-
The Vertebrate Breed Ontology: Towards Effective Breed Data Standardization
Authors:
Kathleen R. Mullen,
Imke Tammen,
Nicolas A. Matentzoglu,
Marius Mather,
Christopher J. Mungall,
Melissa A. Haendel,
Frank W. Nicholas,
Sabrina Toro,
the Vertebrate Breed Ontology Consortium
Abstract:
Background: Limited universally adopted data standards in veterinary science hinders data interoperability and therefore integration and comparison; this ultimately impedes application of existing information-based tools to support advancement in veterinary diagnostics, treatments, and precision medicine.
Objectives: Creation of a Vertebrate Breed Ontology (VBO) as a single, coherent logic-based…
▽ More
Background: Limited universally adopted data standards in veterinary science hinders data interoperability and therefore integration and comparison; this ultimately impedes application of existing information-based tools to support advancement in veterinary diagnostics, treatments, and precision medicine.
Objectives: Creation of a Vertebrate Breed Ontology (VBO) as a single, coherent logic-based standard for documenting breed names in animal health, production and research-related records will improve data use capabilities in veterinary and comparative medicine.
Animals: No live animals were used in this study.
Methods: A list of breed names and related information was compiled from relevant sources, organizations, communities, and experts using manual and computational approaches to create VBO. Each breed is represented by a VBO term that includes all provenance and the breed's related information as metadata. VBO terms are classified using description logic to allow computational applications and Artificial Intelligence-readiness.
Results: VBO is an open, community-driven ontology representing over 19,000 livestock and companion animal breeds covering 41 species. Breeds are classified based on community and expert conventions (e.g., horse breed, cattle breed). This classification is supported by relations to the breeds' genus and species indicated by NCBI Taxonomy terms. Relationships between VBO terms, e.g. relating breeds to their foundation stock, provide additional context to support advanced data analytics. VBO term metadata includes common names and synonyms, breed identifiers or codes, and attributed cross-references to other databases.
Conclusion and clinical importance: Veterinary data interoperability and computability can be enhanced by the adoption of VBO as a source of standard breed names in databases and veterinary electronic health records.
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Methods for Linking Data to Online Resources and Ontologies with Applications to Neurophysiology
Authors:
Matthew Avaylon,
Ryan Ly,
Andrew Tritt,
Benjamin Dichter,
Kristofer E. Bouchard,
Christopher J. Mungall,
Oliver Ruebel
Abstract:
Across many domains, large swaths of digital assets are being stored across distributed data repositories, e.g., the DANDI Archive [8]. The distribution and diversity of these repositories impede researchers from formally defining terminology within experiments, integrating information across datasets, and easily querying, reusing, and analyzing data that follow the FAIR principles [15]. As such,…
▽ More
Across many domains, large swaths of digital assets are being stored across distributed data repositories, e.g., the DANDI Archive [8]. The distribution and diversity of these repositories impede researchers from formally defining terminology within experiments, integrating information across datasets, and easily querying, reusing, and analyzing data that follow the FAIR principles [15]. As such, it has become increasingly important to have a standardized method to attach contextual metadata to datasets. Neuroscience is an exemplary use case of this issue due to the complex multimodal nature of experiments. Here, we present the HDMF External Resources Data (HERD) standard and related tools, enabling researchers to annotate new and existing datasets by mapping external references to the data without requiring modification of the original dataset. We integrated HERD closely with Neurodata Without Borders (NWB) [2], a widely used data standard for sharing and storing neurophysiology data. By integrating with NWB, our tools provide neuroscientists with the capability to more easily create and manage neurophysiology data in compliance with controlled sets of terms, enhancing rigor and accuracy of data and facilitating data reuse.
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
The Artificial Intelligence Ontology: LLM-assisted construction of AI concept hierarchies
Authors:
Marcin P. Joachimiak,
Mark A. Miller,
J. Harry Caufield,
Ryan Ly,
Nomi L. Harris,
Andrew Tritt,
Christopher J. Mungall,
Kristofer E. Bouchard
Abstract:
The Artificial Intelligence Ontology (AIO) is a systematization of artificial intelligence (AI) concepts, methodologies, and their interrelations. Developed via manual curation, with the additional assistance of large language models (LLMs), AIO aims to address the rapidly evolving landscape of AI by providing a comprehensive framework that encompasses both technical and ethical aspects of AI tech…
▽ More
The Artificial Intelligence Ontology (AIO) is a systematization of artificial intelligence (AI) concepts, methodologies, and their interrelations. Developed via manual curation, with the additional assistance of large language models (LLMs), AIO aims to address the rapidly evolving landscape of AI by providing a comprehensive framework that encompasses both technical and ethical aspects of AI technologies. The primary audience for AIO includes AI researchers, developers, and educators seeking standardized terminology and concepts within the AI domain. The ontology is structured around six top-level branches: Networks, Layers, Functions, LLMs, Preprocessing, and Bias, each designed to support the modular composition of AI methods and facilitate a deeper understanding of deep learning architectures and ethical considerations in AI.
