Showing 1–9 of 9 results for author: Unhelkar, V

IDIL: Imitation Learning of Intent-Driven Expert Behavior

Authors: Sangwon Seo, Vaibhav Unhelkar

Abstract: When faced with accomplishing a task, human experts exhibit intentional behavior. Their unique intents shape their plans and decisions, resulting in experts demonstrating diverse behaviors to accomplish the same task. Due to the uncertainties encountered in the real world and their bounded rationality, experts sometimes adjust their intents, which in turn influences their behaviors during task exe… ▽ More When faced with accomplishing a task, human experts exhibit intentional behavior. Their unique intents shape their plans and decisions, resulting in experts demonstrating diverse behaviors to accomplish the same task. Due to the uncertainties encountered in the real world and their bounded rationality, experts sometimes adjust their intents, which in turn influences their behaviors during task execution. This paper introduces IDIL, a novel imitation learning algorithm to mimic these diverse intent-driven behaviors of experts. Iteratively, our approach estimates expert intent from heterogeneous demonstrations and then uses it to learn an intent-aware model of their behavior. Unlike contemporary approaches, IDIL is capable of addressing sequential tasks with high-dimensional state representations, while sidestepping the complexities and drawbacks associated with adversarial training (a mainstay of related techniques). Our empirical results suggest that the models generated by IDIL either match or surpass those produced by recent imitation learning benchmarks in metrics of task performance. Moreover, as it creates a generative model, IDIL demonstrates superior performance in intent inference metrics, crucial for human-agent interactions, and aptly captures a broad spectrum of expert behaviors. △ Less

Submitted 25 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: Extended version of an identically-titled paper accepted at AAMAS 2024

I-CEE: Tailoring Explanations of Image Classification Models to User Expertise

Authors: Yao Rong, Peizhu Qian, Vaibhav Unhelkar, Enkelejda Kasneci

Abstract: Effectively explaining decisions of black-box machine learning models is critical to responsible deployment of AI systems that rely on them. Recognizing their importance, the field of explainable AI (XAI) provides several techniques to generate these explanations. Yet, there is relatively little emphasis on the user (the explainee) in this growing body of work and most XAI techniques generate "one… ▽ More Effectively explaining decisions of black-box machine learning models is critical to responsible deployment of AI systems that rely on them. Recognizing their importance, the field of explainable AI (XAI) provides several techniques to generate these explanations. Yet, there is relatively little emphasis on the user (the explainee) in this growing body of work and most XAI techniques generate "one-size-fits-all" explanations. To bridge this gap and achieve a step closer towards human-centered XAI, we present I-CEE, a framework that provides Image Classification Explanations tailored to User Expertise. Informed by existing work, I-CEE explains the decisions of image classification models by providing the user with an informative subset of training data (i.e., example images), corresponding local explanations, and model decisions. However, unlike prior work, I-CEE models the informativeness of the example images to depend on user expertise, resulting in different examples for different users. We posit that by tailoring the example set to user expertise, I-CEE can better facilitate users' understanding and simulatability of the model. To evaluate our approach, we conduct detailed experiments in both simulation and with human participants (N = 100) on multiple datasets. Experiments with simulated users show that I-CEE improves users' ability to accurately predict the model's decisions (simulatability) compared to baselines, providing promising preliminary results. Experiments with human participants demonstrate that our method significantly improves user simulatability accuracy, highlighting the importance of human-centered XAI △ Less

Submitted 10 January, 2024; v1 submitted 19 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

GO-DICE: Goal-Conditioned Option-Aware Offline Imitation Learning via Stationary Distribution Correction Estimation

Authors: Abhinav Jain, Vaibhav Unhelkar

Abstract: Offline imitation learning (IL) refers to learning expert behavior solely from demonstrations, without any additional interaction with the environment. Despite significant advances in offline IL, existing techniques find it challenging to learn policies for long-horizon tasks and require significant re-training when task specifications change. Towards addressing these limitations, we present GO-DI… ▽ More Offline imitation learning (IL) refers to learning expert behavior solely from demonstrations, without any additional interaction with the environment. Despite significant advances in offline IL, existing techniques find it challenging to learn policies for long-horizon tasks and require significant re-training when task specifications change. Towards addressing these limitations, we present GO-DICE an offline IL technique for goal-conditioned long-horizon sequential tasks. GO-DICE discerns a hierarchy of sub-tasks from demonstrations and uses these to learn separate policies for sub-task transitions and action execution, respectively; this hierarchical policy learning facilitates long-horizon reasoning. Inspired by the expansive DICE-family of techniques, policy learning at both the levels transpires within the space of stationary distributions. Further, both policies are learnt with goal conditioning to minimize need for retraining when task goals change. Experimental results substantiate that GO-DICE outperforms recent baselines, as evidenced by a marked improvement in the completion rate of increasingly challenging pick-and-place Mujoco robotic tasks. GO-DICE is also capable of leveraging imperfect demonstration and partial task segmentation when available, both of which boost task performance relative to learning from expert demonstrations alone. △ Less

