-
Streaming Large-Scale Electron Microscopy Data to a Supercomputing Facility
Authors:
Samuel S. Welborn,
Chris Harris,
Stephanie M. Ribet,
Georgios Varnavides,
Colin Ophus,
Bjoern Enders,
Peter Ercius
Abstract:
Data management is a critical component of modern experimental workflows. As data generation rates increase, transferring data from acquisition servers to processing servers via conventional file-based methods is becoming increasingly impractical. The 4D Camera at the National Center for Electron Microscopy (NCEM) generates data at a nominal rate of 480 Gbit/s (87,000 frames/s) producing a 700 GB…
▽ More
Data management is a critical component of modern experimental workflows. As data generation rates increase, transferring data from acquisition servers to processing servers via conventional file-based methods is becoming increasingly impractical. The 4D Camera at the National Center for Electron Microscopy (NCEM) generates data at a nominal rate of 480 Gbit/s (87,000 frames/s) producing a 700 GB dataset in fifteen seconds. To address the challenges associated with storing and processing such quantities of data, we developed a streaming workflow that utilizes a high-speed network to connect the 4D Camera's data acquisition (DAQ) system to supercomputing nodes at the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), bypassing intermediate file storage entirely. In this work, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our streaming pipeline in a production setting through an hour-long experiment that generated over 10 TB of raw data, yielding high-quality datasets suitable for advanced analyses. Additionally, we compare the efficacy of this streaming workflow against the conventional file-transfer workflow by conducting a post-mortem analysis on historical data from experiments performed by real users. Our findings show that the streaming workflow significantly improves data turnaround time, enables real-time decision-making, and minimizes the potential for human error by eliminating manual user interactions.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Accelerating Time-to-Science by Streaming Detector Data Directly into Perlmutter Compute Nodes
Authors:
Samuel S. Welborn,
Bjoern Enders,
Chris Harris,
Peter Ercius,
Deborah J. Bard
Abstract:
Recent advancements in detector technology have significantly increased the size and complexity of experimental data, and high-performance computing (HPC) provides a path towards more efficient and timely data processing. However, movement of large data sets from acquisition systems to HPC centers introduces bottlenecks owing to storage I/O at both ends. This manuscript introduces a streaming work…
▽ More
Recent advancements in detector technology have significantly increased the size and complexity of experimental data, and high-performance computing (HPC) provides a path towards more efficient and timely data processing. However, movement of large data sets from acquisition systems to HPC centers introduces bottlenecks owing to storage I/O at both ends. This manuscript introduces a streaming workflow designed for an high data rate electron detector that streams data directly to compute node memory at the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), thereby avoiding storage I/O. The new workflow deploys ZeroMQ-based services for data production, aggregation, and distribution for on-the-fly processing, all coordinated through a distributed key-value store. The system is integrated with the detector's science gateway and utilizes the NERSC Superfacility API to initiate streaming jobs through a web-based frontend. Our approach achieves up to a 14-fold increase in data throughput and enhances predictability and reliability compared to a I/O-heavy file-based transfer workflow. Our work highlights the transformative potential of streaming workflows to expedite data analysis for time-sensitive experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 2 July, 2024; v1 submitted 21 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Interactive and Urgent HPC: Challenges and Opportunities
Authors:
Albert Reuther,
Nick Brown,
William Arndt,
Johannes Blaschke,
Christian Boehme,
Antony Chazapis,
Bjoern Enders,
Robert Henschel,
Julian Kunkel,
Maxime Martinasso
Abstract:
As a broader set of applications from simulations to data analysis and machine learning require more parallel computational capability, the demand for interactive and urgent high performance computing (HPC) continues to increase. This paper overviews the progress made so far and elucidates the challenges and opportunities for greater integration of interactive and urgent HPC policies, techniques,…
▽ More