AIO's development utilized the Ontology Development Kit (ODK) for its creation and maintenance, with its content being dynamically updated through AI-driven curation support. This approach not only ensures the ontology's relevance amidst the fast-paced advancements in AI but also significantly enhances its utility for researchers, developers, and educators by simplifying the integration of new AI concepts and methodologies.
The ontology's utility is demonstrated through the annotation of AI methods data in a catalog of AI research publications and the integration into the BioPortal ontology resource, highlighting its potential for cross-disciplinary research. The AIO ontology is open source and is available on GitHub (https://github.com/berkeleybop/artificial-intelligence-ontology) and BioPortal (https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/AIO).
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation of Ontologies using Artificial Intelligence (DRAGON-AI)
Authors:
Sabrina Toro,
Anna V Anagnostopoulos,
Sue Bello,
Kai Blumberg,
Rhiannon Cameron,
Leigh Carmody,
Alexander D Diehl,
Damion Dooley,
William Duncan,
Petra Fey,
Pascale Gaudet,
Nomi L Harris,
Marcin Joachimiak,
Leila Kiani,
Tiago Lubiana,
Monica C Munoz-Torres,
Shawn O'Neil,
David Osumi-Sutherland,
Aleix Puig,
Justin P Reese,
Leonore Reiser,
Sofia Robb,
Troy Ruemping,
James Seager,
Eric Sid
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Background: Ontologies are fundamental components of informatics infrastructure in domains such as biomedical, environmental, and food sciences, representing consensus knowledge in an accurate and computable form. However, their construction and maintenance demand substantial resources and necessitate substantial collaboration between domain experts, curators, and ontology experts. We present Dyna…
▽ More
Background: Ontologies are fundamental components of informatics infrastructure in domains such as biomedical, environmental, and food sciences, representing consensus knowledge in an accurate and computable form. However, their construction and maintenance demand substantial resources and necessitate substantial collaboration between domain experts, curators, and ontology experts. We present Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation of Ontologies using AI (DRAGON-AI), an ontology generation method employing Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). DRAGON-AI can generate textual and logical ontology components, drawing from existing knowledge in multiple ontologies and unstructured text sources.
Results: We assessed performance of DRAGON-AI on de novo term construction across ten diverse ontologies, making use of extensive manual evaluation of results. Our method has high precision for relationship generation, but has slightly lower precision than from logic-based reasoning. Our method is also able to generate definitions deemed acceptable by expert evaluators, but these scored worse than human-authored definitions. Notably, evaluators with the highest level of confidence in a domain were better able to discern flaws in AI-generated definitions. We also demonstrated the ability of DRAGON-AI to incorporate natural language instructions in the form of GitHub issues.
Conclusions: These findings suggest DRAGON-AI's potential to substantially aid the manual ontology construction process. However, our results also underscore the importance of having expert curators and ontology editors drive the ontology generation process.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2024; v1 submitted 17 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Automated Annotation of Scientific Texts for ML-based Keyphrase Extraction and Validation
Authors:
Oluwamayowa O. Amusat,
Harshad Hegde,
Christopher J. Mungall,
Anna Giannakou,
Neil P. Byers,
Dan Gunter,
Kjiersten Fagnan,
Lavanya Ramakrishnan
Abstract:
Advanced omics technologies and facilities generate a wealth of valuable data daily; however, the data often lacks the essential metadata required for researchers to find and search them effectively. The lack of metadata poses a significant challenge in the utilization of these datasets. Machine learning-based metadata extraction techniques have emerged as a potentially viable approach to automati…
▽ More
Advanced omics technologies and facilities generate a wealth of valuable data daily; however, the data often lacks the essential metadata required for researchers to find and search them effectively. The lack of metadata poses a significant challenge in the utilization of these datasets. Machine learning-based metadata extraction techniques have emerged as a potentially viable approach to automatically annotating scientific datasets with the metadata necessary for enabling effective search. Text labeling, usually performed manually, plays a crucial role in validating machine-extracted metadata. However, manual labeling is time-consuming; thus, there is an need to develop automated text labeling techniques in order to accelerate the process of scientific innovation. This need is particularly urgent in fields such as environmental genomics and microbiome science, which have historically received less attention in terms of metadata curation and creation of gold-standard text mining datasets.