Submitted 17 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Comments: Extended version of an identically-titled paper accepted at AAAI 2024

Automated Task-Time Interventions to Improve Teamwork using Imitation Learning

Authors: Sangwon Seo, Bing Han, Vaibhav Unhelkar

Abstract: Effective human-human and human-autonomy teamwork is critical but often challenging to perfect. The challenge is particularly relevant in time-critical domains, such as healthcare and disaster response, where the time pressures can make coordination increasingly difficult to achieve and the consequences of imperfect coordination can be severe. To improve teamwork in these and other domains, we pre… ▽ More Effective human-human and human-autonomy teamwork is critical but often challenging to perfect. The challenge is particularly relevant in time-critical domains, such as healthcare and disaster response, where the time pressures can make coordination increasingly difficult to achieve and the consequences of imperfect coordination can be severe. To improve teamwork in these and other domains, we present TIC: an automated intervention approach for improving coordination between team members. Using BTIL, a multi-agent imitation learning algorithm, our approach first learns a generative model of team behavior from past task execution data. Next, it utilizes the learned generative model and team's task objective (shared reward) to algorithmically generate execution-time interventions. We evaluate our approach in synthetic multi-agent teaming scenarios, where team members make decentralized decisions without full observability of the environment. The experiments demonstrate that the automated interventions can successfully improve team performance and shed light on the design of autonomous agents for improving teamwork. △ Less

Submitted 2 March, 2023; v1 submitted 1 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Comments: Extended version of an identically-titled paper accepted at AAMAS 2023

Towards Human-centered Explainable AI: A Survey of User Studies for Model Explanations

Authors: Yao Rong, Tobias Leemann, Thai-trang Nguyen, Lisa Fiedler, Peizhu Qian, Vaibhav Unhelkar, Tina Seidel, Gjergji Kasneci, Enkelejda Kasneci

Abstract: Explainable AI (XAI) is widely viewed as a sine qua non for ever-expanding AI research. A better understanding of the needs of XAI users, as well as human-centered evaluations of explainable models are both a necessity and a challenge. In this paper, we explore how HCI and AI researchers conduct user studies in XAI applications based on a systematic literature review. After identifying and thoroug… ▽ More Explainable AI (XAI) is widely viewed as a sine qua non for ever-expanding AI research. A better understanding of the needs of XAI users, as well as human-centered evaluations of explainable models are both a necessity and a challenge. In this paper, we explore how HCI and AI researchers conduct user studies in XAI applications based on a systematic literature review. After identifying and thoroughly analyzing 97core papers with human-based XAI evaluations over the past five years, we categorize them along the measured characteristics of explanatory methods, namely trust, understanding, usability, and human-AI collaboration performance. Our research shows that XAI is spreading more rapidly in certain application domains, such as recommender systems than in others, but that user evaluations are still rather sparse and incorporate hardly any insights from cognitive or social sciences. Based on a comprehensive discussion of best practices, i.e., common models, design choices, and measures in user studies, we propose practical guidelines on designing and conducting user studies for XAI researchers and practitioners. Lastly, this survey also highlights several open research directions, particularly linking psychological science and human-centered XAI. △ Less

Submitted 19 December, 2023; v1 submitted 20 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Semi-Supervised Imitation Learning of Team Policies from Suboptimal Demonstrations

Authors: Sangwon Seo, Vaibhav V. Unhelkar

Abstract: We present Bayesian Team Imitation Learner (BTIL), an imitation learning algorithm to model the behavior of teams performing sequential tasks in Markovian domains. In contrast to existing multi-agent imitation learning techniques, BTIL explicitly models and infers the time-varying mental states of team members, thereby enabling learning of decentralized team policies from demonstrations of subopti… ▽ More We present Bayesian Team Imitation Learner (BTIL), an imitation learning algorithm to model the behavior of teams performing sequential tasks in Markovian domains. In contrast to existing multi-agent imitation learning techniques, BTIL explicitly models and infers the time-varying mental states of team members, thereby enabling learning of decentralized team policies from demonstrations of suboptimal teamwork. Further, to allow for sample- and label-efficient policy learning from small datasets, BTIL employs a Bayesian perspective and is capable of learning from semi-supervised demonstrations. We demonstrate and benchmark the performance of BTIL on synthetic multi-agent tasks as well as a novel dataset of human-agent teamwork. Our experiments show that BTIL can successfully learn team policies from demonstrations despite the influence of team members' (time-varying and potentially misaligned) mental states on their behavior. △ Less

