An Empathy-Based Sandbox Approach to Bridge the Privacy Gap among Attitudes, Goals, Knowledge, and Behaviors
Authors: 
Chaoran Chen, Weijun Li, Wenxin Song, Yanfang Ye, Yaxing Yao, and Toby Jia-Jun LiAuthors Info & Claims
Chaoran Chen, Weijun Li, Wenxin Song, Yanfang Ye, Yaxing Yao, and Toby Jia-Jun LiAuthors Info & ClaimsMay 2024
Article No.: 234, Pages 1 - 28
Abstract
Managing privacy to reach privacy goals is challenging, as evidenced by the privacy attitude-behavior gap. Mitigating this discrepancy requires solutions that account for both system opaqueness and users’ hesitations in testing different privacy settings due to fears of unintended data exposure. We introduce an empathy-based approach that allows users to experience how privacy attributes may alter system outcomes in a risk-free sandbox environment from the perspective of artificially generated personas. To generate realistic personas, we introduce a novel pipeline that augments the outputs of large language models (e.g., GPT-4) using few-shot learning, contextualization, and chain of thoughts. Our empirical studies demonstrated the adequate quality of generated personas and highlighted the changes in privacy-related applications (e.g., online advertising) caused by different personas. Furthermore, users demonstrated cognitive and emotional empathy towards the personas when interacting with our sandbox. We offered design implications for downstream applications in improving user privacy literacy.
Supplemental Material
MP4 File - Video Presentation
Video Presentation
- Download
- 86.21 MB
- Transcript
References
[1]
Alessandro Acquisti. 2009. Nudging privacy: The behavioral economics of personal information. IEEE security & privacy 7, 6 (2009), 82–85.
[2]
Alessandro Acquisti, Laura Brandimarte, and George Loewenstein. 2015. Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science 347, 6221 (2015), 509–514.
[3]
Alessandro Acquisti, Laura Brandimarte, and George Loewenstein. 2020. Secrets and likes: The drive for privacy and the difficulty of achieving it in the digital age. Journal of Consumer Psychology 30, 4 (2020), 736–758.
[4]
Alessandro Acquisti and Ralph Gross. 2006. Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In Privacy Enhancing Technologies: 6th International Workshop, PET 2006, Cambridge, UK, June 28-30, 2006, Revised Selected Papers 6. Springer, 36–58.
[5]
Idris Adjerid, Eyal Peer, and Alessandro Acquisti. 2018. Beyond the privacy paradox: Objective versus relative risk in privacy decision making. MIS quarterly 42, 2 (2018), 465–488.
[6]
Icek Ajzen. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 50, 2 (1991), 179–211.
[7]
BAYAN AL MUHANDER, JASON WIESE, OMER RANA, and CHARITH PERERA. 2023. Interactive Privacy Management: Towards Enhancing Privacy Awareness and Control in Internet of Things. ACM Trans. Internet Things (jun 2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3600096 Just Accepted.
[8]
Hilal AlAbdali, Mohammed AlBadawi, Mohamed Sarrab, and Abdullah AlHamadani. 2021. Privacy preservation instruments influencing the trustworthiness of e-government services. Computers 10, 9 (2021), 114.
[9]
Yu AN, Yiwen CHEN, and Shang LI. 2021. Intention to Redeem M-Coupons and Intention to Disclose Personal Information: based on Internet using motivation and m-coupons delivery approach. In 2021 5th International Conference on Software and e-Business (ICSEB). 39–44.
[10]
Ivan-Damir Anic, Vatroslav Škare, and Ivana Kursan Milaković. 2019. The determinants and effects of online privacy concerns in the context of e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 36 (2019), 100868.
[11]
Young Min Baek, Young Bae, Irkwon Jeong, Eunmee Kim, and June Woong Rhee. 2014. Changing the default setting for information privacy protection: What and whose personal information can be better protected?The Social Science Journal 51, 4 (2014), 523–533.
[12]
Ruwan Bandara, Mario Fernando, and Shahriar Akter. 2020. Explicating the privacy paradox: A qualitative inquiry of online shopping consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 52 (2020), 101947.
[13]
Albert Bandura and Richard H Walters. 1977. Social learning theory. Vol. 1. Englewood cliffs Prentice Hall.