In this paper, we present two novel automated text labeling approaches for the validation of ML-generated metadata for unlabeled texts, with specific applications in environmental genomics. Our techniques show the potential of two new ways to leverage existing information about the unlabeled texts and the scientific domain. The first technique exploits relationships between different types of data sources related to the same research study, such as publications and proposals. The second technique takes advantage of domain-specific controlled vocabularies or ontologies. In this paper, we detail applying these approaches for ML-generated metadata validation. Our results show that the proposed label assignment approaches can generate both generic and highly-specific text labels for the unlabeled texts, with up to 44% of the labels matching with those suggested by a ML keyword extraction algorithm.
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
MapperGPT: Large Language Models for Linking and Mapping Entities
Authors:
Nicolas Matentzoglu,
J. Harry Caufield,
Harshad B. Hegde,
Justin T. Reese,
Sierra Moxon,
Hyeongsik Kim,
Nomi L. Harris,
Melissa A Haendel,
Christopher J. Mungall
Abstract:
Aligning terminological resources, including ontologies, controlled vocabularies, taxonomies, and value sets is a critical part of data integration in many domains such as healthcare, chemistry, and biomedical research. Entity mapping is the process of determining correspondences between entities across these resources, such as gene identifiers, disease concepts, or chemical entity identifiers. Ma…
▽ More
Aligning terminological resources, including ontologies, controlled vocabularies, taxonomies, and value sets is a critical part of data integration in many domains such as healthcare, chemistry, and biomedical research. Entity mapping is the process of determining correspondences between entities across these resources, such as gene identifiers, disease concepts, or chemical entity identifiers. Many tools have been developed to compute such mappings based on common structural features and lexical information such as labels and synonyms. Lexical approaches in particular often provide very high recall, but low precision, due to lexical ambiguity. As a consequence of this, mapping efforts often resort to a labor intensive manual mapping refinement through a human curator.
Large Language Models (LLMs), such as the ones employed by ChatGPT, have generalizable abilities to perform a wide range of tasks, including question-answering and information extraction. Here we present MapperGPT, an approach that uses LLMs to review and refine mapping relationships as a post-processing step, in concert with existing high-recall methods that are based on lexical and structural heuristics.
We evaluated MapperGPT on a series of alignment tasks from different domains, including anatomy, developmental biology, and renal diseases. We devised a collection of tasks that are designed to be particularly challenging for lexical methods. We show that when used in combination with high-recall methods, MapperGPT can provide a substantial improvement in accuracy, beating state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods such as LogMap.
△ Less
Submitted 5 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
An evaluation of GPT models for phenotype concept recognition
Authors:
Tudor Groza,
Harry Caufield,
Dylan Gration,
Gareth Baynam,
Melissa A Haendel,
Peter N Robinson,
Christopher J Mungall,
Justin T Reese
Abstract:
Objective: Clinical deep phenotyping and phenotype annotation play a critical role in both the diagnosis of patients with rare disorders as well as in building computationally-tractable knowledge in the rare disorders field. These processes rely on using ontology concepts, often from the Human Phenotype Ontology, in conjunction with a phenotype concept recognition task (supported usually by machin…
▽ More
Objective: Clinical deep phenotyping and phenotype annotation play a critical role in both the diagnosis of patients with rare disorders as well as in building computationally-tractable knowledge in the rare disorders field. These processes rely on using ontology concepts, often from the Human Phenotype Ontology, in conjunction with a phenotype concept recognition task (supported usually by machine learning methods) to curate patient profiles or existing scientific literature. With the significant shift in the use of large language models (LLMs) for most NLP tasks, we examine the performance of the latest Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models underpinning ChatGPT as a foundation for the tasks of clinical phenotyping and phenotype annotation. Materials and Methods: The experimental setup of the study included seven prompts of various levels of specificity, two GPT models (gpt-3.5-turbo and gpt-4.0) and two established gold standard corpora for phenotype recognition, one consisting of publication abstracts and the other clinical observations. Results: Our results show that, with an appropriate setup, these models can achieve state of the art performance. The best run, using few-shot learning, achieved 0.58 macro F1 score on publication abstracts and 0.75 macro F1 score on clinical observations, the former being comparable with the state of the art, while the latter surpassing the current best in class tool. Conclusion: While the results are promising, the non-deterministic nature of the outcomes, the high cost and the lack of concordance between different runs using the same prompt and input make the use of these LLMs challenging for this particular task.
