-
Wooly Graphs : A Mathematical Framework For Knitting
Authors:
Kathryn Gray,
Brian Bell,
Diana Sieper,
Stephen Kobourov,
Falk Schreiber,
Karsten Klein,
Seokhee Hong
Abstract:
This paper aims to develop a mathematical foundation to model knitting with graphs. We provide a precise definition for knit objects with a knot theoretic component and propose a simple undirected graph, a simple directed graph, and a directed multigraph model for any arbitrary knit object. Using these models, we propose natural categories related to the complexity of knitting structures. We use t…
▽ More
This paper aims to develop a mathematical foundation to model knitting with graphs. We provide a precise definition for knit objects with a knot theoretic component and propose a simple undirected graph, a simple directed graph, and a directed multigraph model for any arbitrary knit object. Using these models, we propose natural categories related to the complexity of knitting structures. We use these categories to explore the hardness of determining whether a knit object of each class exists for a given graph. We show that while this problem is NP-hard in general, under specific cases, there are linear and polynomial time algorithms which take advantage of unique properties of common knitting techniques. This work aims to bridge the gap between textile arts and graph theory, offering a useful and rigorous framework for analyzing knitting objects using their corresponding graphs and for generating knitting objects from graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2024; v1 submitted 29 June, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Constrained Level Planarity is FPT with Respect to the Vertex Cover Number
Authors:
Boris Klemz,
Marie Diana Sieper
Abstract:
The problem Level Planarity asks for a crossing-free drawing of a graph in the plane such that vertices are placed at prescribed y-coordinates (called levels) and such that every edge is realized as a y-monotone curve. In the variant Constrained Level Planarity, each level y is equipped with a partial order <_y on its vertices and in the desired drawing the left-to-right order of vertices on level…
▽ More
The problem Level Planarity asks for a crossing-free drawing of a graph in the plane such that vertices are placed at prescribed y-coordinates (called levels) and such that every edge is realized as a y-monotone curve. In the variant Constrained Level Planarity, each level y is equipped with a partial order <_y on its vertices and in the desired drawing the left-to-right order of vertices on level y has to be a linear extension of <_y. Constrained Level Planarity is known to be a remarkably difficult problem: previous results by Klemz and Rote [ACM Trans. Alg. 2019] and by Brückner and Rutter [SODA 2017] imply that it remains NP-hard even when restricted to graphs whose tree-depth and feedback vertex set number are bounded by a constant and even when the instances are additionally required to be either proper, meaning that each edge spans two consecutive levels, or ordered, meaning that all given partial orders are total orders. In particular, these results rule out the existence of FPT-time (even XP-time) algorithms with respect to these and related graph parameters (unless P=NP). However, the parameterized complexity of Constrained Level Planarity with respect to the vertex cover number of the input graph remained open.
In this paper, we show that Constrained Level Planarity can be solved in FPT-time when parameterized by the vertex cover number. In view of the previous intractability statements, our result is best-possible in several regards: a speed-up to polynomial time or a generalization to the aforementioned smaller graph parameters is not possible, even if restricting to proper or ordered instances.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Constrained and Ordered Level Planarity Parameterized by the Number of Levels
Authors:
Václav Blažej,
Boris Klemz,
Felix Klesen,
Marie Diana Sieper,
Alexander Wolff,
Johannes Zink
Abstract:
The problem Level Planarity asks for a crossing-free drawing of a graph in the plane such that vertices are placed at prescribed y-coordinates (called levels) and such that every edge is realized as a y-monotone curve. In the variant Constrained Level Planarity (CLP), each level $y$ is equipped with a partial order $\prec_y$ on its vertices and in the desired drawing the left-to-right order of ver…
▽ More
The problem Level Planarity asks for a crossing-free drawing of a graph in the plane such that vertices are placed at prescribed y-coordinates (called levels) and such that every edge is realized as a y-monotone curve. In the variant Constrained Level Planarity (CLP), each level $y$ is equipped with a partial order $\prec_y$ on its vertices and in the desired drawing the left-to-right order of vertices on level $y$ has to be a linear extension of $\prec_y$. Ordered Level Planarity (OLP) corresponds to the special case of CLP where the given partial orders $\prec_y$ are total orders. Previous results by Brückner and Rutter [SODA 2017] and Klemz and Rote [ACM Trans. Alg. 2019] state that both CLP and OLP are NP-hard even in severely restricted cases. In particular, they remain NP-hard even when restricted to instances whose width (the maximum number of vertices that may share a common level) is at most two. In this paper, we focus on the other dimension: we study the parameterized complexity of CLP and OLP with respect to the height (the number of levels).
