Showing 1–12 of 12 results for author: Pabbaraju, C

Credit Attribution and Stable Compression

Authors: Roi Livni, Shay Moran, Kobbi Nissim, Chirag Pabbaraju

Abstract: Credit attribution is crucial across various fields. In academic research, proper citation acknowledges prior work and establishes original contributions. Similarly, in generative models, such as those trained on existing artworks or music, it is important to ensure that any generated content influenced by these works appropriately credits the original creators. We study credit attribution by ma… ▽ More Credit attribution is crucial across various fields. In academic research, proper citation acknowledges prior work and establishes original contributions. Similarly, in generative models, such as those trained on existing artworks or music, it is important to ensure that any generated content influenced by these works appropriately credits the original creators. We study credit attribution by machine learning algorithms. We propose new definitions--relaxations of Differential Privacy--that weaken the stability guarantees for a designated subset of $k$ datapoints. These $k$ datapoints can be used non-stably with permission from their owners, potentially in exchange for compensation. Meanwhile, the remaining datapoints are guaranteed to have no significant influence on the algorithm's output. Our framework extends well-studied notions of stability, including Differential Privacy ($k = 0$), differentially private learning with public data (where the $k$ public datapoints are fixed in advance), and stable sample compression (where the $k$ datapoints are selected adaptively by the algorithm). We examine the expressive power of these stability notions within the PAC learning framework, provide a comprehensive characterization of learnability for algorithms adhering to these principles, and propose directions and questions for future research. △ Less

Submitted 22 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Comments: 15 pages, 1 figure

Quantifying the Gain in Weak-to-Strong Generalization

Authors: Moses Charikar, Chirag Pabbaraju, Kirankumar Shiragur

Abstract: Recent advances in large language models have shown capabilities that are extraordinary and near-superhuman. These models operate with such complexity that reliably evaluating and aligning them proves challenging for humans. This leads to the natural question: can guidance from weak models (like humans) adequately direct the capabilities of strong models? In a recent and somewhat surprising work,… ▽ More Recent advances in large language models have shown capabilities that are extraordinary and near-superhuman. These models operate with such complexity that reliably evaluating and aligning them proves challenging for humans. This leads to the natural question: can guidance from weak models (like humans) adequately direct the capabilities of strong models? In a recent and somewhat surprising work, Burns et al. (2023) empirically demonstrated that when strong models (like GPT-4) are finetuned using labels generated by weak supervisors (like GPT-2), the strong models outperform their weaker counterparts -- a phenomenon they term weak-to-strong generalization. In this work, we present a theoretical framework for understanding weak-to-strong generalization. Specifically, we show that the improvement in performance achieved by strong models over their weaker counterparts is quantified by the misfit error incurred by the strong model on labels generated by the weaker model. Our theory reveals several curious algorithmic insights. For instance, we can predict the amount by which the strong model will improve over the weak model, and also choose among different weak models to train the strong model, based on its misfit error. We validate our theoretical findings through various empirical assessments. △ Less

Submitted 23 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Embedding Probability Distributions into Low Dimensional $\ell_1$: Tree Ising Models via Truncated Metrics