[14]
Natã Miccael Barbosa, Joon S Park, Yaxing Yao, and Yang Wang. 2019. " What if?" Predicting Individual Users’ Smart Home Privacy Preferences and Their Changes.Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. 2019, 4 (2019), 211–231.
[15]
Simon Baron-Cohen. 2009. The essential difference: Male and female brains and the truth about autism. Basic Books.
[16]
Susanne Barth, Menno DT de Jong, Marianne Junger, Pieter H Hartel, and Janina C Roppelt. 2019. Putting the privacy paradox to the test: Online privacy and security behaviors among users with technical knowledge, privacy awareness, and financial resources. Telematics and informatics 41 (2019), 55–69.
[17]
C Daniel Batson. 1987. Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 20. Elsevier, 65–122.
[18]
Ghazaleh Beigi, Ruocheng Guo, Alexander Nou, Yanchao Zhang, and Huan Liu. 2019. Protecting user privacy: An approach for untraceable web browsing history and unambiguous user profiles. In Proceedings of the twelfth ACM international conference on web search and data mining. 213–221.
[19]
Jonathan Belman and Mary Flanagan. 2010. Designing games to foster empathy. International Journal of Cognitive Technology 15, 1 (2010), 11.
[20]
Alastair R Beresford, Dorothea Kübler, and Sören Preibusch. 2012. Unwillingness to pay for privacy: A field experiment. Economics letters 117, 1 (2012), 25–27.
[21]
Su Lin Blodgett, Solon Barocas, Hal Daumé III, and Hanna Wallach. 2020. Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of" bias" in nlp. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14050 (2020).
[22]
Stefan Blomkvist. 2002. Persona–an overview. Retrieved November 22 (2002), 2004.
[23]
Meryl Brod, Laura E Tesler, and Torsten L Christensen. 2009. Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of life research 18 (2009), 1263–1278.
[24]
Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020), 1877–1901.
[25]
Marion Buchenau and Jane Fulton Suri. 2000. Experience prototyping. In Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. 424–433.
[26]
Lesly Alejandra Gonzalez Camacho and Solange Nice Alves-Souza. 2018. Social network data to alleviate cold-start in recommender system: A systematic review. Information Processing & Management 54, 4 (2018), 529–544.
[27]
Ana Caraban, Evangelos Karapanos, Daniel Gonçalves, and Pedro Campos. 2019. 23 ways to nudge: A review of technology-mediated nudging in human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–15.
[28]
Sandra Carpenter, Michael Shreeves, Payton Brown, Feng Zhu, and Mini Zeng. 2018. Designing warnings to reduce identity disclosure. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 34, 11 (2018), 1077–1084.
[29]
John M Carroll. 1997. Scenario-based design. In Handbook of human-computer interaction. Elsevier, 383–406.
[30]
Jessica Colnago, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Alessandro Acquisti. 2023. Is There a Reverse Privacy Paradox? An Exploratory Analysis of Gaps Between Privacy Perspectives and Privacy-Seeking Behaviors. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 1 (2023), 455–476.
[31]
Matthew Crowley, Aurélia Heitz, Annika Matta, Kevin Mori, and Banny Banerjee. 2011. Behavioral science-informed technology interventions for change in residential energy consumption. CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2011), 2209–2214.
[32]
Benjamin MP Cuff, Sarah J Brown, Laura Taylor, and Douglas J Howat. 2016. Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion review 8, 2 (2016), 144–153.
[33]
Sauvik Das, Laura Dabbish, and Jason Hong. 2019. A typology of perceived triggers for end-user security and privacy behaviors. In Fifteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security ({ SOUPS} 2019).
[34]
Mark H Davis 1980. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. (1980).
[35]
Laurien Desimpelaere, Liselot Hudders, and Dieneke Van de Sompel. 2020. Knowledge as a strategy for privacy protection: How a privacy literacy training affects children’s online disclosure behavior. Computers in human behavior 110 (2020), 106382.
[36]
Tobias Dienlin and Sabine Trepte. 2015. Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in-depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors. European journal of social psychology 45, 3 (2015), 285–297.