As a broader set of applications from simulations to data analysis and machine learning require more parallel computational capability, the demand for interactive and urgent high performance computing (HPC) continues to increase. This paper overviews the progress made so far and elucidates the challenges and opportunities for greater integration of interactive and urgent HPC policies, techniques, and technologies into HPC ecosystems.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Workflows Community Summit 2022: A Roadmap Revolution
Authors:
Rafael Ferreira da Silva,
Rosa M. Badia,
Venkat Bala,
Debbie Bard,
Peer-Timo Bremer,
Ian Buckley,
Silvina Caino-Lores,
Kyle Chard,
Carole Goble,
Shantenu Jha,
Daniel S. Katz,
Daniel Laney,
Manish Parashar,
Frederic Suter,
Nick Tyler,
Thomas Uram,
Ilkay Altintas,
Stefan Andersson,
William Arndt,
Juan Aznar,
Jonathan Bader,
Bartosz Balis,
Chris Blanton,
Kelly Rosa Braghetto,
Aharon Brodutch
, et al. (80 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Scientific workflows have become integral tools in broad scientific computing use cases. Science discovery is increasingly dependent on workflows to orchestrate large and complex scientific experiments that range from execution of a cloud-based data preprocessing pipeline to multi-facility instrument-to-edge-to-HPC computational workflows. Given the changing landscape of scientific computing and t…
▽ More
Scientific workflows have become integral tools in broad scientific computing use cases. Science discovery is increasingly dependent on workflows to orchestrate large and complex scientific experiments that range from execution of a cloud-based data preprocessing pipeline to multi-facility instrument-to-edge-to-HPC computational workflows. Given the changing landscape of scientific computing and the evolving needs of emerging scientific applications, it is paramount that the development of novel scientific workflows and system functionalities seek to increase the efficiency, resilience, and pervasiveness of existing systems and applications. Specifically, the proliferation of machine learning/artificial intelligence (ML/AI) workflows, need for processing large scale datasets produced by instruments at the edge, intensification of near real-time data processing, support for long-term experiment campaigns, and emergence of quantum computing as an adjunct to HPC, have significantly changed the functional and operational requirements of workflow systems. Workflow systems now need to, for example, support data streams from the edge-to-cloud-to-HPC enable the management of many small-sized files, allow data reduction while ensuring high accuracy, orchestrate distributed services (workflows, instruments, data movement, provenance, publication, etc.) across computing and user facilities, among others. Further, to accelerate science, it is also necessary that these systems implement specifications/standards and APIs for seamless (horizontal and vertical) integration between systems and applications, as well as enabling the publication of workflows and their associated products according to the FAIR principles. This document reports on discussions and findings from the 2022 international edition of the Workflows Community Summit that took place on November 29 and 30, 2022.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
The LBNL Superfacility Project Report
Authors:
Deborah Bard,
Cory Snavely,
Lisa Gerhardt,
Jason Lee,
Becci Totzke,
Katie Antypas,
William Arndt,
Johannes Blaschke,
Suren Byna,
Ravi Cheema,
Shreyas Cholia,
Mark Day,
Bjoern Enders,
Aditi Gaur,
Annette Greiner,
Taylor Groves,
Mariam Kiran,
Quincey Koziol,
Tom Lehman,
Kelly Rowland,
Chris Samuel,
Ashwin Selvarajan,
Alex Sim,
David Skinner,
Laurie Stephey
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Superfacility model is designed to leverage HPC for experimental science. It is more than simply a model of connected experiment, network, and HPC facilities; it encompasses the full ecosystem of infrastructure, software, tools, and expertise needed to make connected facilities easy to use. The three-year Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) Superfacility project was initiated in 2019…
▽ More
The Superfacility model is designed to leverage HPC for experimental science. It is more than simply a model of connected experiment, network, and HPC facilities; it encompasses the full ecosystem of infrastructure, software, tools, and expertise needed to make connected facilities easy to use. The three-year Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) Superfacility project was initiated in 2019 to coordinate work being performed at LBNL to support this model, and to provide a coherent and comprehensive set of science requirements to drive existing and new work.
