-
A Study about the Knowledge and Use of Requirements Engineering Standards in Industry
Authors:
Xavier Franch,
Martin Glinz,
Daniel Mendez,
Norbert Seyff
Abstract:
Context: The use of standards is considered a vital part of any engineering discipline. So one could expect that standards play an important role in Requirements Engineering (RE) as well. However, little is known about the actual knowledge and use of RE-related standards in industry. Objective: In this article, we investigate to which extent standards and related artifacts such as templates or gui…
▽ More
Context: The use of standards is considered a vital part of any engineering discipline. So one could expect that standards play an important role in Requirements Engineering (RE) as well. However, little is known about the actual knowledge and use of RE-related standards in industry. Objective: In this article, we investigate to which extent standards and related artifacts such as templates or guidelines are known and used by RE practitioners. Method: To this end, we have conducted a questionnaire-based online survey. We could analyze the replies from 90 RE practitioners using a combination of closed and open-text questions. Results: Our results indicate that the knowledge and use of standards and related artifacts in RE is less widespread than one might expect from an engineering perspective. For example, about 47% of the respondents working as requirements engineers or business analysts do not know the core standard in RE, ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148. Participants in our study mostly use standards by personal decision rather than being imposed by their respective company, customer, or regulator. Beyond insufficient knowledge, we also found cultural and organizational factors impeding the widespread adoption of standards in RE. Conclusions: Overall, our results provide empirically informed insights into the actual use of standards and related artifacts in RE practice and - indirectly - about the value that the current standards create for RE practitioners.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2021; v1 submitted 28 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Generating Requirements Out of Thin Air: Towards Automated Feature Identification for New Apps
Authors:
Tahira Iqbal,
Norbert Seyff,
Daniel Mendez Fernández
Abstract:
App store mining has proven to be a promising technique for requirements elicitation as companies can gain valuable knowledge to maintain and evolve existing apps. However, despite first advancements in using mining techniques for requirements elicitation, little is yet known how to distill requirements for new apps based on existing (similar) solutions and how exactly practitioners would benefit…
▽ More
App store mining has proven to be a promising technique for requirements elicitation as companies can gain valuable knowledge to maintain and evolve existing apps. However, despite first advancements in using mining techniques for requirements elicitation, little is yet known how to distill requirements for new apps based on existing (similar) solutions and how exactly practitioners would benefit from such a technique. In the proposed work, we focus on exploring information (e.g. app store data) provided by the crowd about existing solutions to identify key features of applications in a particular domain. We argue that these discovered features and other related influential aspects (e.g. ratings) can help practitioners(e.g. software developer) to identify potential key features for new applications. To support this argument, we first conducted an interview study with practitioners to understand the extent to which such an approach would find champions in practice. In this paper, we present the first results of our ongoing research in the context of a larger road-map. Our interview study confirms that practitioners see the need for our envisioned approach. Furthermore, we present an early conceptual solution to discuss the feasibility of our approach. However, this manuscript is also intended to foster discussions on the extent to which machine learning can and should be applied to elicit automated requirements on crowd generated data on different forums and to identify further collaborations in this endeavor.
△ Less
Submitted 25 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Do We Preach What We Practice? Investigating the Practical Relevance of Requirements Engineering Syllabi - The IREB Case
Authors:
Daniel Méndez Fernández,
Xavier Franch,
Norbert Seyff,
Michael Felderer,
Martin Glinz,
Marcos Kalinowski,
Andreas Volgelsang,
Stefan Wagner,
Stan Bühne,
Kim Lauenroth
Abstract:
Nowadays, there exist a plethora of different educational syllabi for Requirements Engineering (RE), all aiming at incorporating practically relevant educational units (EUs). Many of these syllabi are based, in one way or the other, on the syllabi provided by the International Requirements Engineering Board (IREB), a non-profit organisation devoted to standardised certification programs for RE. IR…
▽ More
Nowadays, there exist a plethora of different educational syllabi for Requirements Engineering (RE), all aiming at incorporating practically relevant educational units (EUs). Many of these syllabi are based, in one way or the other, on the syllabi provided by the International Requirements Engineering Board (IREB), a non-profit organisation devoted to standardised certification programs for RE. IREB syllabi are developed by RE experts and are, thus, based on the assumption that they address topics of practical relevance. However, little is known about to what extent practitioners actually perceive those contents as useful. We have started a study to investigate the relevance of the EUs included in the IREB Foundation Level certification programme. In a first phase reported in this paper, we have surveyed practitioners mainly from DACH countries (Germany, Austria and Switzerland) participating in the IREB certification. Later phases will widen the scope both by including other countries and by not requiring IREB-certified participants. The results shall foster a critical reflection on the practical relevance of EUs built upon the de-facto standard syllabus of IREB.
△ Less
Submitted 10 June, 2019; v1 submitted 1 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
-
Blueprint and Evaluation Instruments for a Course on Software Engineering for Sustainability
Authors:
Birgit Penzenstadler,
Stefanie Betz,
Colin C. Venters,
Ruzanna Chitchyan,
Jari Porras,
Norbert Seyff,
Leticia Duboc,
Christoph Becker
Abstract:
We report on a summer school course on Software Engineering for Sustainability (SE4S). We provide a detailed blueprint of the contents taught and its evaluation with the instruments that were used.
We report on a summer school course on Software Engineering for Sustainability (SE4S). We provide a detailed blueprint of the contents taught and its evaluation with the instruments that were used.
△ Less
Submitted 7 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
The Karlskrona manifesto for sustainability design
Authors:
Christoph Becker,
Ruzanna Chitchyan,
Leticia Duboc,
Steve Easterbrook,
Martin Mahaux,
Birgit Penzenstadler,
Guillermo Rodriguez-Navas,
Camille Salinesi,
Norbert Seyff,
Colin Venters,
Coral Calero,
Sedef Akinli Kocak,
Stefanie Betz
Abstract:
Sustainability is a central concern for our society, and software systems increasingly play a central role in it. As designers of software technology, we cause change and are responsible for the effects of our design choices. We recognize that there is a rapidly increasing awareness of the fundamental need and desire for a more sustainable world, and there is a lot of genuine goodwill. However, th…
▽ More
Sustainability is a central concern for our society, and software systems increasingly play a central role in it. As designers of software technology, we cause change and are responsible for the effects of our design choices. We recognize that there is a rapidly increasing awareness of the fundamental need and desire for a more sustainable world, and there is a lot of genuine goodwill. However, this alone will be ineffective unless we come to understand and address our persistent misperceptions. The Karlskrona Manifesto for Sustainability Design aims to initiate a much needed conversation in and beyond the software community by highlighting such perceptions and proposing a set of fundamental principles for sustainability design.
△ Less
Submitted 10 May, 2015; v1 submitted 25 October, 2014;
originally announced October 2014.