Authors: Moses Charikar, Spencer Compton, Chirag Pabbaraju

Abstract: Given an arbitrary set of high dimensional points in $\ell_1$, there are known negative results that preclude the possibility of always mapping them to a low dimensional $\ell_1$ space while preserving distances with small multiplicative distortion. This is in stark contrast with dimension reduction in Euclidean space ($\ell_2$) where such mappings are always possible. While the first non-trivial… ▽ More Given an arbitrary set of high dimensional points in $\ell_1$, there are known negative results that preclude the possibility of always mapping them to a low dimensional $\ell_1$ space while preserving distances with small multiplicative distortion. This is in stark contrast with dimension reduction in Euclidean space ($\ell_2$) where such mappings are always possible. While the first non-trivial lower bounds for $\ell_1$ dimension reduction were established almost 20 years ago, there has been limited progress in understanding what sets of points in $\ell_1$ are conducive to a low-dimensional mapping. In this work, we study a new characterization of $\ell_1$ metrics that are conducive to dimension reduction in $\ell_1$. Our characterization focuses on metrics that are defined by the disagreement of binary variables over a probability distribution -- any $\ell_1$ metric can be represented in this form. We show that, for configurations of $n$ points in $\ell_1$ obtained from tree Ising models, we can reduce dimension to $\mathrm{polylog}(n)$ with constant distortion. In doing so, we develop technical tools for embedding truncated metrics which have been studied because of their applications in computer vision, and are objects of independent interest in metric geometry. Among other tools, we show how any $\ell_1$ metric can be truncated with $O(1)$ distortion and $O(\log(n))$ blowup in dimension. △ Less

Submitted 5 April, 2024; v1 submitted 4 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Testing with Non-identically Distributed Samples

Authors: Shivam Garg, Chirag Pabbaraju, Kirankumar Shiragur, Gregory Valiant

Abstract: We examine the extent to which sublinear-sample property testing and estimation applies to settings where samples are independently but not identically distributed. Specifically, we consider the following distributional property testing framework: Suppose there is a set of distributions over a discrete support of size $k$, $\textbf{p}_1, \textbf{p}_2,\ldots,\textbf{p}_T$, and we obtain $c$ indepen… ▽ More We examine the extent to which sublinear-sample property testing and estimation applies to settings where samples are independently but not identically distributed. Specifically, we consider the following distributional property testing framework: Suppose there is a set of distributions over a discrete support of size $k$, $\textbf{p}_1, \textbf{p}_2,\ldots,\textbf{p}_T$, and we obtain $c$ independent draws from each distribution. Suppose the goal is to learn or test a property of the average distribution, $\textbf{p}_{\mathrm{avg}}$. This setup models a number of important practical settings where the individual distributions correspond to heterogeneous entities -- either individuals, chronologically distinct time periods, spatially separated data sources, etc. From a learning standpoint, even with $c=1$ samples from each distribution, $Θ(k/\varepsilon^2)$ samples are necessary and sufficient to learn $\textbf{p}_{\mathrm{avg}}$ to within error $\varepsilon$ in TV distance. To test uniformity or identity -- distinguishing the case that $\textbf{p}_{\mathrm{avg}}$ is equal to some reference distribution, versus has $\ell_1$ distance at least $\varepsilon$ from the reference distribution, we show that a linear number of samples in $k$ is necessary given $c=1$ samples from each distribution. In contrast, for $c \ge 2$, we recover the usual sublinear sample testing of the i.i.d. setting: we show that $O(\sqrt{k}/\varepsilon^2 + 1/\varepsilon^4)$ samples are sufficient, matching the optimal sample complexity in the i.i.d. case in the regime where $\varepsilon \ge k^{-1/4}$. Additionally, we show that in the $c=2$ case, there is a constant $ρ> 0$ such that even in the linear regime with $ρk$ samples, no tester that considers the multiset of samples (ignoring which samples were drawn from the same $\textbf{p}_i$) can perform uniformity testing. △ Less

Submitted 18 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Harnessing the Power of Choices in Decision Tree Learning

Authors: Guy Blanc, Jane Lange, Chirag Pabbaraju, Colin Sullivan, Li-Yang Tan, Mo Tiwari