A key component of the project was the in-depth engagements with eight science teams that represent challenging use cases across the DOE Office of Science. By the close of the project, we met our project goal by enabling our science application engagements to demonstrate automated pipelines that analyze data from remote facilities at large scale, without routine human intervention. In several cases, we have gone beyond demonstrations and now provide production-level services. To achieve this goal, the Superfacility team developed tools, infrastructure, and policies for near-real-time computing support, dynamic high-performance networking, data management and movement tools, API-driven automation, HPC-scale notebooks via Jupyter, authentication using Federated Identity and container-based edge services supported.
The lessons we learned during this project provide a valuable model for future large, complex, cross-disciplinary collaborations. There is a pressing need for a coherent computing infrastructure across national facilities, and LBNL's Superfacility project is a unique model for success in tackling the challenges that will be faced in hardware, software, policies, and services across multiple science domains.
△ Less
Submitted 27 June, 2022; v1 submitted 23 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Workflows Community Summit: Tightening the Integration between Computing Facilities and Scientific Workflows
Authors:
Rafael Ferreira da Silva,
Kyle Chard,
Henri Casanova,
Dan Laney,
Dong Ahn,
Shantenu Jha,
William E. Allcock,
Gregory Bauer,
Dmitry Duplyakin,
Bjoern Enders,
Todd M. Heer,
Eric Lancon,
Sergiu Sanielevici,
Kevin Sayers
Abstract:
The importance of workflows is highlighted by the fact that they have underpinned some of the most significant discoveries of the past decades. Many of these workflows have significant computational, storage, and communication demands, and thus must execute on a range of large-scale computer systems, from local clusters to public clouds and upcoming exascale HPC platforms. Historically, infrastruc…
▽ More
The importance of workflows is highlighted by the fact that they have underpinned some of the most significant discoveries of the past decades. Many of these workflows have significant computational, storage, and communication demands, and thus must execute on a range of large-scale computer systems, from local clusters to public clouds and upcoming exascale HPC platforms. Historically, infrastructures for workflow execution consisted of complex, integrated systems, developed in-house by workflow practitioners with strong dependencies on a range of legacy technologies. Due to the increasing need to support workflows, dedicated workflow systems were developed to provide abstractions for creating, executing, and adapting workflows conveniently and efficiently while ensuring portability. While these efforts are all worthwhile individually, there are now hundreds of independent workflow systems. The resulting workflow system technology landscape is fragmented, which may present significant barriers for future workflow users due to many seemingly comparable, yet usually mutually incompatible, systems that exist. In order to tackle some of these challenges, the DOE-funded ExaWorks and NSF-funded WorkflowsRI projects have organized in 2021 a series of events entitled the "Workflows Community Summit". The third edition of the ``Workflows Community Summit" explored workflows challenges and opportunities from the perspective of computing centers and facilities. The third summit brought together a small group of facilities representatives with the aim to understand how workflows are currently being used at each facility, how facilities would like to interact with workflow developers and users, how workflows fit with facility roadmaps, and what opportunities there are for tighter integration between facilities and workflows. More information at: https://workflowsri.org/summits/facilities/
△ Less
Submitted 19 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
A Community Roadmap for Scientific Workflows Research and Development
Authors:
