-
Fast Linear Model Trees by PILOT
Authors:
Jakob Raymaekers,
Peter J. Rousseeuw,
Tim Verdonck,
Ruicong Yao
Abstract:
Linear model trees are regression trees that incorporate linear models in the leaf nodes. This preserves the intuitive interpretation of decision trees and at the same time enables them to better capture linear relationships, which is hard for standard decision trees. But most existing methods for fitting linear model trees are time consuming and therefore not scalable to large data sets. In addit…
▽ More
Linear model trees are regression trees that incorporate linear models in the leaf nodes. This preserves the intuitive interpretation of decision trees and at the same time enables them to better capture linear relationships, which is hard for standard decision trees. But most existing methods for fitting linear model trees are time consuming and therefore not scalable to large data sets. In addition, they are more prone to overfitting and extrapolation issues than standard regression trees. In this paper we introduce PILOT, a new algorithm for linear model trees that is fast, regularized, stable and interpretable. PILOT trains in a greedy fashion like classic regression trees, but incorporates an $L^2$ boosting approach and a model selection rule for fitting linear models in the nodes. The abbreviation PILOT stands for $PI$ecewise $L$inear $O$rganic $T$ree, where `organic' refers to the fact that no pruning is carried out. PILOT has the same low time and space complexity as CART without its pruning. An empirical study indicates that PILOT tends to outperform standard decision trees and other linear model trees on a variety of data sets. Moreover, we prove its consistency in an additive model setting under weak assumptions. When the data is generated by a linear model, the convergence rate is polynomial.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Silhouettes and quasi residual plots for neural nets and tree-based classifiers
Authors:
Jakob Raymaekers,
Peter J. Rousseeuw
Abstract:
Classification by neural nets and by tree-based methods are powerful tools of machine learning. There exist interesting visualizations of the inner workings of these and other classifiers. Here we pursue a different goal, which is to visualize the cases being classified, either in training data or in test data. An important aspect is whether a case has been classified to its given class (label) or…
▽ More
Classification by neural nets and by tree-based methods are powerful tools of machine learning. There exist interesting visualizations of the inner workings of these and other classifiers. Here we pursue a different goal, which is to visualize the cases being classified, either in training data or in test data. An important aspect is whether a case has been classified to its given class (label) or whether the classifier wants to assign it to different class. This is reflected in the (conditional and posterior) probability of the alternative class (PAC). A high PAC indicates label bias, i.e. the possibility that the case was mislabeled. The PAC is used to construct a silhouette plot which is similar in spirit to the silhouette plot for cluster analysis (Rousseeuw, 1987). The average silhouette width can be used to compare different classifications of the same dataset. We will also draw quasi residual plots of the PAC versus a data feature, which may lead to more insight in the data. One of these data features is how far each case lies from its given class. The graphical displays are illustrated and interpreted on benchmark data sets containing images, mixed features, and tweets.
△ Less
Submitted 26 February, 2022; v1 submitted 16 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Weight-of-evidence 2.0 with shrinkage and spline-binning
Authors:
Jakob Raymaekers,
Wouter Verbeke,
Tim Verdonck
Abstract:
In many practical applications, such as fraud detection, credit risk modeling or medical decision making, classification models for assigning instances to a predefined set of classes are required to be both precise as well as interpretable. Linear modeling methods such as logistic regression are often adopted, since they offer an acceptable balance between precision and interpretability. Linear me…
▽ More
In many practical applications, such as fraud detection, credit risk modeling or medical decision making, classification models for assigning instances to a predefined set of classes are required to be both precise as well as interpretable. Linear modeling methods such as logistic regression are often adopted, since they offer an acceptable balance between precision and interpretability. Linear methods, however, are not well equipped to handle categorical predictors with high-cardinality or to exploit non-linear relations in the data. As a solution, data preprocessing methods such as weight-of-evidence are typically used for transforming the predictors. The binning procedure that underlies the weight-of-evidence approach, however, has been little researched and typically relies on ad-hoc or expert driven procedures. The objective in this paper, therefore, is to propose a formalized, data-driven and powerful method.
