languages, given that sufficient NLP tools are available. △ Less

Submitted 20 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Separating Argument Structure from Logical Structure in AMR

Authors: Johan Bos

Abstract: The AMR (Abstract Meaning Representation) formalism for representing meaning of natural language sentences was not designed to deal with scope and quantifiers. By extending AMR with indices for contexts and formulating constraints on these contexts, a formalism is derived that makes correct prediction for inferences involving negation and bound variables. The attractive core predicate-argument str… ▽ More The AMR (Abstract Meaning Representation) formalism for representing meaning of natural language sentences was not designed to deal with scope and quantifiers. By extending AMR with indices for contexts and formulating constraints on these contexts, a formalism is derived that makes correct prediction for inferences involving negation and bound variables. The attractive core predicate-argument structure of AMR is preserved. The resulting framework is similar to that of Discourse Representation Theory. △ Less

Submitted 27 October, 2020; v1 submitted 4 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.

Can neural networks understand monotonicity reasoning?

Authors: Hitomi Yanaka, Koji Mineshima, Daisuke Bekki, Kentaro Inui, Satoshi Sekine, Lasha Abzianidze, Johan Bos

Abstract: Monotonicity reasoning is one of the important reasoning skills for any intelligent natural language inference (NLI) model in that it requires the ability to capture the interaction between lexical and syntactic structures. Since no test set has been developed for monotonicity reasoning with wide coverage, it is still unclear whether neural models can perform monotonicity reasoning in a proper way… ▽ More Monotonicity reasoning is one of the important reasoning skills for any intelligent natural language inference (NLI) model in that it requires the ability to capture the interaction between lexical and syntactic structures. Since no test set has been developed for monotonicity reasoning with wide coverage, it is still unclear whether neural models can perform monotonicity reasoning in a proper way. To investigate this issue, we introduce the Monotonicity Entailment Dataset (MED). Performance by state-of-the-art NLI models on the new test set is substantially worse, under 55%, especially on downward reasoning. In addition, analysis using a monotonicity-driven data augmentation method showed that these models might be limited in their generalization ability in upward and downward reasoning. △ Less

Submitted 27 June, 2019; v1 submitted 14 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

Comments: accepted by ACL2019 BlackboxNLP (long paper)

HELP: A Dataset for Identifying Shortcomings of Neural Models in Monotonicity Reasoning

Authors: Hitomi Yanaka, Koji Mineshima, Daisuke Bekki, Kentaro Inui, Satoshi Sekine, Lasha Abzianidze, Johan Bos

Abstract: Large crowdsourced datasets are widely used for training and evaluating neural models on natural language inference (NLI). Despite these efforts, neural models have a hard time capturing logical inferences, including those licensed by phrase replacements, so-called monotonicity reasoning. Since no large dataset has been developed for monotonicity reasoning, it is still unclear whether the main obs… ▽ More Large crowdsourced datasets are widely used for training and evaluating neural models on natural language inference (NLI). Despite these efforts, neural models have a hard time capturing logical inferences, including those licensed by phrase replacements, so-called monotonicity reasoning. Since no large dataset has been developed for monotonicity reasoning, it is still unclear whether the main obstacle is the size of datasets or the model architectures themselves. To investigate this issue, we introduce a new dataset, called HELP, for handling entailments with lexical and logical phenomena. We add it to training data for the state-of-the-art neural models and evaluate them on test sets for monotonicity phenomena. The results showed that our data augmentation improved the overall accuracy. We also find that the improvement is better on monotonicity inferences with lexical replacements than on downward inferences with disjunction and modification. This suggests that some types of inferences can be improved by our data augmentation while others are immune to it. △ Less

Submitted 27 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Comments: 6 pages, 1 figure, accepted as *SEM 2019

An Atomistic Machine Learning Package for Surface Science and Catalysis

Authors: Martin Hangaard Hansen, José A. Garrido Torres, Paul C. Jennings, Ziyun Wang, Jacob R. Boes, Osman G. Mamun, Thomas Bligaard

Abstract: We present work flows and a software module for machine learning model building in surface science and heterogeneous catalysis. This includes fingerprinting atomic structures from 3D structure and/or connectivity information, it includes descriptor selection methods and benchmarks, and it includes active learning frameworks for atomic structure optimization, acceleration of screening studies and f… ▽ More We present work flows and a software module for machine learning model building in surface science and heterogeneous catalysis. This includes fingerprinting atomic structures from 3D structure and/or connectivity information, it includes descriptor selection methods and benchmarks, and it includes active learning frameworks for atomic structure optimization, acceleration of screening studies and for exploration of the structure space of nano particles, which are all atomic structure problems relevant for surface science and heterogeneous catalysis. Our overall goal is to provide a repository to ease machine learning model building for catalysis, to advance the models beyond the chemical intuition of the user and to increase autonomy for exploration of chemical space. △ Less

Submitted 1 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Exploring Neural Methods for Parsing Discourse Representation Structures

Authors: Rik van Noord, Lasha Abzianidze, Antonio Toral, Johan Bos

Abstract: Neural methods have had several recent successes in semantic parsing, though they have yet to face the challenge of producing meaning representations based on formal semantics. We present a sequence-to-sequence neural semantic parser that is able to produce Discourse Representation Structures (DRSs) for English sentences with high accuracy, outperforming traditional DRS parsers. To facilitate the… ▽ More Neural methods have had several recent successes in semantic parsing, though they have yet to face the challenge of producing meaning representations based on formal semantics. We present a sequence-to-sequence neural semantic parser that is able to produce Discourse Representation Structures (DRSs) for English sentences with high accuracy, outperforming traditional DRS parsers. To facilitate the learning of the output, we represent DRSs as a sequence of flat clauses and introduce a method to verify that produced DRSs are well-formed and interpretable. We compare models using characters and words as input and see (somewhat surprisingly) that the former performs better than the latter. We show that eliminating variable names from the output using De Bruijn-indices increases parser performance. Adding silver training data boosts performance even further. △ Less

Submitted 30 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

Comments: to appear in TACL 2018

What can we learn from Semantic Tagging?

Authors: Mostafa Abdou, Artur Kulmizev, Vinit Ravishankar, Lasha Abzianidze, Johan Bos

Abstract: We investigate the effects of multi-task learning using the recently introduced task of semantic tagging. We employ semantic tagging as an auxiliary task for three different NLP tasks: part-of-speech tagging, Universal Dependency parsing, and Natural Language Inference. We compare full neural network sharing, partial neural network sharing, and what we term the learning what to share setting where… ▽ More We investigate the effects of multi-task learning using the recently introduced task of semantic tagging. We employ semantic tagging as an auxiliary task for three different NLP tasks: part-of-speech tagging, Universal Dependency parsing, and Natural Language Inference. We compare full neural network sharing, partial neural network sharing, and what we term the learning what to share setting where negative transfer between tasks is less likely. Our findings show considerable improvements for all tasks, particularly in the learning what to share setting, which shows consistent gains across all tasks. △ Less

Submitted 29 August, 2018; originally announced August 2018.

Comments: 9 pages with references and appendixes. EMNLP 2018 camera ready

Evaluating Scoped Meaning Representations

Authors: Rik van Noord, Lasha Abzianidze, Hessel Haagsma, Johan Bos

Abstract: Semantic parsing offers many opportunities to improve natural language understanding. We present a semantically annotated parallel corpus for English, German, Italian, and Dutch where sentences are aligned with scoped meaning representations in order to capture the semantics of negation, modals, quantification, and presupposition triggers. The semantic formalism is based on Discourse Representatio… ▽ More Semantic parsing offers many opportunities to improve natural language understanding. We present a semantically annotated parallel corpus for English, German, Italian, and Dutch where sentences are aligned with scoped meaning representations in order to capture the semantics of negation, modals, quantification, and presupposition triggers. The semantic formalism is based on Discourse Representation Theory, but concepts are represented by WordNet synsets and thematic roles by VerbNet relations. Translating scoped meaning representations to sets of clauses enables us to compare them for the purpose of semantic parser evaluation and checking translations. This is done by computing precision and recall on matching clauses, in a similar way as is done for Abstract Meaning Representations. We show that our matching tool for evaluating scoped meaning representations is both accurate and efficient. Applying this matching tool to three baseline semantic parsers yields F-scores between 43% and 54%. A pilot study is performed to automatically find changes in meaning by comparing meaning representations of translations. This comparison turns out to be an additional way of (i) finding annotation mistakes and (ii) finding instances where our semantic analysis needs to be improved. △ Less

Submitted 10 April, 2018; v1 submitted 23 February, 2018; originally announced February 2018.

Comments: Camera-ready for LREC 2018

Towards Universal Semantic Tagging

Authors: Lasha Abzianidze, Johan Bos

Abstract: The paper proposes the task of universal semantic tagging---tagging word tokens with language-neutral, semantically informative tags. We argue that the task, with its independent nature, contributes to better semantic analysis for wide-coverage multilingual text. We present the initial version of the semantic tagset and show that (a) the tags provide semantically fine-grained information, and (b)… ▽ More The paper proposes the task of universal semantic tagging---tagging word tokens with language-neutral, semantically informative tags. We argue that the task, with its independent nature, contributes to better semantic analysis for wide-coverage multilingual text. We present the initial version of the semantic tagset and show that (a) the tags provide semantically fine-grained information, and (b) they are suitable for cross-lingual semantic parsing. An application of the semantic tagging in the Parallel Meaning Bank supports both of these points as the tags contribute to formal lexical semantics and their cross-lingual projection. As a part of the application, we annotate a small corpus with the semantic tags and present new baseline result for universal semantic tagging. △ Less

Submitted 29 September, 2017; originally announced September 2017.

Comments: 9 pages, International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS)

Neural Semantic Parsing by Character-based Translation: Experiments with Abstract Meaning Representations

Authors: Rik van Noord, Johan Bos

Abstract: We evaluate the character-level translation method for neural semantic parsing on a large corpus of sentences annotated with Abstract Meaning Representations (AMRs). Using a sequence-to-sequence model, and some trivial preprocessing and postprocessing of AMRs, we obtain a baseline accuracy of 53.1 (F-score on AMR-triples). We examine five different approaches to improve this baseline result: (i) r… ▽ More We evaluate the character-level translation method for neural semantic parsing on a large corpus of sentences annotated with Abstract Meaning Representations (AMRs). Using a sequence-to-sequence model, and some trivial preprocessing and postprocessing of AMRs, we obtain a baseline accuracy of 53.1 (F-score on AMR-triples). We examine five different approaches to improve this baseline result: (i) reordering AMR branches to match the word order of the input sentence increases performance to 58.3; (ii) adding part-of-speech tags (automatically produced) to the input shows improvement as well (57.2); (iii) So does the introduction of super characters (conflating frequent sequences of characters to a single character), reaching 57.4; (iv) optimizing the training process by using pre-training and averaging a set of models increases performance to 58.7; (v) adding silver-standard training data obtained by an off-the-shelf parser yields the biggest improvement, resulting in an F-score of 64.0. Combining all five techniques leads to an F-score of 71.0 on holdout data, which is state-of-the-art in AMR parsing. This is remarkable because of the relative simplicity of the approach. △ Less

Submitted 9 October, 2017; v1 submitted 28 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.

Comments: Camera ready for CLIN 2017 journal

The Meaning Factory at SemEval-2017 Task 9: Producing AMRs with Neural Semantic Parsing

Authors: Rik van Noord, Johan Bos

Abstract: We evaluate a semantic parser based on a character-based sequence-to-sequence model in the context of the SemEval-2017 shared task on semantic parsing for AMRs. With data augmentation, super characters, and POS-tagging we gain major improvements in performance compared to a baseline character-level model. Although we improve on previous character-based neural semantic parsing models, the overall a… ▽ More We evaluate a semantic parser based on a character-based sequence-to-sequence model in the context of the SemEval-2017 shared task on semantic parsing for AMRs. With data augmentation, super characters, and POS-tagging we gain major improvements in performance compared to a baseline character-level model. Although we improve on previous character-based neural semantic parsing models, the overall accuracy is still lower than a state-of-the-art AMR parser. An ensemble combining our neural semantic parser with an existing, traditional parser, yields a small gain in performance. △ Less

Submitted 19 April, 2017; v1 submitted 7 April, 2017; originally announced April 2017.

Comments: To appear in Proceedings of SemEval, 2017 (camera-ready)

The Parallel Meaning Bank: Towards a Multilingual Corpus of Translations Annotated with Compositional Meaning Representations

Authors: Lasha Abzianidze, Johannes Bjerva, Kilian Evang, Hessel Haagsma, Rik van Noord, Pierre Ludmann, Duc-Duy Nguyen, Johan Bos

Abstract: The Parallel Meaning Bank is a corpus of translations annotated with shared, formal meaning representations comprising over 11 million words divided over four languages (English, German, Italian, and Dutch). Our approach is based on cross-lingual projection: automatically produced (and manually corrected) semantic annotations for English sentences are mapped onto their word-aligned translations, a… ▽ More The Parallel Meaning Bank is a corpus of translations annotated with shared, formal meaning representations comprising over 11 million words divided over four languages (English, German, Italian, and Dutch). Our approach is based on cross-lingual projection: automatically produced (and manually corrected) semantic annotations for English sentences are mapped onto their word-aligned translations, assuming that the translations are meaning-preserving. The semantic annotation consists of five main steps: (i) segmentation of the text in sentences and lexical items; (ii) syntactic parsing with Combinatory Categorial Grammar; (iii) universal semantic tagging; (iv) symbolization; and (v) compositional semantic analysis based on Discourse Representation Theory. These steps are performed using statistical models trained in a semi-supervised manner. The employed annotation models are all language-neutral. Our first results are promising. △ Less

Submitted 13 February, 2017; originally announced February 2017.

Comments: To appear at EACL 2017

Semantic Tagging with Deep Residual Networks

Authors: Johannes Bjerva, Barbara Plank, Johan Bos

Abstract: We propose a novel semantic tagging task, sem-tagging, tailored for the purpose of multilingual semantic parsing, and present the first tagger using deep residual networks (ResNets). Our tagger uses both word and character representations and includes a novel residual bypass architecture. We evaluate the tagset both intrinsically on the new task of semantic tagging, as well as on Part-of-Speech (P… ▽ More We propose a novel semantic tagging task, sem-tagging, tailored for the purpose of multilingual semantic parsing, and present the first tagger using deep residual networks (ResNets). Our tagger uses both word and character representations and includes a novel residual bypass architecture. We evaluate the tagset both intrinsically on the new task of semantic tagging, as well as on Part-of-Speech (POS) tagging. Our system, consisting of a ResNet and an auxiliary loss function predicting our semantic tags, significantly outperforms prior results on English Universal Dependencies POS tagging (95.71% accuracy on UD v1.2 and 95.67% accuracy on UD v1.3). △ Less

Submitted 31 October, 2016; v1 submitted 22 September, 2016; originally announced September 2016.

Comments: COLING 2016, camera ready version

Finding ECM-friendly curves through a study of Galois properties

Authors: Razvan Barbulescu, Joppe W. Bos, Cyril Bouvier, Thorsten Kleinjung, Peter L. Montgomery

Abstract: In this paper we prove some divisibility properties of the cardinality of elliptic curves modulo primes. These proofs explain the good behavior of certain parameters when using Montgomery or Edwards curves in the setting of the elliptic curve method (ECM) for integer factorization. The ideas of the proofs help us to find new families of elliptic curves with good division properties which increase… ▽ More In this paper we prove some divisibility properties of the cardinality of elliptic curves modulo primes. These proofs explain the good behavior of certain parameters when using Montgomery or Edwards curves in the setting of the elliptic curve method (ECM) for integer factorization. The ideas of the proofs help us to find new families of elliptic curves with good division properties which increase the success probability of ECM. △ Less

Submitted 4 September, 2012; v1 submitted 20 February, 2012; originally announced February 2012.

