-
Pseudo-Entanglement is Necessary for EFI Pairs
Authors:
Manuel Goulão,
David Elkouss
Abstract:
Regarding minimal assumptions, most of classical cryptography is known to depend on the existence of One-Way Functions (OWFs). However, recent evidence has shown that this is not the case when considering quantum resources. Besides the well known unconditional security of Quantum Key Distribution, it is now known that computational cryptography may be built on weaker primitives than OWFs, e.g., ps…
▽ More
Regarding minimal assumptions, most of classical cryptography is known to depend on the existence of One-Way Functions (OWFs). However, recent evidence has shown that this is not the case when considering quantum resources. Besides the well known unconditional security of Quantum Key Distribution, it is now known that computational cryptography may be built on weaker primitives than OWFs, e.g., pseudo-random states [JLS18], one-way state generators [MY23], or EFI pairs of states [BCQ23]. We consider a new quantum resource, pseudo-entanglement, and show that the existence of EFI pairs, one of the current main candidates for the weakest computational assumption for cryptography (necessary for commitments, oblivious transfer, secure multi-party computation, computational zero-knowledge proofs), implies the existence of pseudo-entanglement, as defined by [ABF+24, ABV23] under some reasonable adaptations. We prove this by constructing a new family of pseudo-entangled quantum states given only EFI pairs. Our result has important implications for the field of computational cryptography. It shows that if pseudo-entanglement does not exist, then most of cryptography cannot exist either. Moreover, it establishes pseudo-entanglement as a new minimal assumption for most of computational cryptography, which may pave the way for the unification of other assumptions into a single primitive. Finally, pseudo-entanglement connects physical phenomena and efficient computation, thus, our result strengthens the connection between cryptography and the physical world.
△ Less
Submitted 10 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Human Factors in Model-Driven Engineering: Future Research Goals and Initiatives for MDE
Authors:
Grischa Liebel,
Jil Klünder,
Regina Hebig,
Christopher Lazik,
Inês Nunes,
Isabella Graßl,
Jan-Philipp Steghöfer,
Joeri Exelmans,
Julian Oertel,
Kai Marquardt,
Katharina Juhnke,
Kurt Schneider,
Lucas Gren,
Lucia Happe,
Marc Herrmann,
Marvin Wyrich,
Matthias Tichy,
Miguel Goulão,
Rebekka Wohlrab,
Reyhaneh Kalantari,
Robert Heinrich,
Sandra Greiner,
Satrio Adi Rukmono,
Shalini Chakraborty,
Silvia Abrahão
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Purpose: Software modelling and Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) is traditionally studied from a technical perspective. However, one of the core motivations behind the use of software models is inherently human-centred. Models aim to enable practitioners to communicate about software designs, make software understandable, or make software easier to write through domain-specific modelling languages.…
▽ More
Purpose: Software modelling and Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) is traditionally studied from a technical perspective. However, one of the core motivations behind the use of software models is inherently human-centred. Models aim to enable practitioners to communicate about software designs, make software understandable, or make software easier to write through domain-specific modelling languages. Several recent studies challenge the idea that these aims can always be reached and indicate that human factors play a role in the success of MDE. However, there is an under-representation of research focusing on human factors in modelling. Methods: During a GI-Dagstuhl seminar, topics related to human factors in modelling were discussed by 26 expert participants from research and industry. Results: In breakout groups, five topics were covered in depth, namely modelling human aspects, factors of modeller experience, diversity and inclusion in MDE, collaboration and MDE, and teaching human-aware MDE. Conclusion: We summarise our insights gained during the discussions on the five topics. We formulate research goals, questions, and propositions that support directing future initiatives towards an MDE community that is aware of and supportive of human factors and values.
