-
Does learning the right latent variables necessarily improve in-context learning?
Authors:
Sarthak Mittal,
Eric Elmoznino,
Leo Gagnon,
Sangnie Bhardwaj,
Dhanya Sridhar,
Guillaume Lajoie
Abstract:
Large autoregressive models like Transformers can solve tasks through in-context learning (ICL) without learning new weights, suggesting avenues for efficiently solving new tasks. For many tasks, e.g., linear regression, the data factorizes: examples are independent given a task latent that generates the data, e.g., linear coefficients. While an optimal predictor leverages this factorization by in…
▽ More
Large autoregressive models like Transformers can solve tasks through in-context learning (ICL) without learning new weights, suggesting avenues for efficiently solving new tasks. For many tasks, e.g., linear regression, the data factorizes: examples are independent given a task latent that generates the data, e.g., linear coefficients. While an optimal predictor leverages this factorization by inferring task latents, it is unclear if Transformers implicitly do so or if they instead exploit heuristics and statistical shortcuts enabled by attention layers. Both scenarios have inspired active ongoing work. In this paper, we systematically investigate the effect of explicitly inferring task latents. We minimally modify the Transformer architecture with a bottleneck designed to prevent shortcuts in favor of more structured solutions, and then compare performance against standard Transformers across various ICL tasks. Contrary to intuition and some recent works, we find little discernible difference between the two; biasing towards task-relevant latent variables does not lead to better out-of-distribution performance, in general. Curiously, we find that while the bottleneck effectively learns to extract latent task variables from context, downstream processing struggles to utilize them for robust prediction. Our study highlights the intrinsic limitations of Transformers in achieving structured ICL solutions that generalize, and shows that while inferring the right latents aids interpretability, it is not sufficient to alleviate this problem.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2024: Meningioma Radiotherapy Planning Automated Segmentation
Authors:
Dominic LaBella,
Katherine Schumacher,
Michael Mix,
Kevin Leu,
Shan McBurney-Lin,
Pierre Nedelec,
Javier Villanueva-Meyer,
Jonathan Shapey,
Tom Vercauteren,
Kazumi Chia,
Omar Al-Salihi,
Justin Leu,
Lia Halasz,
Yury Velichko,
Chunhao Wang,
John Kirkpatrick,
Scott Floyd,
Zachary J. Reitman,
Trey Mullikin,
Ulas Bagci,
Sean Sachdev,
Jona A. Hattangadi-Gluth,
Tyler Seibert,
Nikdokht Farid,
Connor Puett
, et al. (45 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The 2024 Brain Tumor Segmentation Meningioma Radiotherapy (BraTS-MEN-RT) challenge aims to advance automated segmentation algorithms using the largest known multi-institutional dataset of radiotherapy planning brain MRIs with expert-annotated target labels for patients with intact or post-operative meningioma that underwent either conventional external beam radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurger…
▽ More
The 2024 Brain Tumor Segmentation Meningioma Radiotherapy (BraTS-MEN-RT) challenge aims to advance automated segmentation algorithms using the largest known multi-institutional dataset of radiotherapy planning brain MRIs with expert-annotated target labels for patients with intact or post-operative meningioma that underwent either conventional external beam radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery. Each case includes a defaced 3D post-contrast T1-weighted radiotherapy planning MRI in its native acquisition space, accompanied by a single-label "target volume" representing the gross tumor volume (GTV) and any at-risk post-operative site. Target volume annotations adhere to established radiotherapy planning protocols, ensuring consistency across cases and institutions. For pre-operative meningiomas, the target volume encompasses the entire GTV and associated nodular dural tail, while for post-operative cases, it includes at-risk resection cavity margins as determined by the treating institution. Case annotations were reviewed and approved by expert neuroradiologists and radiation oncologists. Participating teams will develop, containerize, and evaluate automated segmentation models using this comprehensive dataset. Model performance will be assessed using the lesion-wise Dice Similarity Coefficient and the 95% Hausdorff distance. The top-performing teams will be recognized at the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention Conference in October 2024. BraTS-MEN-RT is expected to significantly advance automated radiotherapy planning by enabling precise tumor segmentation and facilitating tailored treatment, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
The 2024 Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge: Glioma Segmentation on Post-treatment MRI
Authors:
Maria Correia de Verdier,
Rachit Saluja,
Louis Gagnon,
Dominic LaBella,
Ujjwall Baid,
Nourel Hoda Tahon,
Martha Foltyn-Dumitru,
Jikai Zhang,
Maram Alafif,
Saif Baig,
Ken Chang,
Gennaro D'Anna,
Lisa Deptula,
Diviya Gupta,
Muhammad Ammar Haider,
Ali Hussain,
Michael Iv,
Marinos Kontzialis,
Paul Manning,
Farzan Moodi,
Teresa Nunes,
Aaron Simon,
Nico Sollmann,
David Vu,
Maruf Adewole
, et al. (60 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Gliomas are the most common malignant primary brain tumors in adults and one of the deadliest types of cancer. There are many challenges in treatment and monitoring due to the genetic diversity and high intrinsic heterogeneity in appearance, shape, histology, and treatment response. Treatments include surgery, radiation, and systemic therapies, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) playing a key r…
