-
Gluing resource proof-structures: inhabitation and inverting the Taylor expansion
Authors:
Giulio Guerrieri,
Luc Pellissier,
Lorenzo Tortora de Falco
Abstract:
A Multiplicative-Exponential Linear Logic (MELL) proof-structure can be expanded into a set of resource proof-structures: its Taylor expansion. We introduce a new criterion characterizing (and deciding in the finite case) those sets of resource proof-structures that are part of the Taylor expansion of some MELL proof-structure, through a rewriting system acting both on resource and MELL proof-stru…
▽ More
A Multiplicative-Exponential Linear Logic (MELL) proof-structure can be expanded into a set of resource proof-structures: its Taylor expansion. We introduce a new criterion characterizing (and deciding in the finite case) those sets of resource proof-structures that are part of the Taylor expansion of some MELL proof-structure, through a rewriting system acting both on resource and MELL proof-structures. We also prove semi-decidability of the type inhabitation problem for cut-free MELL proof-structures.
△ Less
Submitted 21 April, 2022; v1 submitted 6 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Glueability of resource proof-structures: inverting the Taylor expansion (long version)
Authors:
Giulio Guerrieri,
Luc Pellissier,
Lorenzo Tortora de Falco
Abstract:
A Multiplicative-Exponential Linear Logic (MELL) proof-structure can be expanded into a set of resource proof-structures: its Taylor expansion. We introduce a new criterion characterizing those sets of resource proof-structures that are part of the Taylor expansion of some MELL proof-structure, through a rewriting system acting both on resource and MELL proof-structures.
A Multiplicative-Exponential Linear Logic (MELL) proof-structure can be expanded into a set of resource proof-structures: its Taylor expansion. We introduce a new criterion characterizing those sets of resource proof-structures that are part of the Taylor expansion of some MELL proof-structure, through a rewriting system acting both on resource and MELL proof-structures.
△ Less
Submitted 17 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
Proceedings Joint International Workshop on Linearity & Trends in Linear Logic and Applications
Authors:
Thomas Ehrhard,
Maribel Fernández,
Valeria de Paiva,
Lorenzo Tortora de Falco
Abstract:
This volume contains a selection of papers presented at Linearity/TLLA 2018: Joint Linearity and TLLA workshops (part of FLOC 2018) held on July 7-8, 2018 in Oxford. Linearity has been a key feature in several lines of research in both theoretical and practical approaches to computer science. On the theoretical side there is much work stemming from linear logic dealing with proof technology, compl…
▽ More
This volume contains a selection of papers presented at Linearity/TLLA 2018: Joint Linearity and TLLA workshops (part of FLOC 2018) held on July 7-8, 2018 in Oxford. Linearity has been a key feature in several lines of research in both theoretical and practical approaches to computer science. On the theoretical side there is much work stemming from linear logic dealing with proof technology, complexity classes and more recently quantum computation. On the practical side there is work on program analysis, expressive operational semantics for programming languages, linear programming languages, program transformation, update analysis and efficient implementation techniques. Linear logic is not only a theoretical tool to analyse the use of resources in logic and computation. It is also a corpus of tools, approaches, and methodologies (proof nets, exponential decomposition, geometry of interaction, coherent spaces, relational models, etc.) that were originally developed for the study of linear logic's syntax and semantics and are nowadays applied in several other fields.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Relational type-checking for MELL proof-structures. Part 1: Multiplicatives
Authors:
Giulio Guerrieri,
Luc Pellissier,
Lorenzo Tortora de Falco
Abstract:
Relational semantics for linear logic is a form of non-idempotent intersection type system, from which several informations on the execution of a proof-structure can be recovered. An element of the relational interpretation of a proof-structure R with conclusion $Γ$ acts thus as a type (refining $Γ$) having R as an inhabitant. We are interested in the following type-checking question: given a proo…
▽ More
Relational semantics for linear logic is a form of non-idempotent intersection type system, from which several informations on the execution of a proof-structure can be recovered. An element of the relational interpretation of a proof-structure R with conclusion $Γ$ acts thus as a type (refining $Γ$) having R as an inhabitant. We are interested in the following type-checking question: given a proof-structure R, a list of formulae $Γ$, and a point x in the relational interpretation of $Γ$, is x in the interpretation of R? This question is decidable. We present here an algorithm that decides it in time linear in the size of R, if R is a proof-structure in the multiplicative fragment of linear logic. This algorithm can be extended to larger fragments of multiplicative-exponential linear logic containing $λ$-calculus.
△ Less
Submitted 1 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
A semantic account of strong normalization in Linear Logic
Authors:
Daniel de Carvalho,
Lorenzo Tortora de Falco
Abstract:
We prove that given two cut free nets of linear logic, by means of their relational interpretations one can: 1) first determine whether or not the net obtained by cutting the two nets is strongly normalizable 2) then (in case it is strongly normalizable) compute the maximal length of the reduction sequences starting from that net.
We prove that given two cut free nets of linear logic, by means of their relational interpretations one can: 1) first determine whether or not the net obtained by cutting the two nets is strongly normalizable 2) then (in case it is strongly normalizable) compute the maximal length of the reduction sequences starting from that net.
△ Less
Submitted 26 August, 2014; v1 submitted 24 April, 2013;
originally announced April 2013.
-
An Abstract Approach to Stratification in Linear Logic
Authors:
Pierre Boudes,
Damiano Mazza,
Lorenzo Tortora de Falco
Abstract:
We study the notion of stratification, as used in subsystems of linear logic with low complexity bounds on the cut-elimination procedure (the so-called light logics), from an abstract point of view, introducing a logical system in which stratification is handled by a separate modality. This modality, which is a generalization of the paragraph modality of Girard's light linear logic, arises from a…
▽ More
We study the notion of stratification, as used in subsystems of linear logic with low complexity bounds on the cut-elimination procedure (the so-called light logics), from an abstract point of view, introducing a logical system in which stratification is handled by a separate modality. This modality, which is a generalization of the paragraph modality of Girard's light linear logic, arises from a general categorical construction applicable to all models of linear logic. We thus learn that stratification may be formulated independently of exponential modalities; when it is forced to be connected to exponential modalities, it yields interesting complexity properties. In particular, from our analysis stem three alternative reformulations of Baillot and Mazza's linear logic by levels: one geometric, one interactive, and one semantic.
△ Less
Submitted 14 February, 2013; v1 submitted 27 June, 2012;
originally announced June 2012.
-
The relational model is injective for Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (without weakenings)
Authors:
Daniel de Carvalho,
Lorenzo Tortora de Falco
Abstract:
We show that for Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (without weakenings) the syntactical equivalence relation on proofs induced by cut-elimination coincides with the semantic equivalence relation on proofs induced by the multiset based relational model: one says that the interpretation in the model (or the semantics) is injective. We actually prove a stronger result: two cut-free proofs of th…
▽ More
We show that for Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (without weakenings) the syntactical equivalence relation on proofs induced by cut-elimination coincides with the semantic equivalence relation on proofs induced by the multiset based relational model: one says that the interpretation in the model (or the semantics) is injective. We actually prove a stronger result: two cut-free proofs of the full multiplicative and exponential fragment of linear logic whose interpretations coincide in the multiset based relational model are the same "up to the connections between the doors of exponential boxes".
△ Less
Submitted 7 February, 2011; v1 submitted 16 February, 2010;
originally announced February 2010.