△ Less
Submitted 29 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Unleashing the Power of Sound: Revisiting the Physics of Notations for Modelling with auditory symbols
Authors:
Nuno Guerreiro,
Vasco Amaral,
Miguel Goulão
Abstract:
Sound - the oft-neglected sense for Software Engineering - is a crucial component of our daily lives, playing a vital role in how we interact with the world around us. In this paper, we challenge the traditional boundaries of Software Engineering by proposing a new approach based on sound design for using sound in modelling tools that is on par with visual design. By drawing upon the seminal work…
▽ More
Sound - the oft-neglected sense for Software Engineering - is a crucial component of our daily lives, playing a vital role in how we interact with the world around us. In this paper, we challenge the traditional boundaries of Software Engineering by proposing a new approach based on sound design for using sound in modelling tools that is on par with visual design. By drawing upon the seminal work of Moody on the `Physics' of Notations for visual design, we develop a comprehensive catalogue of principles that can guide the design of sound notations.
Using these principles, we develop a catalogue of sounds for UML and report on an empirical study that supports their usefulness. Our study lays the foundation for building more sophisticated sound-based notations. The guidelines for designing symbolic sounds for software models are an essential starting point for a new research thread that could significantly and effectively enable the use of sound in modelling tools.
△ Less
Submitted 17 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Pretraining the Vision Transformer using self-supervised methods for vision based Deep Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Manuel Goulão,
Arlindo L. Oliveira
Abstract:
The Vision Transformer architecture has shown to be competitive in the computer vision (CV) space where it has dethroned convolution-based networks in several benchmarks. Nevertheless, convolutional neural networks (CNN) remain the preferential architecture for the representation module in reinforcement learning. In this work, we study pretraining a Vision Transformer using several state-of-the-ar…
▽ More
The Vision Transformer architecture has shown to be competitive in the computer vision (CV) space where it has dethroned convolution-based networks in several benchmarks. Nevertheless, convolutional neural networks (CNN) remain the preferential architecture for the representation module in reinforcement learning. In this work, we study pretraining a Vision Transformer using several state-of-the-art self-supervised methods and assess the quality of the learned representations. To show the importance of the temporal dimension in this context we propose an extension of VICReg to better capture temporal relations between observations by adding a temporal order verification task. Our results show that all methods are effective in learning useful representations and avoiding representational collapse for observations from Atari Learning Environment (ALE) which leads to improvements in data efficiency when we evaluated in reinforcement learning (RL). Moreover, the encoder pretrained with the temporal order verification task shows the best results across all experiments, with richer representations, more focused attention maps and sparser representation vectors throughout the layers of the encoder, which shows the importance of exploring such similarity dimension. With this work, we hope to provide some insights into the representations learned by ViT during a self-supervised pretraining with observations from RL environments and which properties arise in the representations that lead to the best-performing agents. The source code will be available at: https://github.com/mgoulao/TOV-VICReg
△ Less
Submitted 18 July, 2023; v1 submitted 22 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
A Comparison of Maps Application Programming Interfaces
Authors:
Ana Isabel Fernandes,
Miguel Goulão,
Armanda Rodrigues
Abstract:
The development of web applications that manipulate geo-referenced information is often supported by Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), al-lowing a fast development cycle for high quality applications. APIs can be used by programmers with different expertise levels and choosing an adequate API may have a dramatic impact on the productivity achieved by those programmers. Our goal is to comp…
▽ More
The development of web applications that manipulate geo-referenced information is often supported by Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), al-lowing a fast development cycle for high quality applications. APIs can be used by programmers with different expertise levels and choosing an adequate API may have a dramatic impact on the productivity achieved by those programmers. Our goal is to compare maps APIs with respect to their usability. We compare three different APIs: the Google Maps JavaScript API, the ArcGIS API for JavaScript, and the OpenLayers JavaScript Mapping Library. Our comparison is supported by a set of software metrics and is performed in two orthogonal ways: the comparison of three implementations of the same system prototype, each using one of the APIs under scrutiny; the comparison of the APIs specifications. The main results of the study are related to the size of the APIs, with the Google API being significantly smaller than the others.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2013;
originally announced May 2013.