Abstract: We propose a simple generalization of standard and empirically successful decision tree learning algorithms such as ID3, C4.5, and CART. These algorithms, which have been central to machine learning for decades, are greedy in nature: they grow a decision tree by iteratively splitting on the best attribute. Our algorithm, Top-$k$, considers the $k$ best attributes as possible splits instead of just… ▽ More We propose a simple generalization of standard and empirically successful decision tree learning algorithms such as ID3, C4.5, and CART. These algorithms, which have been central to machine learning for decades, are greedy in nature: they grow a decision tree by iteratively splitting on the best attribute. Our algorithm, Top-$k$, considers the $k$ best attributes as possible splits instead of just the single best attribute. We demonstrate, theoretically and empirically, the power of this simple generalization. We first prove a {\sl greediness hierarchy theorem} showing that for every $k \in \mathbb{N}$, Top-$(k+1)$ can be dramatically more powerful than Top-$k$: there are data distributions for which the former achieves accuracy $1-\varepsilon$, whereas the latter only achieves accuracy $\frac1{2}+\varepsilon$. We then show, through extensive experiments, that Top-$k$ outperforms the two main approaches to decision tree learning: classic greedy algorithms and more recent "optimal decision tree" algorithms. On one hand, Top-$k$ consistently enjoys significant accuracy gains over greedy algorithms across a wide range of benchmarks. On the other hand, Top-$k$ is markedly more scalable than optimal decision tree algorithms and is able to handle dataset and feature set sizes that remain far beyond the reach of these algorithms. △ Less

Submitted 25 October, 2023; v1 submitted 2 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: NeurIPS 2023

ACM Class: I.2.0; I.2.m

Multiclass Learnability Does Not Imply Sample Compression

Authors: Chirag Pabbaraju

Abstract: A hypothesis class admits a sample compression scheme, if for every sample labeled by a hypothesis from the class, it is possible to retain only a small subsample, using which the labels on the entire sample can be inferred. The size of the compression scheme is an upper bound on the size of the subsample produced. Every learnable binary hypothesis class (which must necessarily have finite VC dime… ▽ More A hypothesis class admits a sample compression scheme, if for every sample labeled by a hypothesis from the class, it is possible to retain only a small subsample, using which the labels on the entire sample can be inferred. The size of the compression scheme is an upper bound on the size of the subsample produced. Every learnable binary hypothesis class (which must necessarily have finite VC dimension) admits a sample compression scheme of size only a finite function of its VC dimension, independent of the sample size. For multiclass hypothesis classes, the analog of VC dimension is the DS dimension. We show that the analogous statement pertaining to sample compression is not true for multiclass hypothesis classes: every learnable multiclass hypothesis class, which must necessarily have finite DS dimension, does not admit a sample compression scheme of size only a finite function of its DS dimension. △ Less

Submitted 20 September, 2023; v1 submitted 11 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Provable benefits of score matching

Authors: Chirag Pabbaraju, Dhruv Rohatgi, Anish Sevekari, Holden Lee, Ankur Moitra, Andrej Risteski

Abstract: Score matching is an alternative to maximum likelihood (ML) for estimating a probability distribution parametrized up to a constant of proportionality. By fitting the ''score'' of the distribution, it sidesteps the need to compute this constant of proportionality (which is often intractable). While score matching and variants thereof are popular in practice, precise theoretical understanding of th… ▽ More Score matching is an alternative to maximum likelihood (ML) for estimating a probability distribution parametrized up to a constant of proportionality. By fitting the ''score'' of the distribution, it sidesteps the need to compute this constant of proportionality (which is often intractable). While score matching and variants thereof are popular in practice, precise theoretical understanding of the benefits and tradeoffs with maximum likelihood -- both computational and statistical -- are not well understood. In this work, we give the first example of a natural exponential family of distributions such that the score matching loss is computationally efficient to optimize, and has a comparable statistical efficiency to ML, while the ML loss is intractable to optimize using a gradient-based method. The family consists of exponentials of polynomials of fixed degree, and our result can be viewed as a continuous analogue of recent developments in the discrete setting. Precisely, we show: (1) Designing a zeroth-order or first-order oracle for optimizing the maximum likelihood loss is NP-hard. (2) Maximum likelihood has a statistical efficiency polynomial in the ambient dimension and the radius of the parameters of the family. (3) Minimizing the score matching loss is both computationally and statistically efficient, with complexity polynomial in the ambient dimension. △ Less