[37]
Luce Drouet, Kerstin Bongard-Blanchy, Vincent Koenig, and Carine Lallemand. 2022. Empathy in design scale: development and initial insights. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. 1–7.
[38]
Isabel Dziobek, Kimberley Rogers, Stefan Fleck, Markus Bahnemann, Hauke R Heekeren, Oliver T Wolf, and Antonio Convit. 2008. Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger syndrome using the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET). Journal of autism and developmental disorders 38 (2008), 464–473.
[39]
Nico Ebert, Kurt Alexander Ackermann, and Björn Scheppler. 2021. Bolder is Better: Raising User Awareness through Salient and Concise Privacy Notices. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 67, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445516
[40]
Nicole Eling, Siegfried Rasthofer, Max Kolhagen, Eric Bodden, and Peter Buxmann. 2016. Investigating users’ reaction to fine-grained data requests: A market experiment. In 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE, 3666–3675.
[41]
Jennifer Edson Escalas and Barbara B Stern. 2003. Sympathy and empathy: Emotional responses to advertising dramas. Journal of Consumer Research 29, 4 (2003), 566–578.
[42]
Norma Deitch Feshbach. 1975. Empathy in children: Some theoretical and empirical considerations. The counseling psychologist 5, 2 (1975), 25–30.
[43]
Andrea Franco and Adrian Holzer. 2023. Fostering Privacy Literacy among High School Students by Leveraging Social Media Interaction and Learning Traces in the Classroom. In LAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (Arlington, TX, USA) (LAK2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 538–544. https://doi.org/10.1145/3576050.3576153
[44]
Andrea Franco and Adrian Holzer. 2023. Fostering Privacy Literacy among High School Students by Leveraging Social Media Interaction and Learning Traces in the Classroom. In LAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. 538–544.
[45]
James W Gentry. 1990. What is experiential learning. Guide to business gaming and experiential learning 9 (1990), 20.
[46]
Talip Gonulal and Shawn Loewen. 2018. Scaffolding technique. The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (2018), 1–5.
[47]
Jonathan Grudin and John Pruitt. 2002. Personas, participatory design and product development: An infrastructure for engagement. In Proc. PDC, Vol. 2. 144–152.
[48]
Cory Hallam and Gianluca Zanella. 2017. Online self-disclosure: The privacy paradox explained as a temporally discounted balance between concerns and rewards. Computers in Human Behavior 68 (2017), 217–227.
[49]
Perttu Hämäläinen, Mikke Tavast, and Anton Kunnari. 2023. Evaluating large language models in generating synthetic hci research data: a case study. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–19.
[50]
Aniko Hannak, Gary Soeller, David Lazer, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. 2014. Measuring price discrimination and steering on e-commerce web sites. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on internet measurement conference. 305–318.
[51]
Pelle Guldborg Hansen and Andreas Maaløe Jespersen. 2013. Nudge and the manipulation of choice: A framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy. European Journal of Risk Regulation 4, 1 (2013), 3–28.
[52]
Benjamin Heinzerling and Kentaro Inui. 2020. Language models as knowledge bases: On entity representations, storage capacity, and paraphrased queries. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.09036 (2020).
[53]
Justin L Hess and Nicholas D Fila. 2016. The manifestation of empathy within design: findings from a service-learning course. CoDesign 12, 1-2 (2016), 93–111.
[54]
Robert Hogan. 1969. Development of an empathy scale.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 33, 3 (1969), 307.
[55]
Athina Ioannou, Iis Tussyadiah, Graham Miller, Shujun Li, and Mario Weick. 2021. Privacy nudges for disclosure of personal information: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. PloS one 16, 8 (2021), e0256822.
[56]
Riitta Jääskeläinen. 2010. Think-aloud protocol. Handbook of translation studies 1 (2010), 371–374.
[57]
Ruogu Kang, Laura Dabbish, Nathaniel Fruchter, and Sara Kiesler. 2015. my data just goes everywhere:” user mental models of the internet and implications for privacy and security. In Eleventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2015). Ottawa, 39–52.
[58]
Spyros Kokolakis. 2017. Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & security 64 (2017), 122–134.
[59]
Merlijn Kouprie and Froukje Sleeswijk Visser. 2009. A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user’s life. Journal of Engineering Design 20, 5 (2009), 437–448.
