Showing 1–11 of 11 results for author: Ryant, N

Improved POS tagging for spontaneous, clinical speech using data augmentation

Authors: Seth Kulick, Neville Ryant, David J. Irwin, Naomi Nevler, Sunghye Cho

Abstract: This paper addresses the problem of improving POS tagging of transcripts of speech from clinical populations. In contrast to prior work on parsing and POS tagging of transcribed speech, we do not make use of an in domain treebank for training. Instead, we train on an out of domain treebank of newswire using data augmentation techniques to make these structures resemble natural, spontaneous speech.… ▽ More This paper addresses the problem of improving POS tagging of transcripts of speech from clinical populations. In contrast to prior work on parsing and POS tagging of transcribed speech, we do not make use of an in domain treebank for training. Instead, we train on an out of domain treebank of newswire using data augmentation techniques to make these structures resemble natural, spontaneous speech. We trained a parser with and without the augmented data and tested its performance using manually validated POS tags in clinical speech produced by patients with various types of neurodegenerative conditions. △ Less

Submitted 11 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Inferring Pitch from Coarse Spectral Features

Authors: Danni Ma, Neville Ryant, Mark Liberman

Abstract: Fundamental frequency (F0) has long been treated as the physical definition of "pitch" in phonetic analysis. But there have been many demonstrations that F0 is at best an approximation to pitch, both in production and in perception: pitch is not F0, and F0 is not pitch. Changes in the pitch involve many articulatory and acoustic covariates; pitch perception often deviates from what F0 analysis pre… ▽ More Fundamental frequency (F0) has long been treated as the physical definition of "pitch" in phonetic analysis. But there have been many demonstrations that F0 is at best an approximation to pitch, both in production and in perception: pitch is not F0, and F0 is not pitch. Changes in the pitch involve many articulatory and acoustic covariates; pitch perception often deviates from what F0 analysis predicts; and in fact, quasi-periodic signals from a single voice source are often incompletely characterized by an attempt to define a single time-varying F0. In this paper, we find strong support for the existence of covariates for pitch in aspects of relatively coarse spectra, in which an overtone series is not available. Thus linear regression can predict the pitch of simple vocalizations, produced by an articulatory synthesizer or by human, from single frames of such coarse spectra. Across speakers, and in more complex vocalizations, our experiments indicate that the covariates are not quite so simple, though apparently still available for more sophisticated modeling. On this basis, we propose that the field needs a better way of thinking about speech pitch, just as celestial mechanics requires us to go beyond Newton's point mass approximations to heavenly bodies. △ Less

Submitted 26 August, 2022; v1 submitted 9 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

A Part-of-Speech Tagger for Yiddish

Authors: Seth Kulick, Neville Ryant, Beatrice Santorini, Joel Wallenberg, Assaf Urieli

Abstract: We describe the construction and evaluation of a part-of-speech tagger for Yiddish. This is the first step in a larger project of automatically assigning part-of-speech tags and syntactic structure to Yiddish text for purposes of linguistic research. We combine two resources for the current work - an 80K-word subset of the Penn Parsed Corpus of Historical Yiddish (PPCHY) and 650 million words of O… ▽ More We describe the construction and evaluation of a part-of-speech tagger for Yiddish. This is the first step in a larger project of automatically assigning part-of-speech tags and syntactic structure to Yiddish text for purposes of linguistic research. We combine two resources for the current work - an 80K-word subset of the Penn Parsed Corpus of Historical Yiddish (PPCHY) and 650 million words of OCR'd Yiddish text from the Yiddish Book Center (YBC). Yiddish orthography in the YBC corpus has many spelling inconsistencies, and we present some evidence that even simple non-contextualized embeddings trained on YBC are able to capture the relationships among spelling variants without the need to first "standardize" the corpus. We also use YBC for continued pretraining of contexualized embeddings, which are then integrated into a tagger model trained and evaluated on the PPCHY. We evaluate the tagger performance on a 10-fold cross-validation split, showing that the use of the YBC text for the contextualized embeddings improves tagger performance. We conclude by discussing some next steps, including the need for additional annotated training and test data. △ Less

Submitted 18 August, 2023; v1 submitted 3 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English: First Parsing Results and Analysis