Submitted 2 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: 25 Pages

A Characterization of List Learnability

Authors: Moses Charikar, Chirag Pabbaraju

Abstract: A classical result in learning theory shows the equivalence of PAC learnability of binary hypothesis classes and the finiteness of VC dimension. Extending this to the multiclass setting was an open problem, which was settled in a recent breakthrough result characterizing multiclass PAC learnability via the DS dimension introduced earlier by Daniely and Shalev-Shwartz. In this work we consider list… ▽ More A classical result in learning theory shows the equivalence of PAC learnability of binary hypothesis classes and the finiteness of VC dimension. Extending this to the multiclass setting was an open problem, which was settled in a recent breakthrough result characterizing multiclass PAC learnability via the DS dimension introduced earlier by Daniely and Shalev-Shwartz. In this work we consider list PAC learning where the goal is to output a list of $k$ predictions. List learning algorithms have been developed in several settings before and indeed, list learning played an important role in the recent characterization of multiclass learnability. In this work we ask: when is it possible to $k$-list learn a hypothesis class? We completely characterize $k$-list learnability in terms of a generalization of DS dimension that we call the $k$-DS dimension. Generalizing the recent characterization of multiclass learnability, we show that a hypothesis class is $k$-list learnable if and only if the $k$-DS dimension is finite. △ Less

Submitted 26 March, 2023; v1 submitted 7 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Pitfalls of Gaussians as a noise distribution in NCE

Authors: Holden Lee, Chirag Pabbaraju, Anish Sevekari, Andrej Risteski

Abstract: Noise Contrastive Estimation (NCE) is a popular approach for learning probability density functions parameterized up to a constant of proportionality. The main idea is to design a classification problem for distinguishing training data from samples from an easy-to-sample noise distribution $q$, in a manner that avoids having to calculate a partition function. It is well-known that the choice of… ▽ More Noise Contrastive Estimation (NCE) is a popular approach for learning probability density functions parameterized up to a constant of proportionality. The main idea is to design a classification problem for distinguishing training data from samples from an easy-to-sample noise distribution $q$, in a manner that avoids having to calculate a partition function. It is well-known that the choice of $q$ can severely impact the computational and statistical efficiency of NCE. In practice, a common choice for $q$ is a Gaussian which matches the mean and covariance of the data. In this paper, we show that such a choice can result in an exponentially bad (in the ambient dimension) conditioning of the Hessian of the loss, even for very simple data distributions. As a consequence, both the statistical and algorithmic complexity for such a choice of $q$ will be problematic in practice, suggesting that more complex noise distributions are essential to the success of NCE. △ Less

Submitted 2 March, 2023; v1 submitted 1 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Comments: 14 pages, 1 figure

Universal Approximation for Log-concave Distributions using Well-conditioned Normalizing Flows

Authors: Holden Lee, Chirag Pabbaraju, Anish Sevekari, Andrej Risteski

Abstract: Normalizing flows are a widely used class of latent-variable generative models with a tractable likelihood. Affine-coupling (Dinh et al, 2014-16) models are a particularly common type of normalizing flows, for which the Jacobian of the latent-to-observable-variable transformation is triangular, allowing the likelihood to be computed in linear time. Despite the widespread usage of affine couplings,… ▽ More Normalizing flows are a widely used class of latent-variable generative models with a tractable likelihood. Affine-coupling (Dinh et al, 2014-16) models are a particularly common type of normalizing flows, for which the Jacobian of the latent-to-observable-variable transformation is triangular, allowing the likelihood to be computed in linear time. Despite the widespread usage of affine couplings, the special structure of the architecture makes understanding their representational power challenging. The question of universal approximation was only recently resolved by three parallel papers (Huang et al.,2020;Zhang et al.,2020;Koehler et al.,2020) -- who showed reasonably regular distributions can be approximated arbitrarily well using affine couplings -- albeit with networks with a nearly-singular Jacobian. As ill-conditioned Jacobians are an obstacle for likelihood-based training, the fundamental question remains: which distributions can be approximated using well-conditioned affine coupling flows? In this paper, we show that any log-concave distribution can be approximated using well-conditioned affine-coupling flows. In terms of proof techniques, we uncover and leverage deep connections between affine coupling architectures, underdamped Langevin dynamics (a stochastic differential equation often used to sample from Gibbs measures) and Hénon maps (a structured dynamical system that appears in the study of symplectic diffeomorphisms). Our results also inform the practice of training affine couplings: we approximate a padded version of the input distribution with iid Gaussians -- a strategy which Koehler et al.(2020) empirically observed to result in better-conditioned flows, but had hitherto no theoretical grounding. Our proof can thus be seen as providing theoretical evidence for the benefits of Gaussian padding when training normalizing flows. △ Less