[60]
Brenden M Lake, Tal Linzen, and Marco Baroni. 2019. Human few-shot learning of compositional instructions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.04587 (2019).
[61]
Robert LaRose and Nora J Rifon. 2007. Promoting i-safety: effects of privacy warnings and privacy seals on risk assessment and online privacy behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs 41, 1 (2007), 127–149.
[62]
Toby Jia-Jun Li, Jingya Chen, Brandon Canfield, and Brad A. Myers. 2020. Privacy-Preserving Script Sharing in GUI-Based Programming-by-Demonstration Systems. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW1, Article 60 (may 2020), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392869
[63]
Yuanchun Li, Fanglin Chen, Toby Jia-Jun Li, Yao Guo, Gang Huang, Matthew Fredrikson, Yuvraj Agarwal, and Jason I. Hong. 2017. PrivacyStreams: Enabling Transparency in Personal Data Processing for Mobile Apps. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 3, Article 76 (sep 2017), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130941
[64]
Christoph Lutz and Pepe Strathoff. 2014. Privacy concerns and online behavior–Not so paradoxical after all? Viewing the privacy paradox through different theoretical lenses. SSRN Electronic Journal (2014).
[65]
Michelle Madejski, Maritza Johnson, and Steven M Bellovin. 2012. A study of privacy settings errors in an online social network. In 2012 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops. IEEE, 340–345.
[66]
Kirsten Martin. 2020. Breaking the privacy paradox: the value of privacy and associated duty of firms. Business Ethics Quarterly 30, 1 (2020), 65–96.
[67]
Tom Mattson, Sal Aurigemma, and Jie Ren. 2023. Close the Intention-Behavior Gap via Attitudes: Case Study of the Volitional Adoption of a Two-Factor Authentication Service. (2023).
[68]
Alessandra Mazzia, Kristen LeFevre, and Eytan Adar. 2012. The pviz comprehension tool for social network privacy settings. In Proceedings of the eighth symposium on usable privacy and security. 1–12.
[69]
Tomasz Miaskiewicz and Kenneth A Kozar. 2011. Personas and user-centered design: How can personas benefit product design processes?Design studies 32, 5 (2011), 417–430.
[70]
Patricia H Miller. 2002. Theories of developmental psychology. Macmillan.
[71]
Marwa Hussien Mohamed, Mohamed Helmy Khafagy, and Mohamed Hasan Ibrahim. 2019. Recommender systems challenges and solutions survey. In 2019 international conference on innovative trends in computer engineering (ITCE). IEEE, 149–155.
[72]
Fedor Moiseev, Zhe Dong, Enrique Alfonseca, and Martin Jaggi. 2022. SKILL: structured knowledge infusion for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.08184 (2022).
[73]
Yuki Motomura, Akira Takeshita, Yuka Egashira, Takayuki Nishimura, Yeon-kyu Kim, and Shigeki Watanuki. 2015. Interaction between valence of empathy and familiarity: is it difficult to empathize with the positive events of a stranger?Journal of physiological anthropology 34 (2015), 1–9.
[74]
Moin Nadeem, Anna Bethke, and Siva Reddy. 2020. StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.09456 (2020).
[75]
Nick Nikiforakis, Alexandros Kapravelos, Wouter Joosen, Christopher Kruegel, Frank Piessens, and Giovanni Vigna. 2013. Cookieless monster: Exploring the ecosystem of web-based device fingerprinting. In 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. IEEE, 541–555.
[76]
Patricia A Norberg, Daniel R Horne, and David A Horne. 2007. The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. Journal of consumer affairs 41, 1 (2007), 100–126.
[77]
Jonathan A Obar and Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch. 2020. The biggest lie on the internet: Ignoring the privacy policies and terms of service policies of social networking services. Information, Communication & Society 23, 1 (2020), 128–147.
[78]
Yong Jin Park. 2013. Digital literacy and privacy behavior online. Communication research 40, 2 (2013), 215–236.
[79]
Frank Pasquale. 2015. The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
[80]
Iryna Pentina, Lixuan Zhang, Hatem Bata, and Ying Chen. 2016. Exploring privacy paradox in information-sensitive mobile app adoption: A cross-cultural comparison. Computers in Human Behavior 65 (2016), 409–419.
