Skip to main content

Showing 1–10 of 10 results for author: Frisken, S

  1. arXiv:2405.09959  [pdf, other

    eess.IV cs.CV

    Patient-Specific Real-Time Segmentation in Trackerless Brain Ultrasound

    Authors: Reuben Dorent, Erickson Torio, Nazim Haouchine, Colin Galvin, Sarah Frisken, Alexandra Golby, Tina Kapur, William Wells

    Abstract: Intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) imaging has the potential to improve surgical outcomes in brain surgery. However, its interpretation is challenging, even for expert neurosurgeons. In this work, we designed the first patient-specific framework that performs brain tumor segmentation in trackerless iUS. To disambiguate ultrasound imaging and adapt to the neurosurgeon's surgical objective, a patient-s… ▽ More

    Submitted 16 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

    Comments: Early accept at MICCAI 2024 - code available at: https://github.com/ReubenDo/MHVAE-Seg

  2. arXiv:2402.09636  [pdf, other

    eess.IV cs.CV

    Spatiotemporal Disentanglement of Arteriovenous Malformations in Digital Subtraction Angiography

    Authors: Kathleen Baur, Xin Xiong, Erickson Torio, Rose Du, Parikshit Juvekar, Reuben Dorent, Alexandra Golby, Sarah Frisken, Nazim Haouchine

    Abstract: Although Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) is the most important imaging for visualizing cerebrovascular anatomy, its interpretation by clinicians remains difficult. This is particularly true when treating arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), where entangled vasculature connecting arteries and veins needs to be carefully identified.The presented method aims to enhance DSA image series by highli… ▽ More

    Submitted 14 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

    Comments: Paper accepted for publication at SPIE Medical Imaging 2024

  3. arXiv:2401.14906  [pdf, other

    cs.GR cs.CG

    A High-Performance SurfaceNets Discrete Isocontouring Algorithm

    Authors: Will Schroeder, Spiros Tsalikis, Michael Halle, Sarah Frisken

    Abstract: Isocontouring is one of the most widely used visualization techniques. However, many popular contouring algorithms were created prior to the advent of ubiquitous parallel approaches, such as multi-core, shared memory computing systems. With increasing data sizes and computational loads, it is essential to reimagine such algorithms to leverage the increased computing capabilities available today. T… ▽ More

    Submitted 26 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

  4. arXiv:2310.01735  [pdf, other

    cs.CV cs.AI

    Learning Expected Appearances for Intraoperative Registration during Neurosurgery

    Authors: Nazim Haouchine, Reuben Dorent, Parikshit Juvekar, Erickson Torio, William M. Wells III, Tina Kapur, Alexandra J. Golby, Sarah Frisken

    Abstract: We present a novel method for intraoperative patient-to-image registration by learning Expected Appearances. Our method uses preoperative imaging to synthesize patient-specific expected views through a surgical microscope for a predicted range of transformations. Our method estimates the camera pose by minimizing the dissimilarity between the intraoperative 2D view through the optical microscope a… ▽ More

    Submitted 2 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

    Comments: Accepted at MICCAI 2023

  5. Unified Brain MR-Ultrasound Synthesis using Multi-Modal Hierarchical Representations

    Authors: Reuben Dorent, Nazim Haouchine, Fryderyk Kögl, Samuel Joutard, Parikshit Juvekar, Erickson Torio, Alexandra Golby, Sebastien Ourselin, Sarah Frisken, Tom Vercauteren, Tina Kapur, William M. Wells

    Abstract: We introduce MHVAE, a deep hierarchical variational auto-encoder (VAE) that synthesizes missing images from various modalities. Extending multi-modal VAEs with a hierarchical latent structure, we introduce a probabilistic formulation for fusing multi-modal images in a common latent representation while having the flexibility to handle incomplete image sets as input. Moreover, adversarial learning… ▽ More

    Submitted 19 September, 2023; v1 submitted 15 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