△ Less
Submitted 22 November, 2023; v1 submitted 29 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
An Open-Source Knowledge Graph Ecosystem for the Life Sciences
Authors:
Tiffany J. Callahan,
Ignacio J. Tripodi,
Adrianne L. Stefanski,
Luca Cappelletti,
Sanya B. Taneja,
Jordan M. Wyrwa,
Elena Casiraghi,
Nicolas A. Matentzoglu,
Justin Reese,
Jonathan C. Silverstein,
Charles Tapley Hoyt,
Richard D. Boyce,
Scott A. Malec,
Deepak R. Unni,
Marcin P. Joachimiak,
Peter N. Robinson,
Christopher J. Mungall,
Emanuele Cavalleri,
Tommaso Fontana,
Giorgio Valentini,
Marco Mesiti,
Lucas A. Gillenwater,
Brook Santangelo,
Nicole A. Vasilevsky,
Robert Hoehndorf
, et al. (7 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Translational research requires data at multiple scales of biological organization. Advancements in sequencing and multi-omics technologies have increased the availability of these data, but researchers face significant integration challenges. Knowledge graphs (KGs) are used to model complex phenomena, and methods exist to construct them automatically. However, tackling complex biomedical integrat…
▽ More
Translational research requires data at multiple scales of biological organization. Advancements in sequencing and multi-omics technologies have increased the availability of these data, but researchers face significant integration challenges. Knowledge graphs (KGs) are used to model complex phenomena, and methods exist to construct them automatically. However, tackling complex biomedical integration problems requires flexibility in the way knowledge is modeled. Moreover, existing KG construction methods provide robust tooling at the cost of fixed or limited choices among knowledge representation models. PheKnowLator (Phenotype Knowledge Translator) is a semantic ecosystem for automating the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) construction of ontologically grounded KGs with fully customizable knowledge representation. The ecosystem includes KG construction resources (e.g., data preparation APIs), analysis tools (e.g., SPARQL endpoints and abstraction algorithms), and benchmarks (e.g., prebuilt KGs and embeddings). We evaluated the ecosystem by systematically comparing it to existing open-source KG construction methods and by analyzing its computational performance when used to construct 12 large-scale KGs. With flexible knowledge representation, PheKnowLator enables fully customizable KGs without compromising performance or usability.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2024; v1 submitted 11 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Gene Set Summarization using Large Language Models
Authors:
Marcin P. Joachimiak,
J. Harry Caufield,
Nomi L. Harris,
Hyeongsik Kim,
Christopher J. Mungall
Abstract:
Molecular biologists frequently interpret gene lists derived from high-throughput experiments and computational analysis. This is typically done as a statistical enrichment analysis that measures the over- or under-representation of biological function terms associated with genes or their properties, based on curated assertions from a knowledge base (KB) such as the Gene Ontology (GO). Interpretin…
▽ More
Molecular biologists frequently interpret gene lists derived from high-throughput experiments and computational analysis. This is typically done as a statistical enrichment analysis that measures the over- or under-representation of biological function terms associated with genes or their properties, based on curated assertions from a knowledge base (KB) such as the Gene Ontology (GO). Interpreting gene lists can also be framed as a textual summarization task, enabling the use of Large Language Models (LLMs), potentially utilizing scientific texts directly and avoiding reliance on a KB.
We developed SPINDOCTOR (Structured Prompt Interpolation of Natural Language Descriptions of Controlled Terms for Ontology Reporting), a method that uses GPT models to perform gene set function summarization as a complement to standard enrichment analysis. This method can use different sources of gene functional information: (1) structured text derived from curated ontological KB annotations, (2) ontology-free narrative gene summaries, or (3) direct model retrieval.