-
An overview of metrics-based approaches to support software components reusability assessment
Authors:
Miguel Goulão,
Fernando Brito e Abreu
Abstract:
Objective: To present an overview on the current state of the art concerning metrics-based quality evaluation of software components and component assemblies. Method: Comparison of several approaches available in the literature, using a framework comprising several aspects, such as scope, intent, definition technique, and maturity. Results: The identification of common shortcomings of current appr…
▽ More
Objective: To present an overview on the current state of the art concerning metrics-based quality evaluation of software components and component assemblies. Method: Comparison of several approaches available in the literature, using a framework comprising several aspects, such as scope, intent, definition technique, and maturity. Results: The identification of common shortcomings of current approaches, such as ambiguity in definition, lack of adequacy of the specifying formalisms and insufficient validation of current quality models and metrics for software components. Conclusions: Quality evaluation of components and component-based infrastructures presents new challenges to the Experimental Software Engineering community.
△ Less
Submitted 30 September, 2011;
originally announced September 2011.
-
Do Software Languages Engineers Evaluate their Languages?
Authors:
Pedro Gabriel,
Miguel Goulão,
Vasco Amaral
Abstract:
Domain Specific Languages (DSLs) can contribute to increment productivity, while reducing the required maintenance and programming expertise. We hypothesize that Software Languages Engineering (SLE) developers consistently skip, or relax, Language Evaluation. Based on the experience of engineering other types of software products, we assume that this may potentially lead to the deployment of inade…
▽ More
Domain Specific Languages (DSLs) can contribute to increment productivity, while reducing the required maintenance and programming expertise. We hypothesize that Software Languages Engineering (SLE) developers consistently skip, or relax, Language Evaluation. Based on the experience of engineering other types of software products, we assume that this may potentially lead to the deployment of inadequate languages. The fact that the languages already deal with concepts from the problem domain, and not the solution domain, is not enough to validate several issues at stake, such as its expressiveness, usability, effectiveness, maintainability, or even the domain expert's productivity while using them. We present a systematic review on articles published in top ranked venues, from 2001 to 2008, which report DSLs' construction, to characterize the common practice. This work confirms our initial hypothesis and lays the ground for the discussion on how to include a systematic approach to DSL evaluation in the SLE process.
△ Less
Submitted 30 September, 2011;
originally announced September 2011.
-
Evidence-Based Comparison of Modularity Support Between Java and Object Teams
Authors:
Arlindo Lima,
Miguel Goulão,
Miguel Pessoa Monteiro
Abstract:
Background: Aspect-oriented programming (AOP) is an emerging programming paradigm whose focus is about improving modularity, with an emphasis on the modularization of crosscutting concerns.
Objective: The goal of this paper is to assess the extent to which an AOP language -ObjectTeams/Java (OT/J) -improves the modularity of a software system. This improvement has been claimed but, to the best of…
▽ More
Background: Aspect-oriented programming (AOP) is an emerging programming paradigm whose focus is about improving modularity, with an emphasis on the modularization of crosscutting concerns.
Objective: The goal of this paper is to assess the extent to which an AOP language -ObjectTeams/Java (OT/J) -improves the modularity of a software system. This improvement has been claimed but, to the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first attempting to present quantitative evidence of it.
Method: We compare functionally-equivalent implementations of the Gang-of-Four design patterns, developed in Java and OT/J, using software metrics.
Results: The results of our comparison support the modularity improvement claims made in the literature. For six of the seven metrics used, the OT/J versions of the patterns obtained significantly better results.
Limitations: This work uses a set of metrics originally defined for object-oriented (OO) systems. It may be the case that the metrics are biased, in that they were created in the context of OO programming (OOP), before the advent of AOP. We consider this comparison a stepping stone as, ultimately, we plan to assess the modularity improvements with paradigm independent metrics, which will conceivably eliminate the bias. Each individual example from the sample used in this paper is small. In future, we plan to replicate this experiment using larger systems, where the benefits of AOP may be more noticeable.
Conclusion: This work contributes with evidence to fill gaps in the body of quantitative results supporting alleged benefits to software modularity brought by AOP languages, namely OT/J.
△ Less
Submitted 9 September, 2011;
originally announced September 2011.
