Tree-of-Mixed-Thought: Combining Fast and Slow Thinking for Multi-hop Visual Reasoning
Authors:
Pengbo Hu,
Ji Qi,
Xingyu Li,
Hong Li,
Xinqi Wang,
Bing Quan,
Ruiyu Wang,
Yi Zhou
Abstract:
There emerges a promising trend of using large language models (LLMs) to generate code-like plans for complex inference tasks such as visual reasoning. This paradigm, known as LLM-based planning, provides flexibility in problem solving and endows better interpretability. However, current research is mostly limited to basic scenarios of simple questions that can be straightforward answered in a few…
▽ More
There emerges a promising trend of using large language models (LLMs) to generate code-like plans for complex inference tasks such as visual reasoning. This paradigm, known as LLM-based planning, provides flexibility in problem solving and endows better interpretability. However, current research is mostly limited to basic scenarios of simple questions that can be straightforward answered in a few inference steps. Planning for the more challenging multi-hop visual reasoning tasks remains under-explored. Specifically, under multi-hop reasoning situations, the trade-off between accuracy and the complexity of plan-searching becomes prominent. The prevailing algorithms either address the efficiency issue by employing the fast one-stop generation or adopt a complex iterative generation method to improve accuracy. Both fail to balance the need for efficiency and performance. Drawing inspiration from the dual system of cognition in the human brain, the fast and the slow think processes, we propose a hierarchical plan-searching algorithm that integrates the one-stop reasoning (fast) and the Tree-of-thought (slow). Our approach succeeds in performance while significantly saving inference steps. Moreover, we repurpose the PTR and the CLEVER datasets, developing a systematic framework for evaluating the performance and efficiency of LLMs-based plan-search algorithms under reasoning tasks at different levels of difficulty. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of our proposed algorithm in terms of performance and efficiency. The dataset and code will be release soon.
△ Less
Submitted 20 August, 2023; v1 submitted 18 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
A Summary of the ALQAC 2021 Competition
Authors:
Nguyen Ha Thanh,
Bui Minh Quan,
Chau Nguyen,
Tung Le,
Nguyen Minh Phuong,
Dang Tran Binh,
Vuong Thi Hai Yen,
Teeradaj Racharak,
Nguyen Le Minh,
Tran Duc Vu,
Phan Viet Anh,
Nguyen Truong Son,
Huy Tien Nguyen,
Bhumindr Butr-indr,
Peerapon Vateekul,
Prachya Boonkwan
Abstract:
We summarize the evaluation of the first Automated Legal Question Answering Competition (ALQAC 2021). The competition this year contains three tasks, which aims at processing the statute law document, which are Legal Text Information Retrieval (Task 1), Legal Text Entailment Prediction (Task 2), and Legal Text Question Answering (Task 3). The final goal of these tasks is to build a system that can…
▽ More
We summarize the evaluation of the first Automated Legal Question Answering Competition (ALQAC 2021). The competition this year contains three tasks, which aims at processing the statute law document, which are Legal Text Information Retrieval (Task 1), Legal Text Entailment Prediction (Task 2), and Legal Text Question Answering (Task 3). The final goal of these tasks is to build a system that can automatically determine whether a particular statement is lawful. There is no limit to the approaches of the participating teams. This year, there are 5 teams participating in Task 1, 6 teams participating in Task 2, and 5 teams participating in Task 3. There are in total 36 runs submitted to the organizer. In this paper, we summarize each team's approaches, official results, and some discussion about the competition. Only results of the teams who successfully submit their approach description paper are reported in this paper.
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2022; v1 submitted 22 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