We demonstrate that these methods are able to generate plausible and biologically valid summary GO term lists for gene sets. However, GPT-based approaches are unable to deliver reliable scores or p-values and often return terms that are not statistically significant. Crucially, these methods were rarely able to recapitulate the most precise and informative term from standard enrichment, likely due to an inability to generalize and reason using an ontology. Results are highly nondeterministic, with minor variations in prompt resulting in radically different term lists. Our results show that at this point, LLM-based methods are unsuitable as a replacement for standard term enrichment analysis and that manual curation of ontological assertions remains necessary.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2024; v1 submitted 20 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Structured prompt interrogation and recursive extraction of semantics (SPIRES): A method for populating knowledge bases using zero-shot learning
Authors:
J. Harry Caufield,
Harshad Hegde,
Vincent Emonet,
Nomi L. Harris,
Marcin P. Joachimiak,
Nicolas Matentzoglu,
HyeongSik Kim,
Sierra A. T. Moxon,
Justin T. Reese,
Melissa A. Haendel,
Peter N. Robinson,
Christopher J. Mungall
Abstract:
Creating knowledge bases and ontologies is a time consuming task that relies on a manual curation. AI/NLP approaches can assist expert curators in populating these knowledge bases, but current approaches rely on extensive training data, and are not able to populate arbitrary complex nested knowledge schemas.
Here we present Structured Prompt Interrogation and Recursive Extraction of Semantics (S…
▽ More
Creating knowledge bases and ontologies is a time consuming task that relies on a manual curation. AI/NLP approaches can assist expert curators in populating these knowledge bases, but current approaches rely on extensive training data, and are not able to populate arbitrary complex nested knowledge schemas.
Here we present Structured Prompt Interrogation and Recursive Extraction of Semantics (SPIRES), a Knowledge Extraction approach that relies on the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform zero-shot learning (ZSL) and general-purpose query answering from flexible prompts and return information conforming to a specified schema. Given a detailed, user-defined knowledge schema and an input text, SPIRES recursively performs prompt interrogation against GPT-3+ to obtain a set of responses matching the provided schema. SPIRES uses existing ontologies and vocabularies to provide identifiers for all matched elements.
We present examples of use of SPIRES in different domains, including extraction of food recipes, multi-species cellular signaling pathways, disease treatments, multi-step drug mechanisms, and chemical to disease causation graphs. Current SPIRES accuracy is comparable to the mid-range of existing Relation Extraction (RE) methods, but has the advantage of easy customization, flexibility, and, crucially, the ability to perform new tasks in the absence of any training data. This method supports a general strategy of leveraging the language interpreting capabilities of LLMs to assemble knowledge bases, assisting manual knowledge curation and acquisition while supporting validation with publicly-available databases and ontologies external to the LLM.
SPIRES is available as part of the open source OntoGPT package: https://github.com/ monarch-initiative/ontogpt.
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 2023; v1 submitted 5 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
KG-Hub -- Building and Exchanging Biological Knowledge Graphs
Authors:
J Harry Caufield,
Tim Putman,
Kevin Schaper,
Deepak R Unni,
Harshad Hegde,
Tiffany J Callahan,
Luca Cappelletti,
Sierra AT Moxon,
Vida Ravanmehr,
Seth Carbon,
Lauren E Chan,
Katherina Cortes,
Kent A Shefchek,
Glass Elsarboukh,
James P Balhoff,
Tommaso Fontana,
Nicolas Matentzoglu,
Richard M Bruskiewich,
Anne E Thessen,
Nomi L Harris,
Monica C Munoz-Torres,
Melissa A Haendel,
Peter N Robinson,
Marcin P Joachimiak,
Christopher J Mungall
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Knowledge graphs (KGs) are a powerful approach for integrating heterogeneous data and making inferences in biology and many other domains, but a coherent solution for constructing, exchanging, and facilitating the downstream use of knowledge graphs is lacking. Here we present KG-Hub, a platform that enables standardized construction, exchange, and reuse of knowledge graphs. Features include a simp…
▽ More
Knowledge graphs (KGs) are a powerful approach for integrating heterogeneous data and making inferences in biology and many other domains, but a coherent solution for constructing, exchanging, and facilitating the downstream use of knowledge graphs is lacking. Here we present KG-Hub, a platform that enables standardized construction, exchange, and reuse of knowledge graphs. Features include a simple, modular extract-transform-load (ETL) pattern for producing graphs compliant with Biolink Model (a high-level data model for standardizing biological data), easy integration of any OBO (Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies) ontology, cached downloads of upstream data sources, versioned and automatically updated builds with stable URLs, web-browsable storage of KG artifacts on cloud infrastructure, and easy reuse of transformed subgraphs across projects. Current KG-Hub projects span use cases including COVID-19 research, drug repurposing, microbial-environmental interactions, and rare disease research. KG-Hub is equipped with tooling to easily analyze and manipulate knowledge graphs. KG-Hub is also tightly integrated with graph machine learning (ML) tools which allow automated graph machine learning, including node embeddings and training of models for link prediction and node classification.
