National Highway Traffic Safety Administration NHTSA’s Post

NHTSA is announcing a new Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard that will make automatic emergency braking, including pedestrian AEB, standard on all passenger cars and light trucks. This is expected to significantly reduce rear-end and pedestrian crashes. https://lnkd.in/gR9qHWJG

  • New Vehicle Safety Standard: By 2029, vehicle manufacturers must make automatic emergency braking standard in cars and light trucks with a photo of the automatic brake engineering and a quote from NHTSA Deputy Administrator Sophie Shulman.
Phil Magney

Applied Research on ADAS & Automated Driving | Functional Component Examinations | Technical Advisors

2mo

FMVSS #127 raises the bar for ADAS as cars will have to stop for pedestrians at speeds up to 45MHP and do so in the dark! This is no small task. Most current AEB systems would not meet this requirement. FMVSS #127 will heighten the performance requirement of standard ADAS offerings. New sensors, faster inferencing, and more diversity in detector training will be needed.

Partha Goswami

Strategist, futurist, consultant - focusing on emerging technology & disruption in the mobility industry.

2mo

FMVSS no. 127 seems like the culmination of a journey that began in 2019 when NHTSA coordinated a voluntary commitment or MoU by 20 automakers to equip new vehicles with AEB & forward collision warning by 2022. It was better than nothing. However, in absence of specific criteria, the AEB performance varied among OEMs. The new mandate closes this hole, establishing specifics, that vehicles by 2029 offer AEB, capable of braking, stopping, and avoiding contact up to 62 mph, and initiating braking up to 90 mph upon detecting an imminent collision. The additional emphasis on pedestrian detection up to 45 mph in both daylight and darkness will be critical in mitigating rising pedestrian fatalities. Good job, NHTSA.

Bob Nelson

Engineering Manager

2mo

Evidently you’ve never been car jacked. You actually might not want the vehicle to “think” for you. Government continuing to ruin vehicles one FFMVSS at a time. It’s crap (govt mandates) like this that keep pushing me towards politics🤨 Let the consumer decide if they want this product on their car. I’ll be curious to see what that actual non fudged numbers will really be for accident reductions. I’m betting not nearly what they are predicting. Why you ask, because (at least in SE Michigan) the main driver is going to be people driving too fast and close for the road conditions. So it doesn’t really matter what driver assisted drivel is added to the cars, the laws of physics take over and if you need 100 feet to stop safely and you only have 80 feet it doesn’t matter if the driver is mashing the brake pedal to the floor or if it’s ADAS, you’re still short 20 feet.

Like
Reply
Werner Streich

Senior Business Advisor @ PEM Motion | AWS Accredited, Automotive Engineer

2mo

It's long time coming.... US Federal research on this function is dated back all the way to the late 90's. The Federal Automotive Collision Avoidance System s (ACAS) Program did not mention AEB specifically. No mention of Automatic, but I find it remarkable how well the general technical system objectives and technical requirements, specifically for sensors for such a function have been described at the time. DOT HS# 809080 https://ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/dashboard/searchResults/titleDetail/PB2000107393.xhtml

Like
Reply

Thanks for the commitment to safety!

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics