-
Data-access performance anti-patterns in data-intensive systems
Authors:
Biruk Asmare Muse,
Kawser Wazed Nafi,
Foutse Khomh,
Giuliano Antoniol
Abstract:
Data-intensive systems handle variable, high volume, and high-velocity data generated by human and digital devices. Like traditional software, data-intensive systems are prone to technical debts introduced to cope-up with the pressure of time and resource constraints on developers. Data-access is a critical component of data-intensive systems as it determines the overall performance and functional…
▽ More
Data-intensive systems handle variable, high volume, and high-velocity data generated by human and digital devices. Like traditional software, data-intensive systems are prone to technical debts introduced to cope-up with the pressure of time and resource constraints on developers. Data-access is a critical component of data-intensive systems as it determines the overall performance and functionality of such systems. While data access technical debts are getting attention from the research community, technical debts affecting the performance, are not well investigated. Objective: Identify, categorize, and validate data access performance issues in the context of NoSQL-based and polyglot persistence data-intensive systems using qualitative study. Method: We collect issues from NoSQL-based and polyglot persistence open-source data-intensive systems and identify data access performance issues using inductive coding and build a taxonomy of the root causes. Then, we validate the perceived relevance of the newly identified performance issues using a developer survey.
△ Less
Submitted 18 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Do Developers Refactor Data Access Code? An Empirical Study
Authors:
Biruk Asmare Muse,
Foutse Khomh,
Giuliano Antoniol
Abstract:
Developers often refactor code to improve the maintainability and comprehension of the software. There are many studies on refactoring activities in traditional software systems. However, refactoring in data-intensive systems is not well explored. Understanding the refactoring practices of developers is important to develop efficient tool support.We conducted a longitudinal study of refactoring ac…
▽ More
Developers often refactor code to improve the maintainability and comprehension of the software. There are many studies on refactoring activities in traditional software systems. However, refactoring in data-intensive systems is not well explored. Understanding the refactoring practices of developers is important to develop efficient tool support.We conducted a longitudinal study of refactoring activities in data access classes using 12 data-intensive subject systems. We investigated the prevalence and evolution of refactorings and the association of refactorings with data access smells. We also conducted a manual analysis of over 378 samples of data access refactoring instances to identify the functionalities of the code that are targeted by such refactorings. Our results show that (1) data access refactorings are prevalent and different in type. \textit{Rename variable} is the most prevalent data access refactoring. (2) The prevalence and type of refactorings vary as systems evolve in time. (3) Most data access refactorings target codes that implement data fetching and insertion. (4) Data access refactorings do not generally touch SQL queries. Overall, the results show that data access refactorings focus on improving the code quality but not the underlying data access operations. Hence, more work is needed from the research community on providing awareness and support to practitioners on the benefits of addressing data access smells with refactorings.
△ Less
Submitted 7 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
On the Prevalence, Impact, and Evolution of SQL Code Smells in Data-Intensive Systems
Authors:
Biruk Asmare Muse,
Mohammad Masudur Rahman,
Csaba Nagy,
Anthony Cleve,
Foutse Khomh,
Giuliano Antoniol
Abstract:
Code smells indicate software design problems that harm software quality. Data-intensive systems that frequently access databases often suffer from SQL code smells besides the traditional smells. While there have been extensive studies on traditional code smells, recently, there has been a growing interest in SQL code smells. In this paper, we conduct an empirical study to investigate the prevalen…
▽ More
Code smells indicate software design problems that harm software quality. Data-intensive systems that frequently access databases often suffer from SQL code smells besides the traditional smells. While there have been extensive studies on traditional code smells, recently, there has been a growing interest in SQL code smells. In this paper, we conduct an empirical study to investigate the prevalence and evolution of SQL code smells in open-source, data-intensive systems. We collected 150 projects and examined both traditional and SQL code smells in these projects. Our investigation delivers several important findings. First, SQL code smells are indeed prevalent in data-intensive software systems. Second, SQL code smells have a weak co-occurrence with traditional code smells. Third, SQL code smells have a weaker association with bugs than that of traditional code smells. Fourth, SQL code smells are more likely to be introduced at the beginning of the project lifetime and likely to be left in the code without a fix, compared to traditional code smells. Overall, our results show that SQL code smells are indeed prevalent and persistent in the studied data-intensive software systems. Developers should be aware of these smells and consider detecting and refactoring SQL code smells and traditional code smells separately, using dedicated tools.