Rafael Ferreira da Silva,
Henri Casanova,
Kyle Chard,
Ilkay Altintas,
Rosa M Badia,
Bartosz Balis,
Tainã Coleman,
Frederik Coppens,
Frank Di Natale,
Bjoern Enders,
Thomas Fahringer,
Rosa Filgueira,
Grigori Fursin,
Daniel Garijo,
Carole Goble,
Dorran Howell,
Shantenu Jha,
Daniel S. Katz,
Daniel Laney,
Ulf Leser,
Maciej Malawski,
Kshitij Mehta,
Loïc Pottier,
Jonathan Ozik,
J. Luc Peterson
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The landscape of workflow systems for scientific applications is notoriously convoluted with hundreds of seemingly equivalent workflow systems, many isolated research claims, and a steep learning curve. To address some of these challenges and lay the groundwork for transforming workflows research and development, the WorkflowsRI and ExaWorks projects partnered to bring the international workflows…
▽ More
The landscape of workflow systems for scientific applications is notoriously convoluted with hundreds of seemingly equivalent workflow systems, many isolated research claims, and a steep learning curve. To address some of these challenges and lay the groundwork for transforming workflows research and development, the WorkflowsRI and ExaWorks projects partnered to bring the international workflows community together. This paper reports on discussions and findings from two virtual "Workflows Community Summits" (January and April, 2021). The overarching goals of these workshops were to develop a view of the state of the art, identify crucial research challenges in the workflows community, articulate a vision for potential community efforts, and discuss technical approaches for realizing this vision. To this end, participants identified six broad themes: FAIR computational workflows; AI workflows; exascale challenges; APIs, interoperability, reuse, and standards; training and education; and building a workflows community. We summarize discussions and recommendations for each of these themes.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2021; v1 submitted 5 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Real-Time XFEL Data Analysis at SLAC and NERSC: a Trial Run of Nascent Exascale Experimental Data Analysis
Authors:
Johannes P. Blaschke,
Aaron S. Brewster,
Daniel W. Paley,
Derek Mendez,
Asmit Bhowmick,
Nicholas K. Sauter,
Wilko Kröger,
Murali Shankar,
Bjoern Enders,
Deborah Bard
Abstract:
X-ray scattering experiments using Free Electron Lasers (XFELs) are a powerful tool to determine the molecular structure and function of unknown samples (such as COVID-19 viral proteins). XFEL experiments are a challenge to computing in two ways: i) due to the high cost of running XFELs, a fast turnaround time from data acquisition to data analysis is essential to make informed decisions on experi…
▽ More
X-ray scattering experiments using Free Electron Lasers (XFELs) are a powerful tool to determine the molecular structure and function of unknown samples (such as COVID-19 viral proteins). XFEL experiments are a challenge to computing in two ways: i) due to the high cost of running XFELs, a fast turnaround time from data acquisition to data analysis is essential to make informed decisions on experimental protocols; ii) data collection rates are growing exponentially, requiring new scalable algorithms. Here we report our experiences analyzing data from two experiments at the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) during September 2020. Raw data were analyzed on NERSC's Cori XC40 system, using the Superfacility paradigm: our workflow automatically moves raw data between LCLS and NERSC, where it is analyzed using the software package CCTBX. We achieved real time data analysis with a turnaround time from data acquisition to full molecular reconstruction in as little as 10 min -- sufficient time for the experiment's operators to make informed decisions. By hosting the data analysis on Cori, and by automating LCLS-NERSC interoperability, we achieved a data analysis rate which matches the data acquisition rate. Completing data analysis with 10 mins is a first for XFEL experiments and an important milestone if we are to keep up with data collection trends.