▽ More
Gliomas are the most common malignant primary brain tumors in adults and one of the deadliest types of cancer. There are many challenges in treatment and monitoring due to the genetic diversity and high intrinsic heterogeneity in appearance, shape, histology, and treatment response. Treatments include surgery, radiation, and systemic therapies, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) playing a key role in treatment planning and post-treatment longitudinal assessment. The 2024 Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge on post-treatment glioma MRI will provide a community standard and benchmark for state-of-the-art automated segmentation models based on the largest expert-annotated post-treatment glioma MRI dataset. Challenge competitors will develop automated segmentation models to predict four distinct tumor sub-regions consisting of enhancing tissue (ET), surrounding non-enhancing T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensity (SNFH), non-enhancing tumor core (NETC), and resection cavity (RC). Models will be evaluated on separate validation and test datasets using standardized performance metrics utilized across the BraTS 2024 cluster of challenges, including lesion-wise Dice Similarity Coefficient and Hausdorff Distance. Models developed during this challenge will advance the field of automated MRI segmentation and contribute to their integration into clinical practice, ultimately enhancing patient care.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Clarifying MCMC-based training of modern EBMs : Contrastive Divergence versus Maximum Likelihood
Authors:
Léo Gagnon,
Guillaume Lajoie
Abstract:
The Energy-Based Model (EBM) framework is a very general approach to generative modeling that tries to learn and exploit probability distributions only defined though unnormalized scores. It has risen in popularity recently thanks to the impressive results obtained in image generation by parameterizing the distribution with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). However, the motivation and theoretic…
▽ More
The Energy-Based Model (EBM) framework is a very general approach to generative modeling that tries to learn and exploit probability distributions only defined though unnormalized scores. It has risen in popularity recently thanks to the impressive results obtained in image generation by parameterizing the distribution with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). However, the motivation and theoretical foundations behind modern EBMs are often absent from recent papers and this sometimes results in some confusion. In particular, the theoretical justifications behind the popular MCMC-based learning algorithm Contrastive Divergence (CD) are often glossed over and we find that this leads to theoretical errors in recent influential papers (Du & Mordatch, 2019; Du et al., 2020). After offering a first-principles introduction of MCMC-based training, we argue that the learning algorithm they use can in fact not be described as CD and reinterpret theirs methods in light of a new interpretation. Finally, we discuss the implications of our new interpretation and provide some illustrative experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Efficient and robust multi-task learning in the brain with modular latent primitives
Authors:
Christian David Márton,
Léo Gagnon,
Guillaume Lajoie,
Kanaka Rajan
Abstract:
Biological agents do not have infinite resources to learn new things. For this reason, a central aspect of human learning is the ability to recycle previously acquired knowledge in a way that allows for faster, less resource-intensive acquisition of new skills. In spite of that, how neural networks in the brain leverage existing knowledge to learn new computations is not well understood. In this w…
▽ More
Biological agents do not have infinite resources to learn new things. For this reason, a central aspect of human learning is the ability to recycle previously acquired knowledge in a way that allows for faster, less resource-intensive acquisition of new skills. In spite of that, how neural networks in the brain leverage existing knowledge to learn new computations is not well understood. In this work, we study this question in artificial recurrent neural networks (RNNs) trained on a corpus of commonly used neuroscience tasks. Combining brain-inspired inductive biases we call functional and structural, we propose a system that learns new tasks by building on top of pre-trained latent dynamics organised into separate recurrent modules. These modules, acting as prior knowledge acquired previously through evolution or development, are pre-trained on the statistics of the full corpus of tasks so as to be independent and maximally informative. The resulting model, we call a Modular Latent Primitives (MoLaP) network, allows for learning multiple tasks while keeping parameter counts, and updates, low. We also show that the skills acquired with our approach are more robust to a broad range of perturbations compared to those acquired with other multi-task learning strategies, and that generalisation to new tasks is facilitated. This work offers a new perspective on achieving efficient multi-task learning in the brain, illustrating the benefits of leveraging pre-trained latent dynamical primitives.
△ Less
Submitted 25 May, 2022; v1 submitted 28 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
