Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul 19;316(3):300-12.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.9389.

Ovarian Stimulation for In Vitro Fertilization and Long-term Risk of Breast Cancer

Affiliations

Ovarian Stimulation for In Vitro Fertilization and Long-term Risk of Breast Cancer

Alexandra W van den Belt-Dusebout et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Previous studies of breast cancer risk after in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment were inconclusive due to limited follow-up.

Objective: To assess long-term risk of breast cancer after ovarian stimulation for IVF.

Design, setting, and participants: Historical cohort (OMEGA study) with complete follow-up through December 2013 for 96% of the cohort. The cohort included 19,158 women who started IVF treatment between 1983 and 1995 (IVF group) and 5950 women starting other fertility treatments between 1980 and 1995 (non-IVF group) from all 12 IVF clinics in the Netherlands. The median age at end of follow-up was 53.8 years for the IVF group and 55.3 years for the non-IVF group.

Exposures: Information on ovarian stimulation for IVF, other fertility treatments, and potential confounders was collected from medical records and through mailed questionnaires.

Main outcomes and measures: Incidence of invasive and in situ breast cancers in women who underwent fertility treatments was obtained through linkage with the Netherlands Cancer Registry (1989-2013). Breast cancer risk in the IVF group was compared with risks in the general population (standardized incidence ratios [SIRs]) and the non-IVF group (hazard ratios [HRs]).

Results: Among 25,108 women (mean age at baseline, 32.8 years; mean number of IVF cycles, 3.6), 839 cases of invasive breast cancer and 109 cases of in situ breast cancer occurred after a median follow-up of 21.1 years. Breast cancer risk in IVF-treated women was not significantly different from that in the general population (SIR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.93-1.09]) and from the risk in the non-IVF group (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.86-1.19]). The cumulative incidences of breast cancer at age 55 were 3.0% for the IVF group and 2.9% for the non-IVF group (P = .85). The SIR did not increase with longer time since treatment (≥20 years) in the IVF group (0.92 [95% CI, 0.73-1.15]) or in the non-IVF group (1.03 [95% CI, 0.82-1.29]). Risk was significantly lower for those who underwent 7 or more IVF cycles (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.39-0.77]) vs 1 to 2 IVF cycles and after poor response to the first IVF cycle (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.61-0.96] for <4 vs ≥4 collected oocytes).

Conclusions and relevance: Among women undergoing fertility treatment in the Netherlands between 1980 and 1995, IVF treatment compared with non-IVF treatment was not associated with increased risk of breast cancer after a median follow-up of 21 years. Breast cancer risk among IVF-treated women was also not significantly different from that in the general population. These findings are consistent with absence of a significant increase in long-term risk of breast cancer among IVF-treated women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

  • History of infertility and risk of breast cancer: a prospective cohort study.
    Farland LV, Wang S, Rich-Edwards JW, Gaskins AJ, Chavarro JE, Wang YX, Tamimi RM, Missmer SA. Farland LV, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 May;199(1):185-193. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06907-1. Epub 2023 Mar 16. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023. PMID: 36928623 Free PMC article.
  • Current Considerations in Surgical Treatment for Adolescents and Young Women with Breast Cancer.
    Murphy BL, Pereslucha A, Boughey JC. Murphy BL, et al. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 15;10(12):2542. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122542. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36554065 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Fertility Counseling in BRCA1/2-Mutated Women with Breast Cancer and Healthy Individuals.
    Kufel-Grabowska J, Podolak A, Maliszewski D, Bartoszkiewicz M, Ramlau R, Lukaszuk K. Kufel-Grabowska J, et al. J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 10;11(14):3996. doi: 10.3390/jcm11143996. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35887761 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Psychosocial factors and cancer incidence (PSY-CA): Protocol for individual participant data meta-analyses.
    van Tuijl LA, Voogd AC, de Graeff A, Hoogendoorn AW, Ranchor AV, Pan KY, Basten M, Lamers F, Geerlings MI, Abell JG, Awadalla P, Bakker MF, Beekman ATF, Bjerkeset O, Boyd A, Cui Y, Galenkamp H, Garssen B, Hellingman S, Huisman M, Huss A, Keats MR, Kok AAL, Luik AI, Noisel N, Onland-Moret NC, Payette Y, Penninx BWJH, Portengen L, Rissanen I, Roest AM, Rosmalen JGM, Ruiter R, Schoevers RA, Soave DM, Spaan M, Steptoe A, Stronks K, Sund ER, Sweeney E, Teyhan A, Vaartjes I, van der Willik KD, van Leeuwen FE, van Petersen R, Verschuren WMM, Visseren F, Vermeulen R, Dekker J. van Tuijl LA, et al. Brain Behav. 2021 Oct;11(10):e2340. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2340. Epub 2021 Sep 2. Brain Behav. 2021. PMID: 34473425 Free PMC article.
  • Long-Term Risk of Ovarian Cancer and Borderline Tumors After Assisted Reproductive Technology.
    Spaan M, van den Belt-Dusebout AW, Lambalk CB, van Boven HH, Schats R, Kortman M, Broekmans FJM, Laven JSE, van Santbrink EJP, Braat DDM, van der Westerlaken LAJ, Cohlen BJ, Cantineau AEP, Smeenk JMJ, van Rumste MM, Goddijn M, van Golde RJT, Meeuwissen PAM, Hamilton CJCM, Ouwens GM, Gerritsma MA, Schaapveld M, Burger CW, van Leeuwen FE. Spaan M, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Jun 1;113(6):699-709. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa163. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021. PMID: 33769500 Free PMC article.

Publication types