-
Verificarlo CI: continuous integration for numerical optimization and debugging
Authors:
Aurélien Delval,
François Coppens,
Eric Petit,
Roman Iakymchuk,
Pablo de Oliveira Castro
Abstract:
Floating-point accuracy is an important concern when developing numerical simulations or other compute-intensive codes. Tracking the introduction of numerical regression is often delayed until it provokes unexpected bug for the end-user. In this paper, we introduce Verificarlo CI, a continuous integration workflow for the numerical optimization and debugging of a code over the course of its devel…
▽ More
Floating-point accuracy is an important concern when developing numerical simulations or other compute-intensive codes. Tracking the introduction of numerical regression is often delayed until it provokes unexpected bug for the end-user. In this paper, we introduce Verificarlo CI, a continuous integration workflow for the numerical optimization and debugging of a code over the course of its development. We demonstrate applicability of Verificarlo CI on two test-case applications.
△ Less
Submitted 11 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Workflows Community Summit 2022: A Roadmap Revolution
Authors:
Rafael Ferreira da Silva,
Rosa M. Badia,
Venkat Bala,
Debbie Bard,
Peer-Timo Bremer,
Ian Buckley,
Silvina Caino-Lores,
Kyle Chard,
Carole Goble,
Shantenu Jha,
Daniel S. Katz,
Daniel Laney,
Manish Parashar,
Frederic Suter,
Nick Tyler,
Thomas Uram,
Ilkay Altintas,
Stefan Andersson,
William Arndt,
Juan Aznar,
Jonathan Bader,
Bartosz Balis,
Chris Blanton,
Kelly Rosa Braghetto,
Aharon Brodutch
, et al. (80 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Scientific workflows have become integral tools in broad scientific computing use cases. Science discovery is increasingly dependent on workflows to orchestrate large and complex scientific experiments that range from execution of a cloud-based data preprocessing pipeline to multi-facility instrument-to-edge-to-HPC computational workflows. Given the changing landscape of scientific computing and t…
▽ More
Scientific workflows have become integral tools in broad scientific computing use cases. Science discovery is increasingly dependent on workflows to orchestrate large and complex scientific experiments that range from execution of a cloud-based data preprocessing pipeline to multi-facility instrument-to-edge-to-HPC computational workflows. Given the changing landscape of scientific computing and the evolving needs of emerging scientific applications, it is paramount that the development of novel scientific workflows and system functionalities seek to increase the efficiency, resilience, and pervasiveness of existing systems and applications. Specifically, the proliferation of machine learning/artificial intelligence (ML/AI) workflows, need for processing large scale datasets produced by instruments at the edge, intensification of near real-time data processing, support for long-term experiment campaigns, and emergence of quantum computing as an adjunct to HPC, have significantly changed the functional and operational requirements of workflow systems. Workflow systems now need to, for example, support data streams from the edge-to-cloud-to-HPC enable the management of many small-sized files, allow data reduction while ensuring high accuracy, orchestrate distributed services (workflows, instruments, data movement, provenance, publication, etc.) across computing and user facilities, among others. Further, to accelerate science, it is also necessary that these systems implement specifications/standards and APIs for seamless (horizontal and vertical) integration between systems and applications, as well as enabling the publication of workflows and their associated products according to the FAIR principles. This document reports on discussions and findings from the 2022 international edition of the Workflows Community Summit that took place on November 29 and 30, 2022.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
A Community Roadmap for Scientific Workflows Research and Development
Authors:
Rafael Ferreira da Silva,
Henri Casanova,
Kyle Chard,
Ilkay Altintas,
Rosa M Badia,
Bartosz Balis,
Tainã Coleman,
Frederik Coppens,
Frank Di Natale,
Bjoern Enders,
Thomas Fahringer,
Rosa Filgueira,
Grigori Fursin,
Daniel Garijo,
Carole Goble,
Dorran Howell,
Shantenu Jha,
Daniel S. Katz,
Daniel Laney,
Ulf Leser,
Maciej Malawski,
Kshitij Mehta,
Loïc Pottier,
Jonathan Ozik,
J. Luc Peterson
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The landscape of workflow systems for scientific applications is notoriously convoluted with hundreds of seemingly equivalent workflow systems, many isolated research claims, and a steep learning curve. To address some of these challenges and lay the groundwork for transforming workflows research and development, the WorkflowsRI and ExaWorks projects partnered to bring the international workflows…
▽ More
The landscape of workflow systems for scientific applications is notoriously convoluted with hundreds of seemingly equivalent workflow systems, many isolated research claims, and a steep learning curve. To address some of these challenges and lay the groundwork for transforming workflows research and development, the WorkflowsRI and ExaWorks projects partnered to bring the international workflows community together. This paper reports on discussions and findings from two virtual "Workflows Community Summits" (January and April, 2021). The overarching goals of these workshops were to develop a view of the state of the art, identify crucial research challenges in the workflows community, articulate a vision for potential community efforts, and discuss technical approaches for realizing this vision. To this end, participants identified six broad themes: FAIR computational workflows; AI workflows; exascale challenges; APIs, interoperability, reuse, and standards; training and education; and building a workflows community. We summarize discussions and recommendations for each of these themes.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2021; v1 submitted 5 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Packaging research artefacts with RO-Crate
Authors:
Stian Soiland-Reyes,
Peter Sefton,
Mercè Crosas,
Leyla Jael Castro,
Frederik Coppens,
José M. Fernández,
Daniel Garijo,
Björn Grüning,
Marco La Rosa,
Simone Leo,
Eoghan Ó Carragáin,
Marc Portier,
Ana Trisovic,
RO-Crate Community,
Paul Groth,
Carole Goble
Abstract:
An increasing number of researchers support reproducibility by including pointers to and descriptions of datasets, software and methods in their publications. However, scientific articles may be ambiguous, incomplete and difficult to process by automated systems. In this paper we introduce RO-Crate, an open, community-driven, and lightweight approach to packaging research artefacts along with thei…
▽ More
An increasing number of researchers support reproducibility by including pointers to and descriptions of datasets, software and methods in their publications. However, scientific articles may be ambiguous, incomplete and difficult to process by automated systems. In this paper we introduce RO-Crate, an open, community-driven, and lightweight approach to packaging research artefacts along with their metadata in a machine readable manner. RO-Crate is based on Schema$.$org annotations in JSON-LD, aiming to establish best practices to formally describe metadata in an accessible and practical way for their use in a wide variety of situations.
An RO-Crate is a structured archive of all the items that contributed to a research outcome, including their identifiers, provenance, relations and annotations. As a general purpose packaging approach for data and their metadata, RO-Crate is used across multiple areas, including bioinformatics, digital humanities and regulatory sciences. By applying "just enough" Linked Data standards, RO-Crate simplifies the process of making research outputs FAIR while also enhancing research reproducibility.
An RO-Crate for this article is available at https://w3id.org/ro/doi/10.5281/zenodo.5146227
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2021; v1 submitted 14 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Workflows Community Summit: Advancing the State-of-the-art of Scientific Workflows Management Systems Research and Development
Authors:
Rafael Ferreira da Silva,
Henri Casanova,
Kyle Chard,
Tainã Coleman,
Dan Laney,
Dong Ahn,
Shantenu Jha,
Dorran Howell,
Stian Soiland-Reys,
Ilkay Altintas,
Douglas Thain,
Rosa Filgueira,
Yadu Babuji,
Rosa M. Badia,
Bartosz Balis,
Silvina Caino-Lores,
Scott Callaghan,
Frederik Coppens,
Michael R. Crusoe,
Kaushik De,
Frank Di Natale,
Tu M. A. Do,
Bjoern Enders,
Thomas Fahringer,
Anne Fouilloux
, et al. (33 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Scientific workflows are a cornerstone of modern scientific computing, and they have underpinned some of the most significant discoveries of the last decade. Many of these workflows have high computational, storage, and/or communication demands, and thus must execute on a wide range of large-scale platforms, from large clouds to upcoming exascale HPC platforms. Workflows will play a crucial role i…
▽ More
Scientific workflows are a cornerstone of modern scientific computing, and they have underpinned some of the most significant discoveries of the last decade. Many of these workflows have high computational, storage, and/or communication demands, and thus must execute on a wide range of large-scale platforms, from large clouds to upcoming exascale HPC platforms. Workflows will play a crucial role in the data-oriented and post-Moore's computing landscape as they democratize the application of cutting-edge research techniques, computationally intensive methods, and use of new computing platforms. As workflows continue to be adopted by scientific projects and user communities, they are becoming more complex. Workflows are increasingly composed of tasks that perform computations such as short machine learning inference, multi-node simulations, long-running machine learning model training, amongst others, and thus increasingly rely on heterogeneous architectures that include CPUs but also GPUs and accelerators. The workflow management system (WMS) technology landscape is currently segmented and presents significant barriers to entry due to the hundreds of seemingly comparable, yet incompatible, systems that exist. Another fundamental problem is that there are conflicting theoretical bases and abstractions for a WMS. Systems that use the same underlying abstractions can likely be translated between, which is not the case for systems that use different abstractions. More information: https://workflowsri.org/summits/technical
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
