IrokoBench: A New Benchmark for African Languages in the Age of Large Language Models
Authors:
David Ifeoluwa Adelani,
Jessica Ojo,
Israel Abebe Azime,
Jian Yun Zhuang,
Jesujoba O. Alabi,
Xuanli He,
Millicent Ochieng,
Sara Hooker,
Andiswa Bukula,
En-Shiun Annie Lee,
Chiamaka Chukwuneke,
Happy Buzaaba,
Blessing Sibanda,
Godson Kalipe,
Jonathan Mukiibi,
Salomon Kabongo,
Foutse Yuehgoh,
Mmasibidi Setaka,
Lolwethu Ndolela,
Nkiruka Odu,
Rooweither Mabuya,
Shamsuddeen Hassan Muhammad,
Salomey Osei,
Sokhar Samb,
Tadesse Kebede Guge
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Despite the widespread adoption of Large language models (LLMs), their remarkable capabilities remain limited to a few high-resource languages. Additionally, many low-resource languages (e.g. African languages) are often evaluated only on basic text classification tasks due to the lack of appropriate or comprehensive benchmarks outside of high-resource languages. In this paper, we introduce IrokoB…
▽ More
Despite the widespread adoption of Large language models (LLMs), their remarkable capabilities remain limited to a few high-resource languages. Additionally, many low-resource languages (e.g. African languages) are often evaluated only on basic text classification tasks due to the lack of appropriate or comprehensive benchmarks outside of high-resource languages. In this paper, we introduce IrokoBench -- a human-translated benchmark dataset for 16 typologically-diverse low-resource African languages covering three tasks: natural language inference~(AfriXNLI), mathematical reasoning~(AfriMGSM), and multi-choice knowledge-based QA~(AfriMMLU). We use IrokoBench to evaluate zero-shot, few-shot, and translate-test settings~(where test sets are translated into English) across 10 open and four proprietary LLMs. Our evaluation reveals a significant performance gap between high-resource languages~(such as English and French) and low-resource African languages. We observe a significant performance gap between open and proprietary models, with the highest performing open model, Aya-101 only at 58\% of the best-performing proprietary model GPT-4o performance. Machine translating the test set to English before evaluation helped to close the gap for larger models that are English-centric, like LLaMa 3 70B. These findings suggest that more efforts are needed to develop and adapt LLMs for African languages.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
Quality at a Glance: An Audit of Web-Crawled Multilingual Datasets
Authors:
Julia Kreutzer,
Isaac Caswell,
Lisa Wang,
Ahsan Wahab,
Daan van Esch,
Nasanbayar Ulzii-Orshikh,
Allahsera Tapo,
Nishant Subramani,
Artem Sokolov,
Claytone Sikasote,
Monang Setyawan,
Supheakmungkol Sarin,
Sokhar Samb,
Benoît Sagot,
Clara Rivera,
Annette Rios,
Isabel Papadimitriou,
Salomey Osei,
Pedro Ortiz Suarez,
Iroro Orife,
Kelechi Ogueji,
Andre Niyongabo Rubungo,
Toan Q. Nguyen,
Mathias Müller,
André Müller
, et al. (27 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
With the success of large-scale pre-training and multilingual modeling in Natural Language Processing (NLP), recent years have seen a proliferation of large, web-mined text datasets covering hundreds of languages. We manually audit the quality of 205 language-specific corpora released with five major public datasets (CCAligned, ParaCrawl, WikiMatrix, OSCAR, mC4). Lower-resource corpora have system…
▽ More
With the success of large-scale pre-training and multilingual modeling in Natural Language Processing (NLP), recent years have seen a proliferation of large, web-mined text datasets covering hundreds of languages. We manually audit the quality of 205 language-specific corpora released with five major public datasets (CCAligned, ParaCrawl, WikiMatrix, OSCAR, mC4). Lower-resource corpora have systematic issues: At least 15 corpora have no usable text, and a significant fraction contains less than 50% sentences of acceptable quality. In addition, many are mislabeled or use nonstandard/ambiguous language codes. We demonstrate that these issues are easy to detect even for non-proficient speakers, and supplement the human audit with automatic analyses. Finally, we recommend techniques to evaluate and improve multilingual corpora and discuss potential risks that come with low-quality data releases.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2022; v1 submitted 22 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