△ Less
Submitted 31 January, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Ontology Development Kit: a toolkit for building, maintaining, and standardising biomedical ontologies
Authors:
Nicolas Matentzoglu,
Damien Goutte-Gattat,
Shawn Zheng Kai Tan,
James P. Balhoff,
Seth Carbon,
Anita R. Caron,
William D. Duncan,
Joe E. Flack,
Melissa Haendel,
Nomi L. Harris,
William R Hogan,
Charles Tapley Hoyt,
Rebecca C. Jackson,
HyeongSik Kim,
Huseyin Kir,
Martin Larralde,
Julie A. McMurry,
James A. Overton,
Bjoern Peters,
Clare Pilgrim,
Ray Stefancsik,
Sofia MC Robb,
Sabrina Toro,
Nicole A Vasilevsky,
Ramona Walls
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Similar to managing software packages, managing the ontology life cycle involves multiple complex workflows such as preparing releases, continuous quality control checking, and dependency management. To manage these processes, a diverse set of tools is required, from command line utilities to powerful ontology engineering environments such as ROBOT. Particularly in the biomedical domain, which has…
▽ More
Similar to managing software packages, managing the ontology life cycle involves multiple complex workflows such as preparing releases, continuous quality control checking, and dependency management. To manage these processes, a diverse set of tools is required, from command line utilities to powerful ontology engineering environments such as ROBOT. Particularly in the biomedical domain, which has developed a set of highly diverse yet inter-dependent ontologies, standardising release practices and metadata, and establishing shared quality standards, are crucial to enable interoperability. The Ontology Development Kit (ODK) provides a set of standardised, customisable, and automatically executable workflows, and packages all required tooling in a single Docker image. In this paper, we provide an overview of how the ODK works, show how it is used in practice, and describe how we envision it driving standardisation efforts in our community.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Biolink Model: A Universal Schema for Knowledge Graphs in Clinical, Biomedical, and Translational Science
Authors:
Deepak R. Unni,
Sierra A. T. Moxon,
Michael Bada,
Matthew Brush,
Richard Bruskiewich,
Paul Clemons,
Vlado Dancik,
Michel Dumontier,
Karamarie Fecho,
Gustavo Glusman,
Jennifer J. Hadlock,
Nomi L. Harris,
Arpita Joshi,
Tim Putman,
Guangrong Qin,
Stephen A. Ramsey,
Kent A. Shefchek,
Harold Solbrig,
Karthik Soman,
Anne T. Thessen,
Melissa A. Haendel,
Chris Bizon,
Christopher J. Mungall,
the Biomedical Data Translator Consortium
Abstract:
Within clinical, biomedical, and translational science, an increasing number of projects are adopting graphs for knowledge representation. Graph-based data models elucidate the interconnectedness between core biomedical concepts, enable data structures to be easily updated, and support intuitive queries, visualizations, and inference algorithms. However, knowledge discovery across these "knowledge…
▽ More
Within clinical, biomedical, and translational science, an increasing number of projects are adopting graphs for knowledge representation. Graph-based data models elucidate the interconnectedness between core biomedical concepts, enable data structures to be easily updated, and support intuitive queries, visualizations, and inference algorithms. However, knowledge discovery across these "knowledge graphs" (KGs) has remained difficult. Data set heterogeneity and complexity; the proliferation of ad hoc data formats; poor compliance with guidelines on findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability; and, in particular, the lack of a universally-accepted, open-access model for standardization across biomedical KGs has left the task of reconciling data sources to downstream consumers. Biolink Model is an open source data model that can be used to formalize the relationships between data structures in translational science. It incorporates object-oriented classification and graph-oriented features. The core of the model is a set of hierarchical, interconnected classes (or categories) and relationships between them (or predicates), representing biomedical entities such as gene, disease, chemical, anatomical structure, and phenotype. The model provides class and edge attributes and associations that guide how entities should relate to one another. Here, we highlight the need for a standardized data model for KGs, describe Biolink Model, and compare it with other models. We demonstrate the utility of Biolink Model in various initiatives, including the Biomedical Data Translator Consortium and the Monarch Initiative, and show how it has supported easier integration and interoperability of biomedical KGs, bringing together knowledge from multiple sources and helping to realize the goals of translational science.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
A Simple Standard for Sharing Ontological Mappings (SSSOM)
Authors:
Nicolas Matentzoglu,
James P. Balhoff,
Susan M. Bello,
Chris Bizon,
Matthew Brush,
Tiffany J. Callahan,
Christopher G Chute,
William D. Duncan,
Chris T. Evelo,
Davera Gabriel,
John Graybeal,
Alasdair Gray,
Benjamin M. Gyori,
Melissa Haendel,
Henriette Harmse,
Nomi L. Harris,
Ian Harrow,
Harshad Hegde,
Amelia L. Hoyt,
Charles T. Hoyt,
Dazhi Jiao,
Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz,
Simon Jupp,
Hyeongsik Kim,
Sebastian Koehler
, et al. (19 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Despite progress in the development of standards for describing and exchanging scientific information, the lack of easy-to-use standards for mapping between different representations of the same or similar objects in different databases poses a major impediment to data integration and interoperability. Mappings often lack the metadata needed to be correctly interpreted and applied. For example, ar…
▽ More
Despite progress in the development of standards for describing and exchanging scientific information, the lack of easy-to-use standards for mapping between different representations of the same or similar objects in different databases poses a major impediment to data integration and interoperability. Mappings often lack the metadata needed to be correctly interpreted and applied. For example, are two terms equivalent or merely related? Are they narrow or broad matches? Are they associated in some other way? Such relationships between the mapped terms are often not documented, leading to incorrect assumptions and making them hard to use in scenarios that require a high degree of precision (such as diagnostics or risk prediction). Also, the lack of descriptions of how mappings were done makes it hard to combine and reconcile mappings, particularly curated and automated ones.
The Simple Standard for Sharing Ontological Mappings (SSSOM) addresses these problems by: 1. Introducing a machine-readable and extensible vocabulary to describe metadata that makes imprecision, inaccuracy and incompleteness in mappings explicit. 2. Defining an easy to use table-based format that can be integrated into existing data science pipelines without the need to parse or query ontologies, and that integrates seamlessly with Linked Data standards. 3. Implementing open and community-driven collaborative workflows designed to evolve the standard continuously to address changing requirements and mapping practices. 4. Providing reference tools and software libraries for working with the standard.
In this paper, we present the SSSOM standard, describe several use cases, and survey some existing work on standardizing the exchange of mappings, with the goal of making mappings Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR). The SSSOM specification is at http://w3id.org/sssom/spec.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
GRAPE for Fast and Scalable Graph Processing and random walk-based Embedding
Authors:
Luca Cappelletti,
Tommaso Fontana,
Elena Casiraghi,
Vida Ravanmehr,
Tiffany J. Callahan,
Carlos Cano,
Marcin P. Joachimiak,
Christopher J. Mungall,
Peter N. Robinson,
Justin Reese,
Giorgio Valentini
Abstract:
Graph Representation Learning (GRL) methods opened new avenues for addressing complex, real-world problems represented by graphs. However, many graphs used in these applications comprise millions of nodes and billions of edges and are beyond the capabilities of current methods and software implementations. We present GRAPE, a software resource for graph processing and embedding that can scale with…
▽ More
Graph Representation Learning (GRL) methods opened new avenues for addressing complex, real-world problems represented by graphs. However, many graphs used in these applications comprise millions of nodes and billions of edges and are beyond the capabilities of current methods and software implementations. We present GRAPE, a software resource for graph processing and embedding that can scale with big graphs by using specialized and smart data structures, algorithms, and a fast parallel implementation of random walk-based methods. Compared with state-of-the-art software resources, GRAPE shows an improvement of orders of magnitude in empirical space and time complexity, as well as a competitive edge and node label prediction performance. GRAPE comprises about 1.7 million well-documented lines of Python and Rust code and provides 69 node embedding methods, 25 inference models, a collection of efficient graph processing utilities and over 80,000 graphs from the literature and other sources. Standardized interfaces allow seamless integration of third-party libraries, while ready-to-use and modular pipelines permit an easy-to-use evaluation of GRL methods, therefore also positioning GRAPE as a software resource to perform a fair comparison between methods and libraries for graph processing and embedding.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2023; v1 submitted 12 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.