Authors: Seth Kulick, Neville Ryant, Beatrice Santorini

Abstract: We present the first parsing results on the Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME), a 1.9 million word treebank that is an important resource for research in syntactic change. We describe key features of PPCEME that make it challenging for parsing, including a larger and more varied set of function tags than in the Penn Treebank. We present results for this corpus using a mod… ▽ More We present the first parsing results on the Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME), a 1.9 million word treebank that is an important resource for research in syntactic change. We describe key features of PPCEME that make it challenging for parsing, including a larger and more varied set of function tags than in the Penn Treebank. We present results for this corpus using a modified version of the Berkeley Neural Parser and the approach to function tag recovery of Gabbard et al (2006). Despite its simplicity, this approach works surprisingly well, suggesting it is possible to recover the original structure with sufficient accuracy to support linguistic applications (e.g., searching for syntactic structures of interest). However, for a subset of function tags (e.g., the tag indicating direct speech), additional work is needed, and we discuss some further limits of this approach. The resulting parser will be used to parse Early English Books Online, a 1.1 billion word corpus whose utility for the study of syntactic change will be greatly increased with the addition of accurate parse trees. △ Less

Submitted 15 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Automatic recognition of suprasegmentals in speech

Authors: Jiahong Yuan, Neville Ryant, Xingyu Cai, Kenneth Church, Mark Liberman

Abstract: This study reports our efforts to improve automatic recognition of suprasegmentals by fine-tuning wav2vec 2.0 with CTC, a method that has been successful in automatic speech recognition. We demonstrate that the method can improve the state-of-the-art on automatic recognition of syllables, tones, and pitch accents. Utilizing segmental information, by employing tonal finals or tonal syllables as rec… ▽ More This study reports our efforts to improve automatic recognition of suprasegmentals by fine-tuning wav2vec 2.0 with CTC, a method that has been successful in automatic speech recognition. We demonstrate that the method can improve the state-of-the-art on automatic recognition of syllables, tones, and pitch accents. Utilizing segmental information, by employing tonal finals or tonal syllables as recognition units, can significantly improve Mandarin tone recognition. Language models are helpful when tonal syllables are used as recognition units, but not helpful when tones are recognition units. Finally, Mandarin tone recognition can benefit from English phoneme recognition by combining the two tasks in fine-tuning wav2vec 2.0. △ Less

Submitted 3 August, 2021; v1 submitted 2 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

Comments: submitted to ASRU 2021

The Third DIHARD Diarization Challenge

Authors: Neville Ryant, Prachi Singh, Venkat Krishnamohan, Rajat Varma, Kenneth Church, Christopher Cieri, Jun Du, Sriram Ganapathy, Mark Liberman

Abstract: DIHARD III was the third in a series of speaker diarization challenges intended to improve the robustness of diarization systems to variability in recording equipment, noise conditions, and conversational domain. Speaker diarization was evaluated under two speech activity conditions (diarization from a reference speech activity vs. diarization from scratch) and 11 diverse domains. The domains span… ▽ More DIHARD III was the third in a series of speaker diarization challenges intended to improve the robustness of diarization systems to variability in recording equipment, noise conditions, and conversational domain. Speaker diarization was evaluated under two speech activity conditions (diarization from a reference speech activity vs. diarization from scratch) and 11 diverse domains. The domains span a range of recording conditions and interaction types, including read audio-books, meeting speech, clinical interviews, web videos, and, for the first time, conversational telephone speech. A total of 30 organizations (forming 21teams) from industry and academia submitted 499 valid system outputs. The evaluation results indicate that speaker diarization has improved markedly since DIHARD I, particularly for two-party interactions, but that for many domains (e.g., web video) the problem remains far from solved. △ Less

Submitted 5 April, 2021; v1 submitted 2 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1906.07839

Probing Acoustic Representations for Phonetic Properties

Authors: Danni Ma, Neville Ryant, Mark Liberman

Abstract: Pre-trained acoustic representations such as wav2vec and DeCoAR have attained impressive word error rates (WER) for speech recognition benchmarks, particularly when labeled data is limited. But little is known about what phonetic properties these various representations acquire, and how well they encode transferable features of speech. We compare features from two conventional and four pre-trained… ▽ More Pre-trained acoustic representations such as wav2vec and DeCoAR have attained impressive word error rates (WER) for speech recognition benchmarks, particularly when labeled data is limited. But little is known about what phonetic properties these various representations acquire, and how well they encode transferable features of speech. We compare features from two conventional and four pre-trained systems in some simple frame-level phonetic classification tasks, with classifiers trained on features from one version of the TIMIT dataset and tested on features from another. All contextualized representations offered some level of transferability across domains, and models pre-trained on more audio data give better results; but overall, DeCoAR, the system with the simplest architecture, performs best. This type of benchmarking analysis can thus uncover relative strengths of various proposed acoustic representations. △ Less

Submitted 14 February, 2021; v1 submitted 24 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Third DIHARD Challenge Evaluation Plan

Authors: Neville Ryant, Kenneth Church, Christopher Cieri, Jun Du, Sriram Ganapathy, Mark Liberman