[81]
Jenny Preece. 1999. Empathic communities: Balancing emotional and factual communication. Interacting with computers 12, 1 (1999), 63–77.
[82]
Stephanie D Preston and Frans BM De Waal. 2002. Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and brain sciences 25, 1 (2002), 1–20.
[83]
Dixon Prem Daniel Rajendran and Rangaraja P Sundarraj. 2021. Using topic models with browsing history in hybrid collaborative filtering recommender system: Experiments with user ratings. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights 1, 2 (2021), 100027.
[84]
Robert W Reeder, Iulia Ion, and Sunny Consolvo. 2017. 152 simple steps to stay safe online: Security advice for non-tech-savvy users. IEEE Security & Privacy 15, 5 (2017), 55–64.
[85]
Paul Resnick and Hal R Varian. 1997. Recommender systems. Commun. ACM 40, 3 (1997), 56–58.
[86]
Frantz Rowe. 2020. Contact tracing apps and values dilemmas: A privacy paradox in a neo-liberal world. International Journal of Information Management 55 (2020), 102178.
[87]
Juni Nurma Sari, Lukito Edi Nugroho, Ridi Ferdiana, and P Insap Santosa. 2016. Review on customer segmentation technique on ecommerce. Advanced Science Letters 22, 10 (2016), 3018–3022.
[88]
Christoph Schneider, Markus Weinmann, and Jan vom Brocke. 2018. Digital Nudging: Guiding Online User Choices through Interface Design. Commun. ACM 61, 7 (jun 2018), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/3213765
[89]
Hong Shen, Tianshi Li, Toby Jia-Jun Li, Joon Sung Park, and Diyi Yang. 2023. Shaping the Emerging Norms of Using Large Language Models in Social Computing Research. In Companion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Minneapolis, MN, USA) (CSCW ’23 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 569–571. https://doi.org/10.1145/3584931.3606955
[90]
Donghee Shin. 2018. Empathy and embodied experience in virtual environment: To what extent can virtual reality stimulate empathy and embodied experience?Computers in human behavior 78 (2018), 64–73.
[91]
Maria Sideri, Angeliki Kitsiou, Eleni Tzortzaki, Christos Kalloniatis, and Stefanos Gritzalis. 2019. Enhancing university students’ privacy literacy through an educational intervention: a Greek case-study. International Journal of Electronic Governance 11, 3-4 (2019), 333–360.
[92]
Jellie Sierksma, Jochem Thijs, and Maykel Verkuyten. 2015. In-group bias in children’s intention to help can be overpowered by inducing empathy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 33, 1 (2015), 45–56.
[93]
Deborah A Small and George Loewenstein. 2003. Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability. Journal of Risk and uncertainty 26 (2003), 5–16.
[94]
Eric Michael Smith, Melissa Hall, Melanie Kambadur, Eleonora Presani, and Adina Williams. 2022. “I’m sorry to hear that”: Finding New Biases in Language Models with a Holistic Descriptor Dataset. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 9180–9211.
[95]
Daniel J Solove. 2021. The myth of the privacy paradox. Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 89 (2021), 1.
[96]
Markus Spiekermann. 2019. Data marketplaces: Trends and monetisation of data goods. Intereconomics 54, 4 (2019), 208–216.
[97]
Jessica Staddon, Alessandro Acquisti, and Kristen LeFevre. 2013. Self-reported social network behavior: Accuracy predictors and implications for the privacy paradox. In 2013 International Conference on Social Computing. IEEE, 295–302.
[98]
Peter Story, Daniel Smullen, Rex Chen, Alessandro Acquisti, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Norman Sadeh, Florian Schaub, 2022. Increasing adoption of tor browser using informational and planning nudges. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2 (2022), 152–183.
[99]
Antti Surma-Aho and Katja Hölttä-Otto. 2022. Conceptualization and operationalization of empathy in design research. Design Studies 78 (2022), 101075.
[100]
Juliana Sutanto, Elia Palme, Chuan-Hoo Tan, and Chee Wei Phang. 2013. Addressing the personalization-privacy paradox: An empirical assessment from a field experiment on smartphone users. MIS quarterly (2013), 1141–1164.