We show that OLP parameterized by the height is complete with respect to the complexity class XNLP, which was first studied by Elberfeld et al. [Algorithmica 2015] (under a different name) and recently made more prominent by Bodlaender et al. [FOCS 2021]. It contains all parameterized problems that can be solved nondeterministically in time $f(k) n^{O(1)}$ and space $f(k) \log n$ (where $f$ is a computable function, $n$ is the input size, and $k$ is the parameter). If a problem is XNLP-complete, it lies in XP, but is W[$t$]-hard for every $t$.
In contrast to the fact that OLP parameterized by the height lies in XP, it turns out that CLP is NP-hard even when restricted to instances of height 4. We complement this result by showing that CLP can be solved in polynomial time for instances of height at most 3.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Clustered Planarity Variants for Level Graphs
Authors:
Simon D. Fink,
Matthias Pfretzschner,
Ignaz Rutter,
Marie Diana Sieper
Abstract:
We consider variants of the clustered planarity problem for level-planar drawings. So far, only convex clusters have been studied in this setting. We introduce two new variants that both insist on a level-planar drawing of the input graph but relax the requirements on the shape of the clusters. In unrestricted Clustered Level Planarity (uCLP) we only require that they are bounded by simple closed…
▽ More
We consider variants of the clustered planarity problem for level-planar drawings. So far, only convex clusters have been studied in this setting. We introduce two new variants that both insist on a level-planar drawing of the input graph but relax the requirements on the shape of the clusters. In unrestricted Clustered Level Planarity (uCLP) we only require that they are bounded by simple closed curves that enclose exactly the vertices of the cluster and cross each edge of the graph at most once. The problem y-monotone Clustered Level Planarity (y-CLP) requires that additionally it must be possible to augment each cluster with edges that do not cross the cluster boundaries so that it becomes connected while the graph remains level-planar, thereby mimicking a classic characterization of clustered planarity in the level-planar setting.
We give a polynomial-time algorithm for uCLP if the input graph is biconnected and has a single source. By contrast, we show that y-CLP is hard under the same restrictions and it remains NP-hard even if the number of levels is bounded by a constant and there is only a single non-trivial cluster.
△ Less
Submitted 20 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Morphing Graph Drawings in the Presence of Point Obstacles
Authors:
Oksana Firman,
Tim Hegemann,
Boris Klemz,
Felix Klesen,
Marie Diana Sieper,
Alexander Wolff,
Johannes Zink
Abstract:
A crossing-free morph is a continuous deformation between two graph drawings that preserves straight-line pairwise noncrossing edges. Motivated by applications in 3D morphing problems, we initiate the study of morphing graph drawings in the plane in the presence of stationary point obstacles, which need to be avoided throughout the deformation. As our main result, we prove that it is NP-hard to de…
▽ More
A crossing-free morph is a continuous deformation between two graph drawings that preserves straight-line pairwise noncrossing edges. Motivated by applications in 3D morphing problems, we initiate the study of morphing graph drawings in the plane in the presence of stationary point obstacles, which need to be avoided throughout the deformation. As our main result, we prove that it is NP-hard to decide whether such an obstacle-avoiding 2D morph between two given drawings of the same graph exists. This is in sharp contrast to the classical case without obstacles, where there is an efficiently verifiable (necessary and sufficient) criterion for the existence of a morph.
△ Less
Submitted 24 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Parameterized and Approximation Algorithms for the Maximum Bimodal Subgraph Problem
Authors:
Walter Didimo,
Fedor V. Fomin,
Petr A. Golovach,
Tanmay Inamdar,
Stephen Kobourov,
Marie Diana Sieper
Abstract:
A vertex of a plane digraph is bimodal if all its incoming edges (and hence all its outgoing edges) are consecutive in the cyclic order around it. A plane digraph is bimodal if all its vertices are bimodal. Bimodality is at the heart of many types of graph layouts, such as upward drawings, level-planar drawings, and L-drawings. If the graph is not bimodal, the Maximum Bimodal Subgraph (MBS) proble…
▽ More
A vertex of a plane digraph is bimodal if all its incoming edges (and hence all its outgoing edges) are consecutive in the cyclic order around it. A plane digraph is bimodal if all its vertices are bimodal. Bimodality is at the heart of many types of graph layouts, such as upward drawings, level-planar drawings, and L-drawings. If the graph is not bimodal, the Maximum Bimodal Subgraph (MBS) problem asks for an embedding-preserving bimodal subgraph with the maximum number of edges. We initiate the study of the MBS problem from the parameterized complexity perspective with two main results: (i) we describe an FPT algorithm parameterized by the branchwidth (and hence by the treewidth) of the graph; (ii) we establish that MBS parameterized by the number of non-bimodal vertices admits a polynomial kernel. As the byproduct of these results, we obtain a subexponential FPT algorithm and an efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme for MBS.
△ Less
Submitted 29 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