    Comments: Accepted at MICCAI 2023

  6. arXiv:2107.02433  [pdf, other

    cs.CV eess.IV

    Double-Uncertainty Guided Spatial and Temporal Consistency Regularization Weighting for Learning-based Abdominal Registration

    Authors: Zhe Xu, Jie Luo, Donghuan Lu, Jiangpeng Yan, Sarah Frisken, Jayender Jagadeesan, William Wells III, Xiu Li, Yefeng Zheng, Raymond Tong

    Abstract: In order to tackle the difficulty associated with the ill-posed nature of the image registration problem, regularization is often used to constrain the solution space. For most learning-based registration approaches, the regularization usually has a fixed weight and only constrains the spatial transformation. Such convention has two limitations: (i) Besides the laborious grid search for the optima… ▽ More

    Submitted 2 March, 2022; v1 submitted 6 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

    Comments: 11 pages

  7. arXiv:2003.09483  [pdf, ps, other

    cs.CV

    Do Public Datasets Assure Unbiased Comparisons for Registration Evaluation?

    Authors: Jie Luo, Guangshen Ma, Sarah Frisken, Parikshit Juvekar, Nazim Haouchine, Zhe Xu, Yiming Xiao, Alexandra Golby, Patrick Codd, Masashi Sugiyama, William Wells III

    Abstract: With the increasing availability of new image registration approaches, an unbiased evaluation is becoming more needed so that clinicians can choose the most suitable approaches for their applications. Current evaluations typically use landmarks in manually annotated datasets. As a result, the quality of annotations is crucial for unbiased comparisons. Even though most data providers claim to have… ▽ More

    Submitted 20 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

    Comments: Draft 1

  8. arXiv:1908.07709  [pdf, ps, other

    cs.CV

    Are Registration Uncertainty and Error Monotonically Associated

    Authors: Jie Luo, Sarah Frisken, Duo Wang, Alexandra Golby, Masashi Sugiyama, William M. Wells III

    Abstract: In image-guided neurosurgery, current commercial systems usually provide only rigid registration, partly because it is harder to predict, validate and understand non-rigid registration error. For instance, when surgeons see a discrepancy in aligned image features, they may not be able to distinguish between registration error and actual tissue deformation caused by tumor resection. In this case, t… ▽ More

    Submitted 20 March, 2020; v1 submitted 21 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.

    Comments: Draft Ver.2

  9. arXiv:1803.07682  [pdf, other

    cs.CV

    A Feature-Driven Active Framework for Ultrasound-Based Brain Shift Compensation

    Authors: Jie Luo, Matt Toews, Ines Machado, Sarah Frisken, Miaomiao Zhang, Frank Preiswerk, Alireza Sedghi, Hongyi Ding, Steve Pieper, Polina Golland, Alexandra Golby, Masashi Sugiyama, William M. Wells III

    Abstract: A reliable Ultrasound (US)-to-US registration method to compensate for brain shift would substantially improve Image-Guided Neurological Surgery. Developing such a registration method is very challenging, due to factors such as missing correspondence in images, the complexity of brain pathology and the demand for fast computation. We propose a novel feature-driven active framework. Here, landmarks… ▽ More

    Submitted 20 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.

  10. arXiv:1803.05266  [pdf, other

    cs.CV

    On the Applicability of Registration Uncertainty

    Authors: Jie Luo, Alireza Sedghi, Karteek Popuri, Dana Cobzas, Miaomiao Zhang, Frank Preiswerk, Matthew Toews, Alexandra Golby, Masashi Sugiyama, William M. Wells III, Sarah Frisken

    Abstract: Estimating the uncertainty in (probabilistic) image registration enables, e.g., surgeons to assess the operative risk based on the trustworthiness of the registered image data. If surgeons receive inaccurately calculated registration uncertainty and misplace unwarranted confidence in the alignment solutions, severe consequences may result. For probabilistic image registration (PIR), the predominan… ▽ More

    Submitted 22 April, 2020; v1 submitted 14 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.

    Comments: MICCAI 2019. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1704.08121