-
A Framework For Discussing LLMs as Tools for Qualitative Analysis
Authors:
James Eschrich,
Sarah Sterman
Abstract:
We review discourses about the philosophy of science in qualitative research and evidence from cognitive linguistics in order to ground a framework for discussing the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to support the qualitative analysis process. This framework involves asking two key questions: "is the LLM proposing or refuting a qualitative model?" and "is the human researcher checking the LLM'…
▽ More
We review discourses about the philosophy of science in qualitative research and evidence from cognitive linguistics in order to ground a framework for discussing the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to support the qualitative analysis process. This framework involves asking two key questions: "is the LLM proposing or refuting a qualitative model?" and "is the human researcher checking the LLM's decision-making directly?". We then discuss an implication of this framework: that using LLMs to surface counter-examples for human review represents a promising space for the adoption of LLMs into the qualitative research process. This space is promising because it is a site of overlap between researchers working from a variety of philosophical assumptions, enabling productive cross-paradigm collaboration on tools and practices.
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Ai.llude: Encouraging Rewriting AI-Generated Text to Support Creative Expression
Authors:
David Zhou,
Sarah Sterman
Abstract:
In each step of the creative writing process, writers must grapple with their creative goals and individual perspectives. This process affects the writer's sense of authenticity and their engagement with the written output. Fluent text generation by AIs risks undermining the reflective loop of rewriting. We hypothesize that deliberately generating imperfect intermediate text can encourage rewritin…
▽ More
In each step of the creative writing process, writers must grapple with their creative goals and individual perspectives. This process affects the writer's sense of authenticity and their engagement with the written output. Fluent text generation by AIs risks undermining the reflective loop of rewriting. We hypothesize that deliberately generating imperfect intermediate text can encourage rewriting and prompt higher level decision making. Using logs from 27 writing sessions using a text generation AI, we characterize how writers adapt and rewrite AI suggestions, and show that intermediate suggestions significantly motivate and increase rewriting. We discuss the implications of this finding, and future steps for investigating how to leverage intermediate text in AI writing support tools to support ownership over creative expression.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants
Authors:
Mina Lee,
Katy Ilonka Gero,
John Joon Young Chung,
Simon Buckingham Shum,
Vipul Raheja,
Hua Shen,
Subhashini Venugopalan,
Thiemo Wambsganss,
David Zhou,
Emad A. Alghamdi,
Tal August,
Avinash Bhat,
Madiha Zahrah Choksi,
Senjuti Dutta,
Jin L. C. Guo,
Md Naimul Hoque,
Yewon Kim,
Simon Knight,
Seyed Parsa Neshaei,
Agnia Sergeyuk,
Antonette Shibani,
Disha Shrivastava,
Lila Shroff,
Jessi Stark,
Sarah Sterman
, et al. (11 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In our era of rapid technological advancement, the research landscape for writing assistants has become increasingly fragmented across various research communities. We seek to address this challenge by proposing a design space as a structured way to examine and explore the multidimensional space of intelligent and interactive writing assistants. Through a large community collaboration, we explore…
▽ More
In our era of rapid technological advancement, the research landscape for writing assistants has become increasingly fragmented across various research communities. We seek to address this challenge by proposing a design space as a structured way to examine and explore the multidimensional space of intelligent and interactive writing assistants. Through a large community collaboration, we explore five aspects of writing assistants: task, user, technology, interaction, and ecosystem. Within each aspect, we define dimensions (i.e., fundamental components of an aspect) and codes (i.e., potential options for each dimension) by systematically reviewing 115 papers. Our design space aims to offer researchers and designers a practical tool to navigate, comprehend, and compare the various possibilities of writing assistants, and aid in the envisioning and design of new writing assistants.
△ Less
Submitted 26 March, 2024; v1 submitted 21 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Mechanical Novel: Crowdsourcing Complex Work through Reflection and Revision
Authors:
Joy Kim,
Sarah Sterman,
Allegra Argent Beal Cohen,
Michael S. Bernstein
Abstract:
Crowdsourcing systems accomplish large tasks with scale and speed by breaking work down into independent parts. However, many types of complex creative work, such as fiction writing, have remained out of reach for crowds because work is tightly interdependent: changing one part of a story may trigger changes to the overall plot and vice versa. Taking inspiration from how expert authors write, we p…
▽ More
Crowdsourcing systems accomplish large tasks with scale and speed by breaking work down into independent parts. However, many types of complex creative work, such as fiction writing, have remained out of reach for crowds because work is tightly interdependent: changing one part of a story may trigger changes to the overall plot and vice versa. Taking inspiration from how expert authors write, we propose a technique for achieving interdependent complex goals with crowds. With this technique, the crowd loops between reflection, to select a high-level goal, and revision, to decompose that goal into low-level, actionable tasks. We embody this approach in Mechanical Novel, a system that crowdsources short fiction stories on Amazon Mechanical Turk. In a field experiment, Mechanical Novel resulted in higher-quality stories than an iterative crowdsourcing workflow. Our findings suggest that orienting crowd work around high-level goals may enable workers to coordinate their effort to accomplish complex work.
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