To this end, we explore the discretization of continuous variables through the binning of spline functions, which allows for capturing non-linear effects in the predictor variables and yields highly interpretable predictors taking only a small number of discrete values. Moreover, we extend upon the weight-of-evidence approach and propose to estimate the proportions using shrinkage estimators. Together, this offers an improved ability to exploit both non-linear and categorical predictors for achieving increased classification precision, while maintaining interpretability of the resulting model and decreasing the risk of overfitting.
We present the results of a series of experiments in a fraud detection setting, which illustrate the effectiveness of the presented approach. We facilitate reproduction of the presented results and adoption of the proposed approaches by providing both the dataset and the code for implementing the experiments and the presented approach.
△ Less
Submitted 24 September, 2021; v1 submitted 5 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Regularized K-means through hard-thresholding
Authors:
Jakob Raymaekers,
Ruben H. Zamar
Abstract:
We study a framework of regularized $K$-means methods based on direct penalization of the size of the cluster centers. Different penalization strategies are considered and compared through simulation and theoretical analysis. Based on the results, we propose HT $K$-means, which uses an $\ell_0$ penalty to induce sparsity in the variables. Different techniques for selecting the tuning parameter are…
▽ More
We study a framework of regularized $K$-means methods based on direct penalization of the size of the cluster centers. Different penalization strategies are considered and compared through simulation and theoretical analysis. Based on the results, we propose HT $K$-means, which uses an $\ell_0$ penalty to induce sparsity in the variables. Different techniques for selecting the tuning parameter are discussed and compared. The proposed method stacks up favorably with the most popular regularized $K$-means methods in an extensive simulation study. Finally, HT $K$-means is applied to several real data examples. Graphical displays are presented and used in these examples to gain more insight into the datasets.
△ Less
Submitted 2 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
Class maps for visualizing classification results
Authors:
Jakob Raymaekers,
Peter J. Rousseeuw,
Mia Hubert
Abstract:
Classification is a major tool of statistics and machine learning. A classification method first processes a training set of objects with given classes (labels), with the goal of afterward assigning new objects to one of these classes. When running the resulting prediction method on the training data or on test data, it can happen that an object is predicted to lie in a class that differs from its…
▽ More
Classification is a major tool of statistics and machine learning. A classification method first processes a training set of objects with given classes (labels), with the goal of afterward assigning new objects to one of these classes. When running the resulting prediction method on the training data or on test data, it can happen that an object is predicted to lie in a class that differs from its given label. This is sometimes called label bias, and raises the question whether the object was mislabeled. The proposed class map reflects the probability that an object belongs to an alternative class, how far it is from the other objects in its given class, and whether some objects lie far from all classes. The goal is to visualize aspects of the classification results to obtain insight in the data. The display is constructed for discriminant analysis, the k-nearest neighbor classifier, support vector machines, logistic regression, and coupling pairwise classifications. It is illustrated on several benchmark datasets, including some about images and texts.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2021; v1 submitted 28 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Transforming variables to central normality
Authors:
Jakob Raymaekers,
Peter J. Rousseeuw
Abstract:
Many real data sets contain numerical features (variables) whose distribution is far from normal (gaussian). Instead, their distribution is often skewed. In order to handle such data it is customary to preprocess the variables to make them more normal. The Box-Cox and Yeo-Johnson transformations are well-known tools for this. However, the standard maximum likelihood estimator of their transformati…
▽ More
Many real data sets contain numerical features (variables) whose distribution is far from normal (gaussian). Instead, their distribution is often skewed. In order to handle such data it is customary to preprocess the variables to make them more normal. The Box-Cox and Yeo-Johnson transformations are well-known tools for this. However, the standard maximum likelihood estimator of their transformation parameter is highly sensitive to outliers, and will often try to move outliers inward at the expense of the normality of the central part of the data. We propose a modification of these transformations as well as an estimator of the transformation parameter that is robust to outliers, so the transformed data can be approximately normal in the center and a few outliers may deviate from it. It compares favorably to existing techniques in an extensive simulation study and on real data.
△ Less
Submitted 21 November, 2020; v1 submitted 16 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