Journal ref: Algorithmic Number Theory Symposium (2012)

Rascal: From Algebraic Specification to Meta-Programming

Authors: Jeroen van den Bos, Mark Hills, Paul Klint, Tijs van der Storm, Jurgen J. Vinju

Abstract: Algebraic specification has a long tradition in bridging the gap between specification and programming by making specifications executable. Building on extensive experience in designing, implementing and using specification formalisms that are based on algebraic specification and term rewriting (namely Asf and Asf+Sdf), we are now focusing on using the best concepts from algebraic specification an… ▽ More Algebraic specification has a long tradition in bridging the gap between specification and programming by making specifications executable. Building on extensive experience in designing, implementing and using specification formalisms that are based on algebraic specification and term rewriting (namely Asf and Asf+Sdf), we are now focusing on using the best concepts from algebraic specification and integrating these into a new programming language: Rascal. This language is easy to learn by non-experts but is also scalable to very large meta-programming applications. We explain the algebraic roots of Rascal and its main application areas: software analysis, software transformation, and design and implementation of domain-specific languages. Some example applications in the domain of Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) are described to illustrate this. △ Less

Submitted 30 June, 2011; originally announced July 2011.

Comments: In Proceedings AMMSE 2011, arXiv:1106.5962

ACM Class: D.3.2

Journal ref: EPTCS 56, 2011, pp. 15-32

Compositional Semantics in Verbmobil

Authors: Johan Bos, Björn Gambäck, Christian Lieske, Yoshiki Mori, Manfred Pinkal, Karsten Worm

Abstract: The paper discusses how compositional semantics is implemented in the Verbmobil speech-to-speech translation system using LUD, a description language for underspecified discourse representation structures. The description language and its formal interpretation in DRT are described as well as its implementation together with the architecture of the system's entire syntactic-semantic processing mo… ▽ More The paper discusses how compositional semantics is implemented in the Verbmobil speech-to-speech translation system using LUD, a description language for underspecified discourse representation structures. The description language and its formal interpretation in DRT are described as well as its implementation together with the architecture of the system's entire syntactic-semantic processing module. We show that a linguistically sound theory and formalism can be properly implemented in a system with (near) real-time requirements. △ Less

Submitted 30 July, 1996; originally announced July 1996.

Comments: 6 pages, LaTeX, uses colap.sty

Journal ref: Proceedings of COLING '96

Bridging as Coercive Accommodation

Authors: Johan Bos, Paul Buitelaar, Anne-Marie Mineur

Abstract: In this paper we discuss the notion of "bridging" in Discourse Representation Theory as a tool to account for discourse referents that have only been established implicitly, through the lexical semantics of other referents. In doing so, we use ideas from Generative Lexicon theory, to introduce antecedents for anaphoric expressions that cannot be "linked" to a proper antecedent, but that do not n… ▽ More In this paper we discuss the notion of "bridging" in Discourse Representation Theory as a tool to account for discourse referents that have only been established implicitly, through the lexical semantics of other referents. In doing so, we use ideas from Generative Lexicon theory, to introduce antecedents for anaphoric expressions that cannot be "linked" to a proper antecedent, but that do not need to be "accommodated" because they have some connection to the network of discourse referents that is already established. △ Less

Submitted 2 August, 1995; originally announced August 1995.

Comments: LaTeX file, 16 pages, uses named.sty. Paper presented at CLNLP workshop, Edinburgh, April 3-5, 1995

Report number: CLAUS 52 Technical Report