[101]
John K Tarus, Zhendong Niu, and Abdallah Yousif. 2017. A hybrid knowledge-based recommender system for e-learning based on ontology and sequential pattern mining. Future Generation Computer Systems 72 (2017), 37–48.
[102]
Samuel Hardman Taylor, Dominic DiFranzo, Yoon Hyung Choi, Shruti Sannon, and Natalya N Bazarova. 2019. Accountability and empathy by design: Encouraging bystander intervention to cyberbullying on social media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1–26.
[103]
Blase Ur, Pedro Giovanni Leon, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Richard Shay, and Yang Wang. 2012. Smart, useful, scary, creepy: perceptions of online behavioral advertising. In proceedings of the eighth symposium on usable privacy and security. 1–15.
[104]
Helma Van Rijn, Froukje Sleeswijk Visser, Pieter Jan Stappers, and Aslı Deniz Özakar. 2011. Achieving empathy with users: the effects of different sources of information. CoDesign 7, 2 (2011), 65–77.
[105]
Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, 2022. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (2022), 24824–24837.
[106]
Meredydd Williams, Jason RC Nurse, and Sadie Creese. 2016. The perfect storm: The privacy paradox and the Internet-of-Things. In 2016 11th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES). IEEE, 644–652.
[107]
Pamela J Wisniewski, Bart P Knijnenburg, and Heather Richter Lipford. 2017. Making privacy personal: Profiling social network users to inform privacy education and nudging. International Journal of human-computer studies 98 (2017), 95–108.
[108]
Peter Wright and John McCarthy. 2008. Empathy and experience in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 637–646.
[109]
Philip Fei Wu. 2019. The privacy paradox in the context of online social networking: A self-identity perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 70, 3 (2019), 207–217.
[110]
Yaxing Yao, Davide Lo Re, and Yang Wang. 2017. Folk models of online behavioral advertising. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 1957–1969.
[111]
Eric Zeng, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Franziska Roesner. 2021. What makes a “bad” ad? user perceptions of problematic online advertising. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–24.
[112]
Eric Zeng, Rachel McAmis, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Franziska Roesner. 2022. What factors affect targeting and bids in online advertising? a field measurement study. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Internet Measurement Conference. 210–229.
[113]
Yixin Zou, Kevin Roundy, Acar Tamersoy, Saurabh Shintre, Johann Roturier, and Florian Schaub. 2020. Examining the adoption and abandonment of security, privacy, and identity theft protection practices. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.
[114]
Johannes Zrenner, Frederik Oliver Möller, Christian Jung, Andreas Eitel, and Boris Otto. 2019. Usage control architecture options for data sovereignty in business ecosystems. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 32, 3 (2019), 477–495.
Index Terms
- An Empathy-Based Sandbox Approach to Bridge the Privacy Gap among Attitudes, Goals, Knowledge, and Behaviors
Recommendations
How Privacy Concerns, Trust and Risk Beliefs, and Privacy Literacy Influence Users' Intentions to Use Privacy-Enhancing Technologies: The Case of Tor
Due to an increasing collection of personal data by internet companies and several data breaches, research related to privacy gained importance in the last years in the information systems domain. Privacy concerns can strongly influence users' decision ...
A Privacy Risk Assessment Model Based on TAPE Framework
CSAE '18: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Application EngineeringWith1 the development of online social media platform, people are gaining more opportunities to show themselves, meanwhile, more personal information will be exposed to the public. This paper proposes a user's privacy risk assessment model based on the ...
A Case Study of Community Privacy
SOCIALINFORMATICS '12: Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Social InformaticsInformation privacy is desired not only by individuals but also by a community of individuals to safeguard sensitive information for which they are collectively responsible. This paper reports on two aspects of privacy-aware communities that emerged ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
May 2024
18961 pages
ISBN:9798400703300
DOI:10.1145/3613904
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 11 May 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Data Availability
Video Presentation: Video Presentation https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642363#3613904.3642363-talk-video.mp4
Conference
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%
Upcoming Conference
CHI PLAY '24
- Sponsor:
- sigchi
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 703Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)703
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)362
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderFull Text
View this article in Full Text.
Full TextHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format