△ Less
Submitted 6 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
FIXME: Synchronize with Database An Empirical Study of Data Access Self-Admitted Technical Debt
Authors:
Biruk Asmare Muse,
Csaba Nagy,
Anthony Cleve,
Foutse Khomh,
Giuliano Antoniol
Abstract:
Developers sometimes choose design and implementation shortcuts due to the pressure from tight release schedules. However, shortcuts introduce technical debt that increases as the software evolves. The debt needs to be repaid as fast as possible to minimize its impact on software development and software quality. Sometimes, technical debt is admitted by developers in comments and commit messages.…
▽ More
Developers sometimes choose design and implementation shortcuts due to the pressure from tight release schedules. However, shortcuts introduce technical debt that increases as the software evolves. The debt needs to be repaid as fast as possible to minimize its impact on software development and software quality. Sometimes, technical debt is admitted by developers in comments and commit messages. Such debt is known as self-admitted technical debt (SATD). In data-intensive systems, where data manipulation is a critical functionality, the presence of SATD in the data access logic could seriously harm performance and maintainability. Understanding the composition and distribution of the SATDs across software systems and their evolution could provide insights into managing technical debt efficiently. We present a large-scale empirical study on the prevalence, composition, and evolution of SATD in data-intensive systems. We analyzed 83 open-source systems relying on relational databases as well as 19 systems relying on NoSQL databases. We detected SATD in source code comments obtained from different snapshots of the subject systems. To understand the evolution dynamics of SATDs, we conducted a survival analysis. Next, we performed a manual analysis of 361 sample data-access SATDs, investigating the composition of data-access SATDs and the reasons behind their introduction and removal. We identified 15 new SATD categories, out of which 11 are specific to database access operations. We found that most of the data-access SATDs are introduced in the later stages of change history rather than at the beginning. We also observed that bug fixing and refactoring are the main reasons behind the introduction of data-access SATDs.
△ Less
Submitted 6 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Clones in Deep Learning Code: What, Where, and Why?
Authors:
Hadhemi Jebnoun,
Md Saidur Rahman,
Foutse Khomh,
Biruk Asmare Muse
Abstract:
Deep Learning applications are becoming increasingly popular. Developers of deep learning systems strive to write more efficient code. Deep learning systems are constantly evolving, imposing tighter development timelines and increasing complexity, which may lead to bad design decisions. A copy-paste approach is widely used among deep learning developers because they rely on common frameworks and d…
▽ More
Deep Learning applications are becoming increasingly popular. Developers of deep learning systems strive to write more efficient code. Deep learning systems are constantly evolving, imposing tighter development timelines and increasing complexity, which may lead to bad design decisions. A copy-paste approach is widely used among deep learning developers because they rely on common frameworks and duplicate similar tasks. Developers often fail to properly propagate changes to all clones fragments during a maintenance activity. To our knowledge, no study has examined code cloning practices in deep learning development. Given the negative impacts of clones on software quality reported in the studies on traditional systems, it is very important to understand the characteristics and potential impacts of code clones on deep learning systems. To this end, we use the NiCad tool to detect clones from 59 Python, 14 C# and 6 Java-based deep learning systems and an equal number of traditional software systems. We then analyze the frequency and distribution of code clones in deep learning and traditional systems. We do further analysis of the distribution of code clones using location-based taxonomy. We also study the correlation between bugs and code clones to assess the impacts of clones on the quality of the studied systems. Finally, we introduce a code clone taxonomy related to deep learning programs and identify the deep learning system development phases in which cloning has the highest risk of faults. Our results show that code cloning is a frequent practice in deep learning systems and that deep learning developers often clone code from files in distant repositories in the system. In addition, we found that code cloning occurs more frequently during DL model construction. And that hyperparameters setting is the phase during which cloning is the riskiest, since it often leads to faults.
△ Less
Submitted 28 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