Abstract: This paper introduces the third DIHARD challenge, the third in a series of speaker diarization challenges intended to improve the robustness of diarization systems to variation in recording equipment, noise conditions, and conversational domain. The challenge comprises two tracks evaluating diarization performance when starting from a reference speech segmentation (track 1) and diarization from ra… ▽ More This paper introduces the third DIHARD challenge, the third in a series of speaker diarization challenges intended to improve the robustness of diarization systems to variation in recording equipment, noise conditions, and conversational domain. The challenge comprises two tracks evaluating diarization performance when starting from a reference speech segmentation (track 1) and diarization from raw audio scratch (track 2). We describe the task, metrics, datasets, and evaluation protocol. △ Less

Submitted 2 December, 2020; v1 submitted 4 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: Version 1.2 - Planned schedule updated - Updated numbers in tables from final versions of development/evaluation sets - Corrected typo

CHiME-6 Challenge:Tackling Multispeaker Speech Recognition for Unsegmented Recordings

Authors: Shinji Watanabe, Michael Mandel, Jon Barker, Emmanuel Vincent, Ashish Arora, Xuankai Chang, Sanjeev Khudanpur, Vimal Manohar, Daniel Povey, Desh Raj, David Snyder, Aswin Shanmugam Subramanian, Jan Trmal, Bar Ben Yair, Christoph Boeddeker, Zhaoheng Ni, Yusuke Fujita, Shota Horiguchi, Naoyuki Kanda, Takuya Yoshioka, Neville Ryant

Abstract: Following the success of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th CHiME challenges we organize the 6th CHiME Speech Separation and Recognition Challenge (CHiME-6). The new challenge revisits the previous CHiME-5 challenge and further considers the problem of distant multi-microphone conversational speech diarization and recognition in everyday home environments. Speech material is the same as the previous C… ▽ More Following the success of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th CHiME challenges we organize the 6th CHiME Speech Separation and Recognition Challenge (CHiME-6). The new challenge revisits the previous CHiME-5 challenge and further considers the problem of distant multi-microphone conversational speech diarization and recognition in everyday home environments. Speech material is the same as the previous CHiME-5 recordings except for accurate array synchronization. The material was elicited using a dinner party scenario with efforts taken to capture data that is representative of natural conversational speech. This paper provides a baseline description of the CHiME-6 challenge for both segmented multispeaker speech recognition (Track 1) and unsegmented multispeaker speech recognition (Track 2). Of note, Track 2 is the first challenge activity in the community to tackle an unsegmented multispeaker speech recognition scenario with a complete set of reproducible open source baselines providing speech enhancement, speaker diarization, and speech recognition modules. △ Less

Submitted 2 May, 2020; v1 submitted 20 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Parsing Early Modern English for Linguistic Search

Authors: Seth Kulick, Neville Ryant

Abstract: We investigate the question of whether advances in NLP over the last few years make it possible to vastly increase the size of data usable for research in historical syntax. This brings together many of the usual tools in NLP - word embeddings, tagging, and parsing - in the service of linguistic queries over automatically annotated corpora. We train a part-of-speech (POS) tagger and parser on a co… ▽ More We investigate the question of whether advances in NLP over the last few years make it possible to vastly increase the size of data usable for research in historical syntax. This brings together many of the usual tools in NLP - word embeddings, tagging, and parsing - in the service of linguistic queries over automatically annotated corpora. We train a part-of-speech (POS) tagger and parser on a corpus of historical English, using ELMo embeddings trained over a billion words of similar text. The evaluation is based on the standard metrics, as well as on the accuracy of the query searches using the parsed data. △ Less

Submitted 24 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

The Second DIHARD Diarization Challenge: Dataset, task, and baselines

Authors: Neville Ryant, Kenneth Church, Christopher Cieri, Alejandrina Cristia, Jun Du, Sriram Ganapathy, Mark Liberman

Abstract: This paper introduces the second DIHARD challenge, the second in a series of speaker diarization challenges intended to improve the robustness of diarization systems to variation in recording equipment, noise conditions, and conversational domain. The challenge comprises four tracks evaluating diarization performance under two input conditions (single channel vs. multi-channel) and two segmentatio… ▽ More This paper introduces the second DIHARD challenge, the second in a series of speaker diarization challenges intended to improve the robustness of diarization systems to variation in recording equipment, noise conditions, and conversational domain. The challenge comprises four tracks evaluating diarization performance under two input conditions (single channel vs. multi-channel) and two segmentation conditions (diarization from a reference speech segmentation vs. diarization from scratch). In order to prevent participants from overtuning to a particular combination of recording conditions and conversational domain, recordings are drawn from a variety of sources ranging from read audiobooks to meeting speech, to child language acquisition recordings, to dinner parties, to web video. We describe the task and metrics, challenge design, datasets, and baseline systems for speech enhancement, speech activity detection, and diarization. △ Less

Submitted 18 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

Comments: Accepted by Interspeech 2019