Submitted 6 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Comments: 40 pages, 0 figures

Efficient semidefinite-programming-based inference for binary and multi-class MRFs

Authors: Chirag Pabbaraju, Po-Wei Wang, J. Zico Kolter

Abstract: Probabilistic inference in pairwise Markov Random Fields (MRFs), i.e. computing the partition function or computing a MAP estimate of the variables, is a foundational problem in probabilistic graphical models. Semidefinite programming relaxations have long been a theoretically powerful tool for analyzing properties of probabilistic inference, but have not been practical owing to the high computati… ▽ More Probabilistic inference in pairwise Markov Random Fields (MRFs), i.e. computing the partition function or computing a MAP estimate of the variables, is a foundational problem in probabilistic graphical models. Semidefinite programming relaxations have long been a theoretically powerful tool for analyzing properties of probabilistic inference, but have not been practical owing to the high computational cost of typical solvers for solving the resulting SDPs. In this paper, we propose an efficient method for computing the partition function or MAP estimate in a pairwise MRF by instead exploiting a recently proposed coordinate-descent-based fast semidefinite solver. We also extend semidefinite relaxations from the typical binary MRF to the full multi-class setting, and develop a compact semidefinite relaxation that can again be solved efficiently using the solver. We show that the method substantially outperforms (both in terms of solution quality and speed) the existing state of the art in approximate inference, on benchmark problems drawn from previous work. We also show that our approach can scale to large MRF domains such as fully-connected pairwise CRF models used in computer vision. △ Less

Submitted 30 April, 2021; v1 submitted 4 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: Accepted at NeurIPS'20. The code can be found at https://github.com/locuslab/sdp_mrf

Learning Functions over Sets via Permutation Adversarial Networks

Authors: Chirag Pabbaraju, Prateek Jain

Abstract: In this paper, we consider the problem of learning functions over sets, i.e., functions that are invariant to permutations of input set items. Recent approaches of pooling individual element embeddings can necessitate extremely large embedding sizes for challenging functions. We address this challenge by allowing standard neural networks like LSTMs to succinctly capture the function over the set.… ▽ More In this paper, we consider the problem of learning functions over sets, i.e., functions that are invariant to permutations of input set items. Recent approaches of pooling individual element embeddings can necessitate extremely large embedding sizes for challenging functions. We address this challenge by allowing standard neural networks like LSTMs to succinctly capture the function over the set. However, to ensure invariance with respect to permutations of set elements, we propose a novel architecture called SPAN that simultaneously learns the function as well as adversarial or worst-case permutations for each input set. The learning problem reduces to a min-max optimization problem that is solved via a simple alternating block coordinate descent technique. We conduct extensive experiments on a variety of set-learning tasks and demonstrate that SPAN learns nearly permutation-invariant functions while still ensuring accuracy on test data. On a variety of tasks sampled from the domains of statistics, graph functions and linear algebra, we show that our method can significantly outperform state-of-the-art methods such as DeepSets and Janossy Pooling. Finally, we present a case study of how learning set-functions can help extract powerful features for recommendation systems, and show that such a method can be as much as 2% more accurate than carefully hand-tuned features on a real-world recommendation system. △ Less

Submitted 10 January, 2020; v1 submitted 12 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.