△ Less
Submitted 31 December, 2023; v1 submitted 21 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Workflows Community Summit: Advancing the State-of-the-art of Scientific Workflows Management Systems Research and Development
Authors:
Rafael Ferreira da Silva,
Henri Casanova,
Kyle Chard,
Tainã Coleman,
Dan Laney,
Dong Ahn,
Shantenu Jha,
Dorran Howell,
Stian Soiland-Reys,
Ilkay Altintas,
Douglas Thain,
Rosa Filgueira,
Yadu Babuji,
Rosa M. Badia,
Bartosz Balis,
Silvina Caino-Lores,
Scott Callaghan,
Frederik Coppens,
Michael R. Crusoe,
Kaushik De,
Frank Di Natale,
Tu M. A. Do,
Bjoern Enders,
Thomas Fahringer,
Anne Fouilloux
, et al. (33 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Scientific workflows are a cornerstone of modern scientific computing, and they have underpinned some of the most significant discoveries of the last decade. Many of these workflows have high computational, storage, and/or communication demands, and thus must execute on a wide range of large-scale platforms, from large clouds to upcoming exascale HPC platforms. Workflows will play a crucial role i…
▽ More
Scientific workflows are a cornerstone of modern scientific computing, and they have underpinned some of the most significant discoveries of the last decade. Many of these workflows have high computational, storage, and/or communication demands, and thus must execute on a wide range of large-scale platforms, from large clouds to upcoming exascale HPC platforms. Workflows will play a crucial role in the data-oriented and post-Moore's computing landscape as they democratize the application of cutting-edge research techniques, computationally intensive methods, and use of new computing platforms. As workflows continue to be adopted by scientific projects and user communities, they are becoming more complex. Workflows are increasingly composed of tasks that perform computations such as short machine learning inference, multi-node simulations, long-running machine learning model training, amongst others, and thus increasingly rely on heterogeneous architectures that include CPUs but also GPUs and accelerators. The workflow management system (WMS) technology landscape is currently segmented and presents significant barriers to entry due to the hundreds of seemingly comparable, yet incompatible, systems that exist. Another fundamental problem is that there are conflicting theoretical bases and abstractions for a WMS. Systems that use the same underlying abstractions can likely be translated between, which is not the case for systems that use different abstractions. More information: https://workflowsri.org/summits/technical
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Workflows Community Summit: Bringing the Scientific Workflows Community Together
Authors:
Rafael Ferreira da Silva,
Henri Casanova,
Kyle Chard,
Dan Laney,
Dong Ahn,
Shantenu Jha,
Carole Goble,
Lavanya Ramakrishnan,
Luc Peterson,
Bjoern Enders,
Douglas Thain,
Ilkay Altintas,
Yadu Babuji,
Rosa M. Badia,
Vivien Bonazzi,
Taina Coleman,
Michael Crusoe,
Ewa Deelman,
Frank Di Natale,
Paolo Di Tommaso,
Thomas Fahringer,
Rosa Filgueira,
Grigori Fursin,
Alex Ganose,
Bjorn Gruning
, et al. (20 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Scientific workflows have been used almost universally across scientific domains, and have underpinned some of the most significant discoveries of the past several decades. Many of these workflows have high computational, storage, and/or communication demands, and thus must execute on a wide range of large-scale platforms, from large clouds to upcoming exascale high-performance computing (HPC) pla…
▽ More
Scientific workflows have been used almost universally across scientific domains, and have underpinned some of the most significant discoveries of the past several decades. Many of these workflows have high computational, storage, and/or communication demands, and thus must execute on a wide range of large-scale platforms, from large clouds to upcoming exascale high-performance computing (HPC) platforms. These executions must be managed using some software infrastructure. Due to the popularity of workflows, workflow management systems (WMSs) have been developed to provide abstractions for creating and executing workflows conveniently, efficiently, and portably. While these efforts are all worthwhile, there are now hundreds of independent WMSs, many of which are moribund. As a result, the WMS landscape is segmented and presents significant barriers to entry due to the hundreds of seemingly comparable, yet incompatible, systems that exist. As a result, many teams, small and large, still elect to build their own custom workflow solution rather than adopt, or build upon, existing WMSs. This current state of the WMS landscape negatively impacts workflow users, developers, and researchers. The "Workflows Community Summit" was held online on January 13, 2021. The overarching goal of the summit was to develop a view of the state of the art and identify crucial research challenges in the workflow community. Prior to the summit, a survey sent to stakeholders in the workflow community (including both developers of WMSs and users of workflows) helped to identify key challenges in this community that were translated into 6 broad themes for the summit, each of them being the object of a focused discussion led by a volunteer member of the community. This report documents and organizes the wealth of information provided by the participants before, during, and after the summit.
△ Less
Submitted 16 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