Submitted 19 September, 2022; v1 submitted 5 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Comments: Extended version of an identically-titled paper accepted at IJCAI 2022

A Bayesian Approach to Identifying Representational Errors

Authors: Ramya Ramakrishnan, Vaibhav Unhelkar, Ece Kamar, Julie Shah

Abstract: Trained AI systems and expert decision makers can make errors that are often difficult to identify and understand. Determining the root cause for these errors can improve future decisions. This work presents Generative Error Model (GEM), a generative model for inferring representational errors based on observations of an actor's behavior (either simulated agent, robot, or human). The model conside… ▽ More Trained AI systems and expert decision makers can make errors that are often difficult to identify and understand. Determining the root cause for these errors can improve future decisions. This work presents Generative Error Model (GEM), a generative model for inferring representational errors based on observations of an actor's behavior (either simulated agent, robot, or human). The model considers two sources of error: those that occur due to representational limitations -- "blind spots" -- and non-representational errors, such as those caused by noise in execution or systematic errors present in the actor's policy. Disambiguating these two error types allows for targeted refinement of the actor's policy (i.e., representational errors require perceptual augmentation, while other errors can be reduced through methods such as improved training or attention support). We present a Bayesian inference algorithm for GEM and evaluate its utility in recovering representational errors on multiple domains. Results show that our approach can recover blind spots of both reinforcement learning agents as well as human users. △ Less

Submitted 28 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Towards an AI Coach to Infer Team Mental Model Alignment in Healthcare

Authors: Sangwon Seo, Lauren R. Kennedy-Metz, Marco A. Zenati, Julie A. Shah, Roger D. Dias, Vaibhav V. Unhelkar

Abstract: Shared mental models are critical to team success; however, in practice, team members may have misaligned models due to a variety of factors. In safety-critical domains (e.g., aviation, healthcare), lack of shared mental models can lead to preventable errors and harm. Towards the goal of mitigating such preventable errors, here, we present a Bayesian approach to infer misalignment in team members'… ▽ More Shared mental models are critical to team success; however, in practice, team members may have misaligned models due to a variety of factors. In safety-critical domains (e.g., aviation, healthcare), lack of shared mental models can lead to preventable errors and harm. Towards the goal of mitigating such preventable errors, here, we present a Bayesian approach to infer misalignment in team members' mental models during complex healthcare task execution. As an exemplary application, we demonstrate our approach using two simulated team-based scenarios, derived from actual teamwork in cardiac surgery. In these simulated experiments, our approach inferred model misalignment with over 75% recall, thereby providing a building block for enabling computer-assisted interventions to augment human cognition in the operating room and improve teamwork. △ Less

Submitted 16 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: Submitted to the 2021 IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA)

MSC Class: 68T37; 62F15 (Primary) 90C40; 62M05; 62P10; 91C99 (Secondary) ACM Class: I.2.m; G.3; J.3

Learning Dense Rewards for Contact-Rich Manipulation Tasks

Authors: Zheng Wu, Wenzhao Lian, Vaibhav Unhelkar, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Stefan Schaal

Abstract: Rewards play a crucial role in reinforcement learning. To arrive at the desired policy, the design of a suitable reward function often requires significant domain expertise as well as trial-and-error. Here, we aim to minimize the effort involved in designing reward functions for contact-rich manipulation tasks. In particular, we provide an approach capable of extracting dense reward functions algo… ▽ More Rewards play a crucial role in reinforcement learning. To arrive at the desired policy, the design of a suitable reward function often requires significant domain expertise as well as trial-and-error. Here, we aim to minimize the effort involved in designing reward functions for contact-rich manipulation tasks. In particular, we provide an approach capable of extracting dense reward functions algorithmically from robots' high-dimensional observations, such as images and tactile feedback. In contrast to state-of-the-art high-dimensional reward learning methodologies, our approach does not leverage adversarial training, and is thus less prone to the associated training instabilities. Instead, our approach learns rewards by estimating task progress in a self-supervised manner. We demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach on two contact-rich manipulation tasks, namely, peg-in-hole and USB insertion. The experimental results indicate that the policies trained with the learned reward function achieves better performance and faster convergence compared to the baselines. △ Less

Submitted 17 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

Comments: 8 pages, 5 figures